In a message dated 5/8/2006 10:35:22 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Plausibility does not necessarily imply proof.


On Mon, May 08, 2006 at 10:25:42PM -0400, C Ruiz wrote:
> In a message dated 5/8/2006 9:43:57 P.M. Eastern  Daylight Time,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> The most plausible explanation  that I have read for the lack of refinery
Not in this case, since the " plausibility" is connected to the statement "that I have read", which is an empirical one.
CS

Reply via email to