According to the HubbertPeak.com/gas/ people, the gas situation is not
nearly as plentiful as Gene portrays here.  Here is their estimate from
their website and deals with world supplies, not just NA supplies:

"The two largest resources not yet in production are in the Sahara and
Niger Delta. It can be supposed that gas pipelines will be built soon
from the Middle East to Europe and the Indian subcontinent, so that
production will rise in steps as the linkages are made. If one assumes a
1% increase over the next 5 years followed by a 4% increase thereafter
as oil becomes expensive, the midpoint of depletion (more or less the
gas "Hubbert Peak") would come around 2018 at about 120 Tcf/annum."

Paul Phillips

Eugene Coyle wrote:

The gas situation, to me, is not as clear as Kunstler portrays it.  I
think there was a capital strike by the big oil companies re drilling
for gas in the continental USA.  Most of the on-going drilling is by the
rest of the industry.
   The big oil companies are aware that the world is awash in gas in
places were there is not market for it.  Hence the attractiveness of a
high enough price in the USA to make importing LNG profitable.  We've
been at and above that price for a couple of years.  Proposals for LNG
terminals in North America abound, though as Kunstler says, local
opposition has stopped several already.
   In response, the Bush administration wants to have siting power
reside in Washington, rather than the local or state agencies where the
plants would actually be sited.  At the moment there are major conflicts
in Rhode Island, California, and elsewhere, including Baja California
near San Diego.
   Recently it was reported that a new cartel of gas exporters is under
construction.  These mostly small nations are concerned that the
enthusiasm for LNG plants will result in a few years of too much
capacity, followed by falling prices.

   My guess is that Cheney et al want gas prices high enough here so
that LNG is financially feasible, to create a market for the gas already
discovered abroad by their oil industry friends.  This also fits nicely
with their deep lobbying for new nukes, which seems to have paid off in
converting big enviro groups to switch sides and be open to new
construction (and subsidy) of nukes.

Gene Coyle

paul phillips wrote:

Re gas:  From Kunstler, THE LONG EMERGENCY

"To aggravate matters, American natural-gas production is also
declining, at five percent a year, despite frenetic new drilling, and
with the potential of much steeper declines ahead. Because of the oil
crises of the 1970s, the nuclear-plant disasters at Three Mile Island
and Chernobyl and the acid-rain problem, the U.S. chose to make gas its
first choice for electric-power generation. The result was that just
about every power plant built after 1980 has to run on gas. Half the
homes in America are heated with gas. To further complicate matters, gas
isn't easy to import. Here in North America, it is distributed through a
vast pipeline network. Gas imported from overseas would have to be
compressed at minus-260 degrees Fahrenheit in pressurized tanker ships
and unloaded (re-gasified) at special terminals, of which few exist in
America. Moreover, the first attempts to site new terminals have met
furious opposition because they are such ripe targets for terrorism."

Paul Phillips


Michael Perelman wrote:

Massimo suggests natural gas.  I don't know how nat. gas supplies
will hold up under
a massive conversion to that fuel.  I had not heard until recently
about converting
nat. gas to diesel.  Nat. gas is a valuable feedstock for industrial
use.  I suspect
that it has not been explored for as intensively as oil, so I have no
idea when a
Hubbert's peak would occur.

I am sure we have an expert here.
--
Michael Perelman
Economics Department
California State University
Chico, CA 95929

Tel. 530-898-5321
E-Mail michael at ecst.csuchico.edu






--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.11.12 - Release Date: 5/17/05





--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.11.12 - Release Date: 5/17/05

Reply via email to