Dan Scanlan wrote:
San Francisco Chronicle - Jul 28, 2006
http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2006/07/28/BAG7NK79HQ1.DTL

.
Note: There's a whole separate wing-ding going on regarding the feds
infiltration of the anti-recruitment protests (kiss-in) at UCSC.


SC-IMC coverage of Santa Cruz police spying

Activists Disengage from City Police Spying Process
Fri Jul 28 2006

A Letter to Council Members on the Issue of Police Spying

Rico Thunder writes:

Dear council members,

The new police policy on police spying is a failed product resulting
from a failed process.

Unfortunately, you never understood the gravity of this issue. At the
heart of this is nothing less than our rights to free speech and free
assembly, right to privacy, and right to due process.

Let's be very clear: The people of this community got together to create
a grassroots New Year's parade to replace a defunct city-sponsored
event. It was to be an act of peaceful civil disobedience with the clear
political intention to challenge the Draconian event permit process.
Santa Cruz police made a rash decision to infiltrate the group in order
to gather information for public safety reasons. Armed undercover
officers infiltrated the planning meetings in a private home, created
dossiers on organizers and others involved, gathered information about
other events, tipped off other agencies, and participated significantly
in the meetings.

Apparently, in Santa Cruz the right to free speech, free assembly, and
right to privacy are worth protecting at the national level, but when
these rights are threatened in our own community, the Council has shown
that it has neither the interest nor the will to protect citizen's civil
liberties.

It is clear that the city is not willing to negotiate this process in
good faith. From the beginning it was clear that the Council had little
interest but stilling the embarrassing public relations nightmare this
has become. This city has delivered nothing more than adamant
dismissals, empty assurances, broken promises of a remedy, a closed-door
process, and a useless policy.

Read the full letter to City Council
http://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2006/07/24/18291005.php

see also: ACLU Report Details Government Monitoring of Protest Groups
http://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2006/07/28/18292219.php

Reply via email to