Who was Meyer?  I ask because Marx's description of his book sounds like it 
could be 
nothing more than a well researchered magazine article.  Did he not respect 
Meyer or did he 
not have the time/energy for a deeper explanation?

On Fri, Apr 14, 2006 at 02:35:04PM -0400, michael a. lebowitz wrote:
> 
> 
> >Volume I comprises the ‘Process of Production of 
> >Capital’. As well as setting out the general 
> >theory, I examine in great detail the conditions 
> >of the English ­ agricultural and industrial ­ 
> >proletariat over the last 20 years, ditto the 
> >condition of Ireland, basing myself on official 
> >sources that have never previously been used. 
> >You will immediately realise that all this 
> >serves me solely as an argumentum ad hominem.
> 
>          cheers,
-- 
Michael Perelman
Economics Department
California State University
Chico, CA 95929

Tel. 530-898-5321
E-Mail michael at ecst.csuchico.edu

Reply via email to