Let me take what I wrote a bit farther... >Do not all humans act paraconsistently?
They do. So now what? Is not the reason for creating a term like paraconsistency a reason to, politically, keep those using it away from the electorate? Not guilty by reason of jargon? In terms of human history, it is _all_ paraconsistent. The Council at Nicea in 325 is still to report on Marx and Hegel but waiting for the approval of Gramsci and me. Ken.
