To help or not help
To attract attention or not to attract attention

Below, an article in one of the biggest newspapers in sub-Saharan Africa,
The Nation, of the powerful The Nation Group of newspapers of Kenya. 

To me the most telling is the statement concerning reaction in Malawi to the
adoption that "If one had called for similar action to protest corruption,
it’s doubtful so many of them would have signed up".

The same would apply in the rest of the world to protests against global
worming, legislative reform, care for the aged/ poor etc. But put a child
and a star into the mix, and you have a public+media-made Hollywood event on
your hands

Rui
______________________________________________________________


Give Madonna all Africa's orphans (comment)

Nation (Kenya), by Charles Onyango-Obbo
October 19, 2006

It is surprising just how big a controversy pop superstar Madonna’s adoption
of a 13-month-old Malawian boy has kicked up in the international media.

At home, an attempt by group of 67 Malawian non-governmental organisations
to stop the adoption of David Banda was overruled by the High Court. If one
had called for similar action to protest corruption, it’s doubtful so many
of them would have signed up.



There is outrage outside Africa too. Mr Mick Hume, a columnist in The Times
of London, wrote that: "If Madonna wants to show how much she cares for
African orphans, why can’t she just wear a plastic wristband like every
other moral poseur, instead of being photographed wearing a Malawian baby on
her back in a native sling? An African baby seems to be the latest celebrity
accessory."

Celebrities (Bob Geldof, Bono, actress Angelina Jolie and the rest of the
do-good crowd ), he wrote, are "treating the whole of Africa as a helpless
baby to be adopted by Western parents. Madonna’s child charity is called
'Raising Malawi', as if the country were a toddler to carry on her back."

Ms Marie Staunton, of the charity Plan UK, writing in The Guardian, argued
that it was not enough for pop stars to adopt the millions of orphans on the
continent.

"It is grandmothers – often in their late thirties or forties – who
throughout Africa are providing the love and care that Aids orphans need. 
"They survive on meagre wages and yet they care for their grandchildren –
(as) they cope with their own chronic illnesses, arthritis, and
hypertension.

It is these women, with more and more mouths to feed, who need our help. By
providing them with chickens and goats to make a living and support the
children in their care, or even a small child benefit, we could give just
not one child the chance for a better life, but every child in Malawi a
future.

Understandably Banda's father, Yohame Banda, a farmer who put his son in an
orphanage after his mother died giving birth, isn’t thinking of all Malawi
‘s children, but his own. He accused the NGOs of being "jealous of my son".

"What's their interest? I want Banda to have a bright future, not to live in
this poverty," he told The Associated Press.

I doubt the NGOs are being jealous, but one suspects they’re being
hypocritical. The majority of NGOs in Africa are funded by money from
international charities and Western donors like Madonna. And, as they
campaign that Banda should remain in Malawi, the children of the fat cats
who head these NGOs are probably going to the best private schools in Malawi
and abroad. And possibly none of these people has adopted an orphan.

The question of orphans in Africa, though, is bigger than the Madonna flap
indicates. Africa, the world’s poorest continent, has an estimated 43
million orphans, mostly because of Aids and conflict. Ethiopia alone has
about five million orphans, who are now costing the government more than is
spent each year on health or education. 

Faced with this crisis, the head of Ethiopia’s child adoption unit
illustrates how difficult the choices people confronted with the problem
have to make. He told The Times that the number of foreign adoption agencies
in the capital, Addis Ababa, had grown from four to more than a dozen in
less than two years.

"It is a difficult choice," he said. "Who are we to deny them [the orphans]
the chance of an education and better life? Who are we to send them
[adoption agencies] away?"

The reality is that babies, as The Times notes, have become Africa’s fastest
growing export. They haven’t been attended by the kind of protests we have
seen over the adoption of Banda because, well, Madonna was not adopting
them. 

The value of the current noise is it gives critics some good easy publicity,
but they cannot claim that they have only just discovered that Westerners
are snapping up African children. This therefore isn’t about "baby" Banda
per se. There’s also a lot of liberal Western guilt over the adoption of
African children, partly because of history. Had Banda been a poor Romanian
child, the adoption would have raised less dust. 

However the most objectionable is that a white woman adopting black African
children conjures images of a "native" being bought as if it was during the
slave trade – except this time, the "slave trader" is wearing designer
clothes, and has left something behind to placate the people: Madonna's
charity is setting up an orphanage for up to 4,000 children, and the singer
has said she wants to raise at least $3 million (Sh216m) for programmes to
support Aids orphans. 

Another source of controversy derives from the media and NGOs’ distrust of
rich and powerful people. Were Madonna a humble Baptist minister from
Leicester, she would have carted David away without even a single letter in
the press.

Many people who consider themselves progressive sit uncomfortably in this
world, because it gives those with education, good jobs, and influence a lot
of power over the poor and weak.  It gives Madonna the influence to
fast-track the adoption of Banda, and it gives NGO careerists and
journalists the clout to influence public opinion and action. By criticising
people like Madonna, they will perpetuate the fiction that they are
different. They aren’t.

This also leads them to project suffering and poverty as something noble,
hence Ms Staunton’s suggestion that the poor women caring for Aids orphans
in African villages are necessarily better mothers than Madonna. However,
the reason they and everyone else work long hours, and spend so much money
buying a good education for their children, are so that they can be
successful and avoid Banda's fate. They know that it makes all the
difference if you are rich and successful. 

There are no easy solutions to the orphan crisis in Africa, but as happens
to so many such children, if Banda hadn’t been adopted, he would probably
have been murdered on the streets of Lilongwe by a mob or a policeman before
his 18th birthday.  Or he could have become one of the thousands of African
illegal immigrants who die in the Mediterranean trying to cross to Europe
hoping for a better life.

Little Banda is the goose that flew over the cuckoo's nest.

________________________________________________
 
 
Rui Correia
Advocacy, Human Rights, Media and Language Consultant
2 Cutten St,
Horison, Roodepoort,
Johannesburg, South Africa
Tel/ Fax (+27-11) 766-4336
Cell (+27) (0) 83-368-1214

"Quando a verdade é substituída pelo silêncio, o silêncio é uma mentira" -
Yevgeny Yevtushenko
"When truth is replaced by silence, the silence is a lie" - Yevgeny
Yevtushenko

Reply via email to