My sense too.

I do not deny the importance of Martin's question

"The issue here is whether Chinese workers are benefiting from this
ongoing
shift to a foreign driven export led growth model."

But in terms of geo-politics this looks like a pivotal moment.

The Chinese have still a unified power system, however you define it
in class terms, and they can coordinate how they deploy the capital at
their disposal on a massive scale.

It is highly debatable, to say the least, that it is even a form of
socialism, but in terms of capital being ultimately a social relation,
this is monopoly finance capital being wielded on a world scale
against the hegemonism of the US, very cunningly. I cannot see how the
US can escape the snare. The Chinese can be quite sophisticated in how
they tweak the noose very occasionally, eg with the sudden absence of
bond buyers in the market, studiously NOT connected with any public
policy comment.

Whether it ultimately provides conditions for a more socialist world
and the overthrow of the power of capital as dead labour, will be
highly contested territory.

Chris Burford
London


----- Original Message ----- From: "Max B. Sawicky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, November 18, 2004 2:06 PM Subject: Re: [PEN-L] in hock to the Chinese


Marty's comments are all well-taken, but I think
he understates a tad the Chinese advantage.

Yes the Chinese need to sell into the U.S., but
in this vein they are riding the wave of free-
trade policy originating in the U.S., plus the
U.S. appetite for imports.  At the
same time they can diddle with their holdings
and purchases of U.S. Gov bonds under no
restrictions.  I would say in this way they
have fingertip control of interest rate
deviations.

They don't have to cause any large change or
suffer from it.  All they have to do is jiggle
the table a bit to neutralize any annoying U.S.
overtures.

Between this and North Korea, it looks like
they have Bush by the short hairs.

mbs


-----Original Message----- From: PEN-L list [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Martin Hart-Landsberg Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2004 6:57 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [PEN-L] in hock to the Chinese



Reply via email to