Yes, Jim D. has pointed out how little "Keynesian" there was in New Deal
policy. I agreed and would point out that the New Deal was really much
closer to an "institutionalist" economic policy (managed marketing
arrangements, regulatory controls particularly for finance, large
infrastructure projects and limited, targeted public works).  Really
resembles more conventional 1950's Development Economics than Keynes.  In
fact I believe Alvin Hansen who "brought Keynes to the US" (at least his
version) was quite an institutionalist before that.

I also pointed (and won't bore pen-l with a rehash) that quite a case has
been built up to show that the Nazis too were largely establishmentarian
(1930's style) in their macro policies until just before the war, despite
massive self-propaganda that they were building a "new society" with
"modern" methods.  People simply didn't go to the archives to dig up the
basic numbers (which the Nazis had never published).

I am always amazed at how little we really know about the big questions in
economics.  And how much depends on crucial and often unexpressed
assumptions that do not get examined.  In this case, a whole school of
thought has risen and (somewhat) fallen with very little actual experience
being examined (some would also say with little actual experience - full
stop...since Keynesianism was almost never tried).

The situation is even worse with Sraffian/Marxian explanations.  Until
recently (Tonak/Shaikh, Dumenil/Levy) we hardly even have had illustrative
numbers to toss around.

Paul

3. As part of his long but useful essay, Ralph writes: >Hence,
material conditions dictated as one of a limited range of feasible
courses militarization and the attempt to capture colonial markets and
resources. With Hjalmar Schacht's guidance the Nazi regime was able to
restore growth and sharply reduce unemployment through a program of
public works and rearmament facilitated by running budget deficits in
defiance of financial orthodoxy - similar to the New Deal of FDR,
which was less far-reaching due to the limits of presidential power
...<

Paul & I discussed this before. I don't think the New Deal was
Keynesian (in the sense of truly pumping up aggregate spending) until
WW II. The Germans were able to break the balance-the-budget orthodoxy
more.

Reply via email to