This action by the right is a dangerous governmental precedent.
This can become an important wedge issue against the Administration and
the religious right on many levels, because the right wing supreme
court didn't take up the call from the right wing congress.

Nonetheless--
Did you also know that Terri's case has also been taken up by the disability
organization, "Not Dead Yet"?   They see her husband's willingness
to kill her as a dangerous precedent for killing disabled people
because someone else thinks someone's quality of life is not "something
I would want to live with."

Do you know that Terri's husband has refused for all these
years to let her have any kind of rehabilitation therapy?

When I hear "persistant vegetative state" as a description of Terri, I picture
someone laying in a bed, no movement, no sign of life other than
breath, heart beat and the occasional muscle twitch.
Yet, last night on my tv news I saw pictures of her looking like
disabled people I know and love.  She was upright, with head
and eyes moving. She is not dying, she has 20-30 years
of life ahead --with decent humane care. She may be severely
brain damaged and maybe her husband can't stand the thought
of that.  But many people who live with brain injuries do not
wish to be killed.  If food and water were medical treatments,
then groceries would be tax-deductible.

I'm not defending Tom DeLay and his cronies.  Obviously, if they
cared about life, they would not have defunded parts of Medicaid
that apply to nursing homes (tsee below for an article about
this by a prominent disability leader).

I'm suggesting that if progressives and liberals would embrace
the disability movement, you would know the questions that
need to be asked and the principals that should apply. "Right
to Life" is a slogan, not a principal.

By the way, don't rush out to fill out medical power of attorney
forms because you "don't want to be like Terri".  Thinking
about it now is a good thing, but  be careful.  Try to put
in safeguards so you won't be killed by some HMO when
your expenses of care are too high.  Many, many of us who came
to disability in mid-life have good fulfilling years.  It's hard to
imagine because of the stigma attached to disability-- but
you really don't know what you would want or feel like until
you wake up and you are living in a body that is significantly
different than the one you are used to.

much love and respect for all your wonderful work,
adriennne

ZNet Commentary
Bush's Smokescreen March 24, 2005
By Marta Russell

Bush and his cohorts rushed to Washington this past week end to conduct
special sessions of Congress so that Bush could sign a bill that would
mandate the Terri Schiavo case be heard in the federal district court.

"It should be our goal as a nation to build a culture of life, where all
Americans are valued, welcomed, and protected - and that culture of life
must extend to individuals with disabilities," Bush's press release said.

Watching this spectacle on TV and knowing what I know, frankly, it was
enough to make one throw up. A memo, which the AP reports was distributed by
Senate leadership to right-wing members, called Schiavo "a great political
issue" and urged senators to talk about her because "the pro-life base will
be excited."

The issue was not only turned into a political football but also a sly
distraction. Here is a man and his political party eviscerating the Social
Contract while they profess to have concern over all disabled peoples lives.

The truth is that over the past months this Bush administration has attacked
nearly every program upon which low-income and middle-class disabled persons
rely to survive - Social Security, Medicaid, Medicare, Section 8 housing,
food stamps, education, and veterans'
medical care. I am sure that I have missed some.

No mind, the point is that the rush to save Terri Schaivo's life stinks of
hypocrisy. While they gather over one disabled woman millions remain at
risk.

While disabled people are wondering how they are going to make it if the
Bush administration succeeds with this unconscionable budget, the
Republicans are preaching from the pulpit of congress about what good people
they are. Oh please! As a disabled woman I am repelled.

Some disabled individuals I know are preparing for the worst, even death at
their own hand. The billions in cuts will cut off their life-saving
prescriptions, limit their access to assistive technology, the ability to
live in the community, wheelchairs, wheelchair repairs, access to an
affordable place to live, food, clothing, and a host of things many
Americans take for granted like those sitting in the Congress.

Then this in the New York Times from ethics meister Tom Delay: "One thing
that God has brought to us is Terri Schiavo, to help elevate the visibility
of what is going on in America," Mr. DeLay told a conference organized by
the Family Research Council, a conservative Christian group.

Mr. DeLay the American people could use more visibility about your highly
suspicious conduct in Texas where you may be indicted on several fronts for
foul (read alleged illegal) play.

In the end the Shiavo bill only applies to her! The thousands languishing in
hospitals and nursing homes across the nation don't count, you see, in the
light of all this holy goodness.

In 1999, Bush the Governor, signed a law that "allows hospitals to
discontinue life-sustaining care, even if patient family members disagree."
Recently, the law permitted Texas Children's Hospital to remove the
breathing tube from a 6-month-old boy named Sun Hudson.

Bush has no qualms about executing "mentally ill" persons on death row or
anyone else. Under Bush's governorship Texas executed - killed -- more than
150 prisoners. Nevermind their guilt or innocence, where is the culture of
life in that?

More hypocrisy. The Republicans have attacked the trial lawyers for bringing
"frivolous" lawsuits against hospitals and doctors - in particular Senator
(Dr.) Bill Frist who is grandstanding on the Shiavo matter - yet a
malpractice award of one million dollars is financing much of Shiavo's care.
If the Congress gets its way people like Shaivo would already be dead.

The smokescreen has been lifted and the creeps are behind the curtains.

If you think all this sucks, congratulations - you still have warm blood
running through your veins.

Marta Russell is the author of Beyond Ramps: Disability at the End of the
Social Contract. She can be reached at [EMAIL PROTECTED]

--
Marta Russell
Los Angeles, CA
http://www.martarussell.com/

Commentaries are a premium sent to Sustainer Donors of Z/ZNet
To learn more folks can consult ZNet at http://www.zmag.org

Reply via email to