Again, this is not in any way inconsistent with what he wrote. I don't see how his reported conclusions are incorrect based on what you claim, even if true, which I implicitly stipulated.
So, Palast could have written this, adding irrelevant detail and ungainly grammar: "The Alaskan oil was destined for the California market (where it would have been refined under strict CAL-EPA safeguards) which now faces a supply crisis at the very height of the summer travel season." So what? How is he wrong? Bill On Tuesday, August 8, 2006 at 11:43:02 (-0700) Leigh Meyers writes: >Bill Lear wrote: >> How is this in any way inconsistent with what Palast wrote? Oil, >> destined for the California market and to be refined under strict >> CAL-EPA safeguards, is now shut off. >> >"The Alaskan oil was destined for the California market which now faces >a supply crisis at the very height of the summer travel season." > > >Whose gonna drive their factory down highway 1 on vacation this year?
