Without a doubt. Though the boundary between "negative" and "too negative" is a subjective thing.
I just shared this to illustrate raghu's point: in general, people who work on issue X are jazzed when Sanders talks about issue X on national TV. Robert Naiman Policy Director Just Foreign Policy www.justforeignpolicy.org [email protected] (202) 448-2898 x1 On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 10:07 AM, Doug Henwood <[email protected]> wrote: > A friend who's working for Sanders tells me they don't want to go too > negative on HRC. > > > > On Feb 12, 2016, at 10:56 AM, Robert Naiman < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > Here's a great example of what raghu is talking about. This note was > posted this morning on a list serve of Honduras solidarity groups: > > > > === > > > > Bernie Sanders mentioned Honduras "and neighboring countries" when > talking about the plight of immigrant children tonight. He mentioned how > these kids are fleeing violence and that their very lives are at stake. He > lost an opportunity to mention that Clinton bears a great deal of > responsibility for supporting a corrupt and violent coup government and its > tragic legacy. Maybe he doesn't know this. Maybe we should make him and > his campaign aware that despite Clinton's professed support of democracy > worldwide, she actively undermined an effort to revert the military coup of > a democratically elected president in Central America. Children migrating > to the US is only one of the consequences of her actions, but one that she > should be held liable for. > > _______________________________________________ > pen-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l >
_______________________________________________ pen-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
