Yoshie Furuhashi wrote:
Yoshie Furuhashi wrote:
One worry is the question of identity. As has been posted here, some long-time American Indian critics of Churchill have been questioning whether or not Churchill really counts as "American Indian."
Not an intensely compelling question, but Churchill seems to think it's important.
Doug
Who counts as "Indian," "Black," "officially poor," etc. of course matters a great deal in bean-counting. The fewer of them there are, the less money the federal and state governments need to hand out.
So you're saying that obsessing over ethnic definitions is the business of rulers, and not dissidents and revolutionaries?
Doug
