This note is probably for David because nothing I say here will be particularly 
new to most
of us.

Part of the problem may be definitional.  We have people in our department 
would fit in the
Democratic leadership Council framework.  They would define themselves as 
liberal, not
conservative.  They're not the majority in our department but far.  But except 
on wedge
issues, they would not differ greatly from a traditional Midwestern Republican.

Also, I think that you might see a difference by cohorts.  I was tired in 1971 
because the
department sensed a growing radicalism and thought that someone like me might 
be able to
attract greater enrollments.  I would not be hired today.  Someone was my 
mindset would not
be hired in virtually any four-year college today unless that person had a 
degree from a
very prestigious university.  Berkeley, my alma mater, would not be sufficient.

Finally, the university is not an egalitarian institution.  Trustees, 
presidents, deans,
and lesser administrators exert considerable power, limiting what a radical 
might say or
do.  I have not heard of many cases of people being disciplined for 
conservative beliefs.




--
Michael Perelman
Economics Department
California State University
Chico, CA 95929

Tel. 530-898-5321
E-Mail michael at ecst.csuchico.edu

Reply via email to