A main fallacy in the "anti-conspiracy theory" idea that is all the rave on
the Left these days is that observing that a given major political event is
the result of a plot by agents of the ruling class does not entail a THEORY
that the SYSTEM is a "conspiracy" and not a system.

The fact that there are divisions in the ruling class doesn't mean there are
no plots by agents of the ruling class, that the ruling class is divided
over everything !  In the main , the ruling class is NOT divided, but
united, otherwise, they'd fall. Duh. The main characteristic of the ruling
class is that it is united, not divided,  vis-a-vis the working class.

The historically necessary condition for ruling classes to rule, given that
they  are always elite minorities , is that they be more class conscious and
united than the classes they rule over. "Class conscious" means very much
aware and knowing of what they are doing, including sitting around talking
about and planning how to keep ruling over the working classes through
specific programs, bribes, wars, assassinations, provocations, diversions,
numerous and various crimes , not by accident , but by plan ,purpose and
organization. Don't kid yourself. They have arguments and disagreements, but
in the main relative to the working class they are unified and CONSCIOUS.


Jumping up and squawking "conspiracy theory ! conspiracy theory !" everytime
somebody speculates about plots by ruling class agents tends to make the
squawker sound naïve and ivory towerish, like they have their head in the
clouds,and thereby less credible on other issues.

We are in a class war. Know thy class enemy.

Charles


*       Subject: Re: quotation du jour 
*       From: Dan Scanlan  

________________________________

Calling an observation a conspiracy theory is, I think, a glandular
reaction and not an adequate argument.
The world bustles with conspiracies from parents hiding Christmas
presents from their kids to Bush Sr. and Gov. Clinton trading arms
for drugs. Calling either act a conspiracy theory doesn't not address
the validity of the facts.

-clip-

Reply via email to