Greetings Economists,

On Feb 10, 2006, at 2:07 PM, Charles Brown wrote:
Metaphor is sort of algebra...so.


Doyle,
Hey CB that reminds me of an area I'm researching now.  Ethnographic
studies gives us some insights about how humans take their cultural
tools and use them to shape their ways of understanding.  So one area
that awhile back gave me a lot of interesting things to think about is
the NA people is western China who have a matrilineal society.  This is
pretty complicated in how when husbands and fathers are not part of a
family that moms are the center of the household, and the shifts that
encompasses in female social roles.  The NA are a linguistic minority
and like a lot of small language groups can continue their cultural
heritage because of language barriers that protect their often tiny
culture from the impact of a much larger culture, in this case the
mammoth Han culture of China.

But what I am about to study is a small culture in Ghana, that does not
accept the rationalist point of view we are familiar with in the West.
They see themselves directly connected to the world.  The book is from
UC press, called "Culture & the Sense Bodily Ways of Knowing in an
African Community".  Let's take your remark above, when a culture, a
small culture has been isolated they can't have or don't have the
resources we have.  In the global culture all kinds of tools, like
literacy give us a sense that 'knowing' is not so direct.  But for this
small culture they still retain what I think Marx was referring to
about alienation, a sense of the directness of 'knowing'.

CB writes,
(cuneiform wedges used in trade/taxing in Mesopotamia)is pertinent
here. Counting or arithmetic too; counting might be the first writing if
writing starts in commodity exchange

Doyle,
You know what frustrates me?  In the U.S. certain cultural technologies
that bug Mike Perelman like IT being hijacked by the phone companies to
fit their business plan, all the way back in history something comes
along like writing, like cuneiform writing, which could be a 'peoples'
tool but has to be shaped by ruling class needs.  Well we can see in
the U.S. that the phone companies are mounting a campaign to squeeze
profit from every bit of text we type.  That interferes with what the
people would use the internet for like our little conversations here.
Intrinsic to Marx is the communal redistribution of resources and
property which underlies the proper development of Information
Technology.
thanks,
Doyle Saylor

Reply via email to