The Warsh article is also relevant to the gatekeepers thread.

Yet a recent paper by Stephen Wu, an assistant professor of economics
at Hamilton College, found that nearly half the pages published in the
QJE between 2000 and 2003 (47 percent) came from authors affiliated
with one of five elite institutions -- Harvard, MIT, Chicago, Princeton
and Stanford.  The same five schools accounted for 29 percent of the
pages of the JPE and 22 percent of the AER during the same period.

Perhaps the cleverest economists in all of economics were already
concentrated at those institutions, Wu wrote, in which case the
distribution was warranted. But that didn't explain the great disparity
between the QJE and the other two journals -- nor did it shed light on
why the trend of concentration, which had declined between 1950 and
1989 in both the QJE and the JPE, had been reversed.

During Shleifer's tenure at the QJE, the four top institution's share
of its pages more than doubled, to 43 percent from 19 percent.
Conversations with leading theorists elsewhere have found open scorn
for the QJE's policies during his reign. It would require a reportorial
effort of the scale and depth in which The Wall Street Journal
specializes to clarify these issues and pin them down. But, just for
example, among the ten articles in the current issue of the QJE are
papers co-authored by two of the journal's three editors, Harvard
professors Glaser and Robert Barro, and a third article by Shleifer as
well.  Shleifer, meanwhile, has moved on to edit the Journal of
Economic Perspectives for the American Economic Association, a position
of, if anything, even greater power.



--
Michael Perelman
Economics Department
California State University
Chico, CA 95929

Tel. 530-898-5321
E-Mail michael at ecst.csuchico.edu

Reply via email to