Challenges Planned to Ohio's Presidential Vote Totals
  The Associated Press

  Monday 06 December 2004

  COLUMBUS, Ohio - When Ohio Secretary of State J. Kenneth Blackwell
certifies the state's final presidential election results, declaring
President Bush the winner by about 119,000 votes, critics say they intend to
present two challenges.

  Lawyers representing voters upset about problems at the polls plan to
contest the results with the Ohio Supreme Court, citing documented cases of
long lines, a shortage of machines and a pattern of problems in
predominantly black neighborhoods.

  In addition, third-party candidates, bolstered by a favorable federal
court ruling, plan to file requests for a recount in each of Ohio's 88
counties. About 400 people rallied at the Ohio Statehouse in Columbus on
Saturday to demand that a recount begin immediately.

  The efforts represent "an incredible long shot," said Steven Huefner, an
Ohio State University law professor. "Courts are just incredibly reluctant
to overturn the results of an election, absent a really strong showing that
something happened that affected the outcome."

  Bush defeated Democrat John F. Kerry in the state by two percentage points
when provisional and absentee ballots were counted. That was much closer
than the totals on election night but not close enough to trigger an
automatic recount.

  Green and Libertarian party candidates have raised the $113,600 required
to pay for a recount. A ruling by U.S. District Judge Edmund A. Sargus Jr.
on Friday, rejecting Delaware County's attempt to stop a recount, paved the
way for it to begin after Ohio's electors meet on Dec. 13.

  Republicans say it will not change the result.

  "There's simply nothing in the election process that could possibly meet
that standard, so the contest will fail like all the other legal
maneuverings that failed," said Mark Weaver, an attorney for the Ohio
Republican Party.

  Cliff Arnebeck, a Columbus lawyer working for the Massachusetts-based
Alliance for Democracy, said overturning the result is not the objective.

  "We should verify the accuracy of the vote and the process by which the
vote was achieved," he said.

  Arnebeck wants Ohio Supreme Court Chief Justice Thomas J. Moyer to review
evidence of election irregularities, an option allowed under state law.

  The last time the law was used statewide was during Paul Pfeifer's 1990
challenge of Lee Fisher's 1,234-vote victory in the attorney general's race.


  Pfeifer, a Republican now on the state Supreme Court, argued that
irregularities such as discrepancies between the number of ballots and the
number of signatures in poll books could have cost him the election. The
court disagreed, and Fisher won.

________________________________

  Go to Original
<http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/chi-0412040222dec04,1,1925530.stor
y?coll=chi-news-hed>

  Dead Voters on Rolls, Other Glitches Found in 6 Key States
  By Geoff Dougherty
  The Chicago Tribune

  Saturday 04 December 2004

  Michel Pillet died in 2002, but his name lives on at the University of New
Mexico. He created the school's graduate architecture program and directed
it for years.

  Pillet's name lives on in another way too. He's still listed as a
registered voter in New Mexico, even though election officials are required
to purge the names of deceased voters.

  A Tribune analysis of voter records suggests that more than 5,000 dead
people remained on the rolls on Election Day in New Mexico. The presidential
election there was decided by 6,000 votes.

  And New Mexico is not alone. The Tribune's review of voter data there and
in five other key states - Florida, Iowa, Ohio, Michigan and Minnesota -
found widespread flaws in the integrity of voter rolls.

  More than 181,000 dead people were listed on the rolls in the six swing
states, despite efforts to clean up the country's voting system after the
2000 election.

  Thousands more voters were registered to vote in two places, which could
have allowed them to cast more than one ballot.

  Further, more than 90,000 voters in Ohio cast ballots without a valid
presidential choice. Either they decided not to choose a candidate, the
machine failed to register their choice, or they mistakenly voted for more
than one candidate.

  And the FBI is investigating allegations that Republicans in Florida
mounted a large-scale campaign to tamper with ballots.

  Those developments come after an election that most observers agree was a
vast improvement over the 2000 vote.

  Data on which voters cast ballots in the November election are not
available in some key states as they await county compilations. So it's
unclear whether any people registered in two places voted more than once.
Likewise, it's impossible to tell whether ballots were cast in the names of
the deceased voters on the rolls.

  But the number of voters who should have been removed from the rolls and
were not is considered cause for concern, especially in states where the
presidential election was decided by just a few thousand votes.

  "The problem of bloated registration rolls is a serious problem," said Dan
Seligson, editor of electionline.org, a voting reform clearinghouse.

  Legislation passed after the 2000 election was designed to fix some of
those problems by requiring states to maintain better registration data. But
those requirements take effect in 2006.

  New Mexico health officials each month supply a list of recently deceased
residents that Secretary of State Rebecca Vigil-Giron uses to scrub the
voter rolls. But Pillet died in France and apparently never received a New
Mexico death certificate, she said.

  'Fell Through the Cracks'

  "He fell through the cracks," said Vigil-Giron.

  Francis Walsh, a former assembly worker at Chicago's American Can Co.,
retired and moved to Iowa. He died there in June 2002, but remains a
registered voter in Des Moines.

  The Tribune's analysis suggests 4,900 other Iowa voters have died but
remain on the rolls.

  Bush won Iowa by 10,000 votes.

  Phyllis Peters, spokeswoman for the Iowa secretary of state's office, said
workers there anticipated that many deceased Iowans would appear on the
rolls.

  Peters said her agency conducts a monthly purge of voters whose death
certificates have been filed with the state vital statistics agency. But of
course some people die elsewhere, complicating the process.

  Data-entry errors can create problems too. On Walsh's voter information,
he is listed as a female. But his death certificate said he was male, so
computers did not remove him from the voter rolls, Peters said.

  Despite the number of questionable registrations and Bush's thin margin of
victory, Peters said she is confident in the election's outcome. That's due
mostly to the 10,000 local election workers looking for suspicious voters,
she said.

  "We really believe there's a lot of integrity at the local precinct
level," she said.

  Among the states, Florida led the way with 64,889 registered voters who
were also listed in a database of Social Security Administration death
claims, the Tribune analysis found.

  Next was Michigan, with 50,051.

  The problem of duplicate voter registrations spurred Glenda Hood,
Florida's secretary of state and top election official, to request help from
the FBI before the election in weeding out double-voters.

  "We believe that immediate and decisive action on the federal level is
necessary to send a strong message that this type of illegal behavior and
manipulation of the electoral franchise will not be tolerated," said Hood's
letter, written Aug. 26.

  William Fisher moved from Florida to Ohio and registered to vote. He was
surprised to learn that he could have cast a second ballot in Florida.

  "I'm retired now, and out of Florida, so I shouldn't be listed as a
Florida voter anymore," he said.

  In Ohio, civil rights leader Jesse Jackson is demanding a review of the
election, saying too many questions have been raised to let Bush's win stand
without further examination.

  "We can live with winning and losing. We cannot live with fraud and
stealing," Jackson said Sunday at Mt. Hermon Baptist Church in Columbus,
Ohio.

  Voting complaints in Ohio have focused on the use of antiquated punch-card
voting machines - the same type of machines that led to thousands of hanging
chads in Florida four years ago.

  Ohio Recount Sought

  Meanwhile, third-party candidates, joined by Sen. John Kerry's campaign
organization, have requested a recount in Ohio, which would begin after the
election results are certified. That must happen by Monday.

  A hearing on the recount request was held in federal court in Columbus on
Friday.

  County-by-county results provided to The Associated Press on Friday
indicated Bush's margin of victory in Ohio will be about 119,000 votes,
smaller than the unofficial margin of 136,000, mainly because of the
addition of provisional ballots.

  Ohio's so-called spoilage rate, ballots cast without a discernable vote
for president, was lower than Florida's in the 2000 election. But the number
of discarded ballots - 92,000 - represents a significant number, given that
Bush's margin of victory was about 119,000 .

  The state Democratic Party is watching the potential recount carefully,
said spokesman Dan Trevas.

  "It could be that we lost it," he said. "But if there's a little more to
it, we've got to check it out. Let's just make sure everything's
aboveboard."

  In Florida, new touch-screen voting machines eliminated overvotes and
chads. But some allege that ATM-like technology has created other problems.

  University of California, Berkeley, professor Michael Hout compared voting
patterns in the Florida counties that used the new machines with those that
relied on ballots similar to the multiple-choice forms on standardized
tests.

  He found differences in those patterns that led him to conclude that
computer problems with the new machines had given an edge to Bush. He
suggested software glitches could have left some Kerry votes uncounted, or
assigned them mistakenly to Bush.

  "Statistically what we have is a smoke alarm that's beeping," said Hout.
"It's up to the local people in Florida to figure out what to do about it."

  Also in Florida, Democratic congressional candidate Jeff Fisher, who was
defeated Nov. 2, said he had seen e-mails outlining a Republican plot to
steal the presidential election. The plot, he said, involved election
workers who created bogus voter registrations. The workers then rigged
computers to show those ghost voters had cast ballots for Bush.

  The FBI confirmed that Fisher had filed a complaint and that agents were
investigating.

  -------

  Chicago Tribune staff reporter Sarah Frank contributed to this report from
Washington.

  -------

Reply via email to