Walt, *In These Times* has a ridiculous, careless support of the Bush administration's official story of 9/11 in its current issue, in an article by Terry Allen -- who claims to have studied the issues but shows no such evidence in what he writes. I know of someone who has written them to see if they are open to publishing the other side of the discussion. Frankly, I doubt it (proponents of the official story typically prefer deriding their opponents).
I haven't seen *Monthly Review* treat the issue, but Yoshie would know better. Among those you mention, I've subscribed to NACLA for decades and find it very worthwhile. The World Socialist Web Site http://www.wsws.org/index.shtml is pretty good (and has been at least somewhat open to evidence of 'who done it' RE 9/11), sometimes very good. Paul Z. *************************************************************** THE HIDDEN HISTORY OF 9-11-2001, P.Zarembka, ed, Elsevier, 2006 http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/PZarembka/volume23.htm -- "a benchmark in 9/11 research", reviewer *************************************************************** On Thu, 13 Jul 2006, Walt Byars wrote: > I was at Borders todayand was looking at the magazines. International > Socialist Review, In These Times, Extra! (a FAIR magazine), and NACLA > report on the Americas made a good impression on me. What are some other > lefty magazines that are good, preferably ones that have footnotes or > other forms of sourcing. I already am subscribed to MR.
