Home for Sale, by Anxious Owner

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/08/25/business/25home.html?ei=5087%0A&en=d3f
c1c4f6a0fe72f&ex=1156737600&adxnnl=1&adxnnlx=1156638784-ijHDMmYqBELf6fmN
ZH+z5A

By VIKAS BAJAJ and DAVID LEONHARDT
Published: August 25, 2006

Home sales are falling rapidly, and the number of houses on the market
is surging. Yet each new economic report offering evidence of a housing
slowdown also shows that the national median home price has continued to
rise over the last year.

To understand how this could be happening, consider a three-bedroom
house surrounded by oak and redwood trees, not far from the Golden Gate
Bridge, in San Rafael, Calif. Reluctant to cut the price from its
current listing of $1.54 million, its owners are instead offering a
weeklong vacation time-share, every year for life, worth about $10,000,
or an equal amount toward lease of a car.

“Location and value will give the buyers a reason — this will give them
a sense of urgency,” said Tom Wessling, who owns the house with his
wife, Brenda, and is being transferred to Atlanta. “If nothing else, it
will be the thing that calls attention” to the house.

In California, the Northeast, South Florida and parts of the Southwest,
deal sweeteners like these are playing an increasingly important role in
supporting home prices. From large national home builders to individual
homeowners, many sellers are offering thousands of dollars in perks,
including straight cash, so they do not have to slice deeply into asking
prices.

But these discounts are almost entirely missing from the statistics on
new-home prices reported by the government and on existing-home prices
reported by the National Association of Realtors. As a result, home
prices may now be falling, despite what the official numbers show, many
economists say. 
The use of rebates helps home builders and individual sellers by making
the real estate market look healthier than it may truly be and by
preventing a snowballing decline in home prices. It also keeps
commissions for real estate agents higher than they would otherwise be. 

In July, the national median price — half sold for more and half for
less — of a newly built home was $230,000, the Commerce Department said
yesterday. That is 0.3 percent higher than the median price a year ago.
The number of new-home sales fell 21.6 percent over the last year, with
the sharpest drop occurring in the Northeast.

On Wednesday, the Realtor group reported that the median price of
existing homes was also $230,000 in July, up 0.9 percent from a year
earlier. 
Mark Zandi, the chief economist of Moody’s Economy.com, estimated that
incentives might now be equal to as much as 3 percent of the effective
prices of houses across the country, on average. But he and other
economists said there was simply no way to know for certain.

“We don’t have any house price indexes that get it right,” said Todd
Sinai, an associate professor of real estate at the Wharton School of
the University of Pennsylvania. 

“Sellers are pretty picky,” he added. “They are not willing to lower
prices enough in downturns; they don’t do it very quickly.” Their
reluctance delays sales, contributes to rising inventories and allows
prices on the remaining transactions to show an annual increase.

Incentives are most common in the new-home market, where builders are
under financial pressure to sell empty homes and, as large businesses,
have the ability to absorb the financial hit. Depending on the market,
executives at the nation’s biggest builders say the giveaways can equal
3 percent to 8 percent of a home’s sale price. If builders instead
reduced asking prices by that much, it would be enough to wipe out the
year-over-year price gains in many markets. Last year, by contrast, many
builders were selling out new subdivisions and condominiums in hours or
days, often in auctions. 

“If you were going to sell the house exactly the way it was before, you
would be looking at a price decline,” said David Seiders, chief
economist at the National Association of Home Builders.

But in a sign of the housing market’s deterioration, creative — and
expensive — lures are also becoming more common in the existing-home
market. With many houses languishing on the market for months, buyers
often have the leverage to request a last-minute concession of a few
thousand dollars, or more, as a prerequisite to a sale. The subsidy
often comes in the form of a discount on the amount of cash a seller
must pay at closing.

“It’s using a little psychology,” said Frank Borges LLosa , who owns
Frankly Realty in northern Virginia, an agency that mainly represents
buyers. “It makes it sometimes appear like I’m offering a higher price.”

Mr. LLosa recently analyzed records for condominiums in one Virginia ZIP
code and found that the use of subsidies had soared since last year,
when they were almost nonexistent. In Arlington, 14 condominiums had
sold for $350,000 to $550,000 since June 1, and 10 of them included a
subsidy from the seller to the buyer. The average subsidy was more than
$7,000. 

The Wesslings of San Rafael have cut the price of their house twice, by
a total of $160,000, since they put it on the market in May. Mr.
Wessling, a marketing executive, believes the home is now “competitively
priced” and hopes the perks, which also include a $10,000 reward for
referring a qualified buyer, will be enough to clinch a deal.

Mr. Zandi, the economist, said he believed that the use of perks was now
approaching its peak and that sellers would soon be forced to cut list
prices more heavily. He predicted that the home-price data released by
the Realtors association would show a year-over-year decline, relative
to the same month a year earlier, before the end of this year. If so,
that would be the first such drop since 1993. The Realtors have never
reported a drop in the annual average of national home prices, a fact
frequently cited by real estate analysts. 

“The reason the Realtors’ data has never showed an outright decline”
before, he said, “might be that they’re not measuring the effective
price.”
Lawrence Yun, a senior economist with the Realtors group, said that in
markets where inventories had been rising rapidly — like the Northeast
and California — incentives could well equal 3 percent of house values.
But he estimated that the national number was smaller, because homes
sales were continuing to rise in roughly a third of markets around the
country. 

The typical incentive package from a home builder consists of upgrades
to the house — granite countertops instead of humdrum tiles,
stainless-steel refrigerators and stoves instead of plain white models
and wood blinds instead of plastic. At the extremes, some have thrown in
$30,000 swimming pools.

Buyers who demand discounts often get them in the form of excused
closing costs or low interest rate loans made by builder-affiliated
mortgage companies.

On the west coast of Florida, builders are advertising incentives like
upgraded countertops, interest rate promotions and cash rebates totaling
$40,000, or 6.6 percent to 8 percent of the sales price, on homes that
sell for $500,000 to $600,000, said John Dew, a real estate agent in
Naples.
Builders tend to choose discounts because they worry that reductions in
the list price would send a clear signal that the market is in trouble,
potentially angering previous buyers and emboldening future customers.

“They already sold the same product to the guy next door and if they
reduce the price he is going to scream,” Mr. Dew said. He added that
many builders were also offering agents bonuses worth tens of thousands
of dollars in finders’ fees for bringing in buyers.

In effect, the incentives have become a quiet way to cut the price of
houses without further damaging the market. Sellers “don’t want to
create this environment of fear in the market that prices are going
down, so you should wait to buy,” said Dean Baker, co-director of the
Center for Economic Policy Research in Washington, who believes that
prices will fall in coming years.
Incentives are often most substantial on homes built on speculation
before a sales contract has been signed, or on properties that buyers
have walked away from after signing a contract. Big builders report that
cancellation rates are running as high as a third of new sales, compared
with about 20 percent or less a year ago.

Pulte Homes, for instance, was recently offering unspecified incentives
totaling as much as $10,000 on homes in a Connecticut development to
buyers who were willing to move in before school started. In the spring,
Centex Homes ran a “24-hour sale” in Southern California where buyers
who agreed to purchase within the day could get a $100,000 discount. It
ran a similar offer for a $60,000 discount in Atlanta.

Lenders are also wary of incentives. Lenders do not want to finance
transactions where the sales price exceeds the true value of the home.
Fannie Mae, the large buyer of mortgages, requires disclosure of perks
and it caps them on a sliding scale from 2 percent to 9 percent of
selling prices, depending on whether buyers will live in the home and
based on the size of the down payment. The concerns of lenders will
eventually limit the size of incentives in home sales, said Anthony
Hsieh, president of LendingTree.com, the Web loan site. Many buyers may
also balk because their property taxes will be based on the sales price
listed on the contract.

Eventually, buyers will realize “there is no free lunch,” he said.
“There is a reason it’s being given away.”

-------------------

Jayson Funke

Graduate School of Geography
Clark University
950 Main Street
Worcester, MA 01610
 

Reply via email to