On Apr 10, 2005 12:36 PM, Max B. Sawicky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I would take it a step further. Recently > Robert not-Paul Samuelson had a screed in > the Post lambasting social insurance as > welfare for the profound reason that it > entailed some people paying taxes that > went in payments to others. Besides > motivating social insurance as insurance, > we ought to motivate "welfare" or public > assistance as social insurance too. In its > anti-poverty role, SS in fact is not a whole > lot different from "welfare," but this says > more about welfare than SS. > > mbs ----------------------------------------
Heck, all taxes do that..........
