Daniel, I don't recall this at all. Could you fill us in with more
detail on the policy change?

Daniel Davies wrote:

You're not missing anything and you're not the only person who believes it.
This is why the benefits were wage-indexed in the first place; it was done
in the Carter years as a money-saving measure!!!





--

Michael Perelman
Economics Department
California State University
michael at ecst.csuchico.edu
Chico, CA 95929
530-898-5321
fax 530-898-5901

Reply via email to