Benoit Mandelbrot would suggest that the Matthew Effect (in its guise of
undervalued securities getting more and more undervalued) was what did for
Merton fils in the end.

dd

-----Original Message-----
From: PEN-L list [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Michael
Perelman
Sent: 08 May 2005 16:44
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Jesus and the housing bubble


Yes, that is where I first heard it.  His son, of course, tried to help
enfoce it as
on of the principals of Long Term Credit Management.



On Sun, May 08, 2005 at 09:47:41AM -0400, ravi wrote:
> On 07/05/2005 11:00 PM, Michael Perelman wrote:
> > you mean
> >
> > "For to everyone who has will more be given, and he will have
> > abundance but from him who has not even what he has will be taken
> > away" (Matthew 25:29).
> >
>
> what robert merton called  "the matthew effect"...
>
> http://www.physicstoday.org/vol-58/iss-4/p17.html
>
>         --ravi

--
Michael Perelman
Economics Department
California State University
Chico, CA 95929

Tel. 530-898-5321
E-Mail michael at ecst.csuchico.edu

Reply via email to