I
don't think this would be right. For example, if there were no concrete
entities, there would still be an abstract entity called "the set of all
concrete entities", and you could make true or false statements about it (like
"it's an empty set"). If you were a Platonist.
dd
-----Original Message-----
From: PEN-L list [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Devine, James
Sent: 14 October 2004 19:21
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Dialectics/Phil of MathJKS writes: >I don't see what is so problematic about the idea of abstract entities.<I would guess that abstract "entities" don't exist separate from concrete entities. Rather, they are characteristics of the latter.JD
