Jim,
Are playing with those of us who think Bush's conspiracy theory of 9-11 is
worthless? It looks to me like you now want to apply "conspiracy theory"
all over the place, as if those who think that theory is nuts are, well,
"nuts" ourselves (as CounterPunch would like people to believe).
Anyway, I'm working on a co-authored paper for the Amherst conference at
the end of the month on "Marxism and 9-11".
Fyi, a great 1-1/2 hour video on 3 WTC demolitions is available one line
at
http://www.911weknow.com/911-mysteries-movie.html
For example, if the WTC "pancaked" why didn't the 47-vertical core beams
remain? Much more.
Paul Z.
**************************************************************************
THE HIDDEN HISTORY OF 9-11-2001 --"a benchmark in 9/11 research", review
Volume 23 (2006), RESEARCH IN POLITICAL ECONOMY, P. Zarembka, ed, Elsevier
*********************** http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/PZarembka
From: Jim Devine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: here's a conspiracy theory
>From SLATE: Speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives Dennis
>Hastert, in an interview with the Chicago Tribune last night, remained
combative, questioning Fordham's truthfulness and saying that resigning
would be "exactly what our opponents would like to have happen."
[Kirk Fordham, formerly a long-serving top aide to Mark Foley, said
that he met with the speaker's powerful chief of staff, Scott Palmer,
several years ago to ask him to rein in Foley's "way too friendly"
behavior with pages.]
> "When the base finds out who's feeding this monster, they're not going
to be happy," Hastert told the paper. "The people who want to see this
thing blow up are ABC News and a lot of Democratic operatives, people
funded by George Soros."<
the puppet-master, Soros, will soon be the power behind the throne,
telling Bush what to say through his radio receiver!
