Greetings Economists,

On Aug 27, 2006, at 7:21 AM, ravi wrote:

Being much more of that much-maligned persuasion called
"relativism" than anyone I know, I do see value in reading all
alternatives as possible. Even "Creationism vindicated".

Doyle;
The brain being a network structure supports a relativistic
interpretation of knowledge.  So in the long run some sort of
relativism must prevail.

In so far as Doug is concerned, I've seen this complaint about his
short comments before.   One can guess having seen it continue for so
long that he won't change, and it's not likely that we we'll see more
in depth writing like I think a great many would like to see.

So ignoring a knowledge production flaw (in my view) I'll return to
your comment about relativism.  A state encompasses a great many points
of view.  That is relativistic, but power rests usually in some well
defined hands though views will diverge in any case of mechanism of
unity.  Sartre admired the Soviets for their unity.  I think Sartre
considered that in the sense that social change emerges in revolutions
out of the ashes of the old order, and social change of that sort is
represented by a new sort of agreement shared amongst people about what
society is or is not.

The technology like Google search engines allow us to re-combine
writing from any period.  Whatever recombination might arise,
Technology 'combination' suggests that all that raw knowledge needs
unification of some sort.  That could easily be seen as relativistic as
well as Marx would have had Historical Materialism teach us.  So that
documents are not written by smart guys, but converge into a unified
whole that represents a stable 'whole' compared to other versions such
as the conflict between Feudal Monarchs and the Capitalists might show
us.  Or that the global environment is really the totality of living
processes upon the material bed of the local universe.

Certain other technologies suggest similar results.  Big data capacity
storage allows us to think all speech can be recorded.  Mathematical
solutions of the cocktail party problem
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cocktail_party_problem suggest that as
well.  The law as it is practiced suggests too that 'judgment' is a
combination of opinions over time.  Care taking like Mothers engage in
suggests social combination not dictatorship of the Mother over
children.  Such that a happy child is the happy circumstance of loving
environment around them.

Or the platitudinous thought suggests that.  Global positioning,
knowing where one is at all times is not necessarily a language
ability.  When people have Alzheimer's they develop 'motion blindness'
in which they can't remember paths to follow to a target like their
home.  So we want to consider not just a verbal 'whole', but a
knowledge whole.

In that case for example where many people participate in a list, is
that a Bayes Net (directed knowledge) like knowledge (
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bayes_net ) that in itself is valuable as
a relativistic combinatorial milieu which is good enough to supplant
'flaws' in knowledge production ability.
thanks,
Doyle Saylor

network communications in a scalable environment:
http://www.cse.ucsc.edu/labs/ccrg/projects/wings.html

Reply via email to