Tax breaks boost deficit
By Leah Samuel
Special to The Michigan Citizen

As Detroiters brace for cuts in city services, and city workers - faced with
layoffs and wage cuts - prepare to pay their city taxes in April, local
companies can look forward to massive tax deductions.

An analysis of City of Detroit data shows that over a five-year period,
beginning in 1994, the Detroit City Council approved over $200 million in
corporate tax breaks.

Now, with millions of dollars in corporate taxes still going uncollected,
the cash-strapped city is eliminating jobs and raising taxes for residents.

"I don't think anybody can afford tax abatements any more," City Council
President Maryann Mahaffey said.

A 2000 report by the City Council's Fiscal Analysis Division lists over 60
abatements granted from 1994 to 1999. Each agreement provided a company 12
years of reduced taxes. The oldest of these agreements will expire in 2006,
while the most recent will continue until 2011.

Corporations get tax abatements by entering into agreements with the city.
The agreements, which the city council approves, allow companies to pay
reduced taxes for a period of time and have become a regular part of doing
business in Detroit.

The Greater Detroit Regional Chamber touts tax abatements as a way to bring
revenue to the city.

"I wouldn't look at it as losing taxes," John Carroll, the Chamber's vice
president of business development, said. "Abated taxes are better than no
taxes. If the city didn't get those businesses in, they wouldn't have gotten
the taxes they got."

But the effect of these deals is that residents' taxes pay for city services
that companies use but do not support with their full share of taxes. These
include services such as police and fire protection, public lighting and
street maintenance.

City officials have defended tax breaks by suggesting that the companies
receiving them would bring jobs to the city. But the jobs often come at a
tremendous cost to the city in uncollected revenue.

In 1996, American Axle and Manufacturing received a tax abatement of about
$33.5 million over 12 years. With the company promising to create 170 new
jobs, the company received a tax break of over $197,000 for each new job.

Corver Engineering got a tax break contract worth up to $1,050,600 in 1999,
promising nine new jobs. That comes to almost $117,000 per new job.

The new jobs were not only expensive, they were also relatively few. In
nearly all cases, companies getting tax breaks promised mainly to hold on to
existing jobs. The total number of jobs each company promised reflected
mostly retained jobs, with a smaller number of newly created jobs.

"The [tax abatement] law is written in such a way that we only need to
consider whether they will retain jobs, not whether they will create new
ones," explained Mahaffey.

In fact, for 26 of the tax break agreements, there were no new jobs promised
at all. DaimlerChrysler is one example. In that five-year period, the city
council granted the automaker five tax abatements, which would save the
company over $119 million in taxes.

For each of its tax break agreements, DaimlerChrysler promised only to
retain current jobs.

And even the job retention did not always happen. As of 1999, 16 companies,
including DaimlerChrysler, lost jobs despite their promises to retain them.

"I think we're in a box," Mahaffey said. "If we don't give [them a tax
break] they go to Tennessee. If we do give it to them, they'll come in,
create no jobs, live out their 12 years and then go to Tennessee."

After giving away over $200 million in tax abatements (and ending up facing
a deficit of over $200 million), city officials are left to decide whether
offering corporate tax breaks is worthwhile.

"I expect that they would still do them," Carroll, the Chamber vice
president, said. "City council needs to look at the real impact of these tax
abatements."

But Mahaffey said that eliminating tax abatements could perhaps become one
of the city's cost-cutting measures.

"I don't know if we can declare a moratorium," she said, "but we can
definitely look into it."

Reply via email to