On 10/7/06, Paul Zarembka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jim D. initially suggested integrating psychological into conspiracy
issues, then, when questioned, thought it not the best choice.

no, what I wrongly suggested should be integrated was psychology and
Marxian political economy. In general, I think that's a good idea, but
doesn't seem to say anything important about conspiracies.
--
Jim Devine / "it is all the more clear what we have to accomplish at
present: I am referring to ruthless criticism of all that exists,
ruthless both in the sense of not being afraid of the results it
arrives at and in the sense of being just as little afraid of conflict
with the powers that be." -- KM

Reply via email to