The shame of America

The public humiliation of offenders has spread throughout the country,
but it is no panacea

Rachel Shteir
Tuesday August 8, 2006
The Guardian

Had Mel Gibson been arrested for drink-driving in Tennessee instead of
California, things might have gone differently for him. Last January,
a "shame law" for driving under the influence came into effect in the
southern state. Gibson could have found himself picking up litter
while wearing a bright-orange jump suit emblazoned with the words "I
am a drunk driver".

In a society where committing what used to be considered a shameful
act can get you a spot on American Idol, it is odd to learn that shame
punishment - or "public punishment", or "creative punishment" - is
experiencing a renaissance in the US. Call it the new shame.

Tennessee is ground zero for shame punishment, having produced not
just the state law but also judges who believe that shame is the best
deterrent for petty crime. These include James McKenzie, who makes
shoplifters stand outside Wal-Mart with signs that say "I am a thief
put here by order of Judge McKenzie"; and Joe Brown, who graduated
from dispensing shame punishment in Memphis to his own nationwide TV
show. But it's not just Tennessee - throughout the country,
overwhelmed judges are using shame to curb the enormous number of
petty offenders.

The new shame takes a number of guises: in addition to wearing
posterboards, which offenders make themselves, they give apology
speeches to injured parties and put up signs in front of their homes
identifying themselves as "violent felons"; shoplifters buy ads in
local newspapers and put their photos in them. Judge Brown's most
controversial use of shame punishment was allowing victims to sneak
into burglars' homes and steal something back in a kind of larcenous
quid pro quo.

The grandfather of the new shame is from Texas, George Bush's home
state. Judge - now Congressman - Ted Poe was inspired to launch shame
punishment in the late 1990s in Houston, when a rich kid getting his
MBA shoplifted from a Wal-Mart. "He thought he could do anything," Poe
told me. "But shame punishment changed his attitude. Plus the store
manager said that no one stole during the week that he was standing
outside the store with the sign."

According to Poe, of people who received shame punishment, 9% violated
probation - far fewer than the national average of 50%. And shame
punishment experienced a victory when, in 2004, an appeal court
overturned Shawn Gementera's challenge to a decision ordering him to
stand outside a post office with a sign saying he was a mail thief.

But shame is no panacea. In Tennessee, no sooner was the shame law
passed than law-enforcement officials complained that shame took a lot
more work than just throwing people in jail. And psychologists argue
that shame punishments may actually do damage to offenders' sometimes
fragile psyches.

Despite the fact that, as some have observed, shame punishment links
the US with repressive regimes, the most important problem is that it
fails to address the social problems that cause people to commit
crimes - even petty ones - in the first place. Standing outside a post
office wearing a sign saying "I stole mail, this is my punishment" did
nothing to help Gementera kick his methamphetamine habit, which was
why he was stealing in the first place.

Americans are great at a lot of things, but sometimes we are not all
that great at empathising with others. We expect people to get
themselves together, to pull themselves up by their bootstraps; we
sometimes expect public disgrace to compensate for social injustice.
Sometimes we would simply rather solve things with a spectacle.

ยท Rachel Shteir is writing a book on shoplifting and is author of
Striptease: the Untold History of the Girlie Show

mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


--
Jim Devine / "In science one tries to tell people, in such a way as to
be understood by everyone, something that no one ever knew before. But
in economics, it's the exact opposite." --- Paul Dirac [edited]

Reply via email to