Just Foreign Policy News
November 30, 2006

National Call-In to Congress, Monday, December 4
With Congressional Democrats meeting December 5 on Iraq and the Iraq
Study Group report to be released the following day, peace groups are
asking people to call their representatives in Congress on Monday,
December 4. Ask your representative and senators to support a
timetable for the withdrawal of all U.S. troops and bases from Iraq
and to support US talks with Iran and Syria. The Congressional
switchboard is 202-225-3121.

No War with Iran: Petition
More than 25,800 people have signed the Peace Action/Just Foreign
Policy petition. Please sign/circulate if you have yet to do so:
http://www.justforeignpolicy.org/involved/iranpetition.html

Just Foreign Policy News daily podcast:
http://www.justforeignpolicy.org/podcasts/podcast_howto.html

Summary:
U.S./Top News
The AFL-CIO-affiliated San Francisco Labor Council, often a leading
edge of labor movement activism for U.S. foreign policies in the
interest of working people, has unanimously passed a resolution in
opposition to U.S. military action against Iran and urging Congress to
pursue diplomatic, non-military solutions to any disputes with Iran.

The Iraq Study Group has reached a consensus on a final report that
will call for a gradual pullback of the 15 American combat brigades
now in Iraq but stop short of setting a firm timetable for their
withdrawal, the New York Times reports. The report leaves unstated
whether the combat brigades would be brought home, or simply pulled
back to bases in Iraq or in neighboring countries.

Former Secretary of State Colin Powell said Wednesday at a conference
that the war in Iraq "could be considered a civil war," AP reports.

Leading Senate Democrats called Wednesday for President Bush to
appoint a special envoy to work with Iraqi leaders to bring increasing
violence in Iraq under control, the New York Times reports. They said
the current American ambassador to Iraq had too many other duties to
give his full attention to such an initiative.

Former President Carter is accusing Israel of creating an apartheid
system in the West Bank and Gaza, Democracy Now reports. The charge
comes in his new book "Palestine: Peace Not Apartheid." The nation's
newspapers have largely ignored Carter's book since its publication
two weeks ago.

Experts say it would be difficult if not impossible to implement most
of the key ideas for quelling the Iraqi civil war in a memo to
President Bush from National Security Adviser Hadley, McClatchy News
reports. Trying to push Muqtada al-Sadr out of the ruling coalition,
for example, would almost certainly lead to the government's collapse
and ignite a wave of violence aimed at US forces.

IAEA head Mohamed ElBaradei says North Korea's testing of a nuclear
device illustrates the need for a world ban on such tests, AP reports.
He also said a world nonproliferation system would not endure without
serious steps by weapons states toward disarmament.

Like the other branches of the military, the Army is seeing a marked
increase in the number of troops stripped of their security clearances
because they are so deep in debt, AP reports.

Iran
Iran's president told the American people in a letter Wednesday he was
certain they detested President Bush's policies and offered to work
with them to reverse those policies, the New York Times reports.

Iran is strengthening economic ties with western Afghanistan that
could undermine support for U.S. and NATO forces, AP reports. But
Iranian officials and analysts say that Iran is simply trying to
promote stability in Afghanistan. The article notes that thanks to
Iranian aid, the Western Afghan city of Herat has 24-hour electricity,
unlike the Afghan capital, Kabul.

Iraq
Some Sunni Muslim clerics in Iraq are reaching out to Shiite clergy in
an effort to pull Iraq back from the abyss, the Los Angeles Times
reports. Sunni clerics in Basra, Nasiriya, Amarah and Samawah issued
religious edicts Wednesday banning the killing of all Iraqis,
supporting reconstruction of a revered Shiite shrine and disavowing
"any terrorist organization targeting the innocent blood of our
people."

The real power in Iraq rests with radical cleric and militia leader
Moqtada al-Sadr, the Washington Post reports. Sadr's popularity and
confidence are rising.

South Korea's ruling party said Thursday that it wouldn't back
government plans to extend the country's deployment in Iraq for
another year without an agreement for the eventual withdrawal of all
South Korean forces, AP reports.

Lebanon
Hezbollah and its allies called for mass protests in Beirut Friday in
an effort to bring down Lebanon's Western-backed government, AP
reports. Opposition groups called on Lebanese "to gather peacefully
and stage an open-ended sit-in to protest the absence of real
political participation and to demand a national unity government."
They called on supporters to carry only the Lebanese flag and to avoid
displaying party banners or posters.

Ecuador
Ecuador's new leader promised to end the U.S. military's
counternarcotics operations in Ecuador, saying it targets rebels from
neighboring Colombia, the Washington Times reports. Rafael Correa said
shortly after Sunday's election he would not renew the agreement with
the US which allows the program to operate out of the port city of
Manta. Correa's distaste for the U.S. presence is not unfounded, said
Just Foreign Policy board president Mark Weisbrot."I'm not sure it's
in Ecuador's interest to continue to have a foreign military presence
in their country," Weisbrot said.

IMF/World Bank
Despite commitments to the contrary, the World Bank and IMF are still
using loans, grants, and debt cancellation to make developing
countries implement inappropriate economic policies, says Oxfam in a
new report. If the world is to make poverty history, this practice
must be stopped, Oxfam says. Aid must be conditional on being spent
transparently and on reducing poverty, and nothing more. The European
Commission and the British and Norwegian governments have developed
policies to end the tying of their aid to privatization and
liberalization conditions, says Oxfam. But a recent World Bank report
reveals that one in four of World Bank policy conditions in 2006 push
economic reforms. A 2006 study by the Norwegian government of IMF
conditionality revealed that 26 out of 40 poor countries still have
privatization and liberalization conditions attached to their IMF
loans.

Contents:
U.S./Top News
1) Resolution on Threat of Military Action Against Iran
Adopted by Unanimous Vote
San Francisco Labor Council, Nov. 27, 2006
http://www.uslaboragainstwar.org/article.php?id=12330
Therefore be it resolved, that the San Francisco Labor Council,
AFL-CIO,  hereby declares its opposition to U.S. military action
against Iran, and urges all organizations with which it is affiliated
to demand that Congress take measures to prevent any such military
assault, and rather, to promote diplomatic non-military solutions to
any disputes with Iran; and

Be it finally resolved, that the San Francisco Labor Council join with
other antiwar forces to organize mass popular opposition to any
military assault on Iran, and to respond rapidly should such an
assault occur.

2) Iraq Panel To Recommend Pullback Of Combat Troops
15 Brigades Would Gradually Stand Down Under Plan
David E. Sanger & David S. Cloud, New York Times, November 30, 2006
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/11/30/world/middleeast/30policy.html
The bipartisan Iraq Study Group reached a consensus on Wednesday on a
final report that will call for a gradual pullback of the 15 American
combat brigades now in Iraq but stop short of setting a firm timetable
for their withdrawal, according to people familiar with the panel's
deliberations. The report, unanimously approved by the 10-member
panel, led by James Baker and Lee Hamilton, is to be delivered to
President Bush next week. It is a compromise between distinct paths
that the group has debated since March, avoiding a specific timetable,
which has been opposed by Bush, but making it clear that the American
troop commitment should not be open-ended. The recommendations of the
group, formed at the request of members of Congress, are nonbinding.

A person who participated in the commission's debate said that unless
the government of Prime Minister Nuri Kamal al-Maliki believed that
Bush was under pressure to pull back troops in the near future, "there
will be zero sense of urgency to reach the political settlement that
needs to be reached." The report recommends that Bush make it clear
that he intends to start the withdrawal relatively soon, and people
familiar with the debate over the final language said the implicit
message was that the process should begin sometime next year.

The report leaves unstated whether the 15 combat brigades that are the
bulk of American fighting forces in Iraq would be brought home, or
simply pulled back to bases in Iraq or in neighboring countries. (A
brigade typically consists of 3,000 to 5,000 troops.) From those
bases, they would still be responsible for protecting a substantial
number of American troops who would remain in Iraq, including 70,000
or more American trainers, logistics experts and members of a rapid
reaction force.

As the commission wound up two and a half days of deliberation in
Washington, the group said in a public statement only that a consensus
had been reached and that the report would be delivered next Wednesday
to President Bush, Congress and the American public. Members of the
commission were warned by Baker and Hamilton not to discuss the
contents of the report.

But four people involved in the debate, representing different points
of view, agreed to outline its conclusions in broad terms to address
what they said might otherwise be misperceptions about the findings.
Some said their major concern was that the report might be too late.
"I think we've played a constructive role," one person involved in the
committee's deliberations said, "but from the beginning, we've worried
that this entire agenda could be swept away by events."

Even as word of the study group's conclusions began to leak out, Gen.
Peter Pace, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said two or three
battalions of American troops were being sent to Baghdad from
elsewhere in Iraq to assist in shoring up security there. Another
Pentagon official said the additional troops for Baghdad would be
drawn from a brigade in Mosul equipped with fast-moving, armored
Stryker vehicles.

As described by the people involved in the deliberations, the bulk of
the report by the Baker-Hamilton group focused on a recommendation
that the US devise a far more aggressive diplomatic initiative in the
Middle East than Bush has been willing to try so far, including direct
engagement with Iran and Syria. Initially, those contacts might be
part of a regional conference on Iraq or broader Middle East peace
issues, like the Israeli-Palestinian situation, but they would
ultimately involve direct, high-level talks with Tehran and Damascus.

3) Powell: Iraq Meets Civil War Definition
Associated Press, November 29, 2006, Filed at 4:08 p.m. ET
http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/world/AP-Iraq-Powell-Civil-War.html
Former Secretary of State Colin Powell said Wednesday at a business
conference in Dubai that the war in Iraq "could be considered a civil
war," the conference organizer said. Powell made the comment during a
question-and-answer session after a keynote speech, according to David
Hellaby, who organized the "Leaders in Dubai Business Forum." No
cameras were allowed in to record the talk, but Hellaby was present
and issued a press release quoting Powell. Powell could not be
immediately reached for comment.

4) Democratic Leaders Seek Special Iraq Envoy To Try To Stem The Violence
Carl Hulse, New York Times, November 30, 2006
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/11/30/world/middleeast/30capital.html
Leading Senate Democrats called Wednesday for President Bush to
appoint a special envoy to work with Iraqi leaders to bring increasing
violence in Iraq under control. "Violence in Iraq has reached critical
levels, and the violence is not predominantly instigated by
insurgents, but is taking place between Sunnis and Shia," said Senator
Harry Reid, who will become the majority leader, and four other top
Senate Democrats in a letter sent to Bush. "It is our belief that
coalition military action alone cannot end this violence."

The lawmakers said in the letter that the special American envoy could
follow up on issues raised between Bush and Prime Minister Nuri Kamal
al-Maliki of Iraq during their planned meeting on Thursday in Jordan.
Reed helped initiate the letter, which was also signed by the incoming
majority leader; Senator Richard Durbin, the No. 2 Democrat; Senator
Carl Levin, the incoming chair of the Armed Services Committee; and
Senator John Rockefeller who will become chair of the Intelligence
Committee.

In their letter, the Democrats said that a special envoy with existing
relationships in Iraq and elsewhere in the region could devote full
attention to keeping the pressure on Maliki to try to contain the
violence. They said the current American ambassador to Iraq, Zalmay
Khalilzad, had too many other duties to give his full attention to
such an initiative. "A special envoy can play an indispensable role in
assisting the Iraqis in finding solutions," wrote the Democrats.

House Democrats have scheduled an informal forum on Iraq policy for
next Tuesday at which they plan to hear from foreign policy, national
security and military experts. They hope that the session will help to
increase the pressure on the administration for a change in strategy
and consideration of a withdrawal of American forces.

5) Palestine: Peace Not Apartheid: Jimmy Carter In His Own Words
Democracy Now, Thursday, November 30th, 2006
http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=06/11/30/1452225
Former U.S. President Jimmy Carter is accusing Israel of creating an
apartheid system in the West Bank and Gaza. The charge comes in his
new book "Palestine: Peace Not Apartheid." In his new book, Jimmy
Carter writes, "Israel's continued control and colonization of
Palestinian land have been the primary obstacles to a comprehensive
peace agreement in the Holy Land."

Carter criticizes Israel for building what he describes as an
imprisonment wall through the West Bank. He accuses Israel of
strangling the residents of Gaza where the poverty rate has reached 70
percent and where the malnutrition rate mirrors countries in
Sub-Saharan Africa. And Carter is critical of Washington's role. He
writes, "The US is squandering international prestige and goodwill and
intensifying global anti-American terrorism by unofficially condoning
or abetting the Israeli confiscation and colonization of Palestinian
territories."

Meanwhile, the nation's newspapers have largely ignored Jimmy Carter's
book since its publication two weeks ago. The book hasn't even been
mentioned in the news pages of the New York Times, Washington Post,
Wall Street Journal, USA Today, Boston Globe or Los Angeles Times.

6) Experts question proposals in leaked Iraq memo
Jonathan Landay & Nancy Youssef, McClatchy Newspapers, Posted Wed,
Nov. 29, 2006
http://www.mercurynews.com/mld/mercurynews/news/politics/16125300.htm
It would be extremely difficult, if not impossible, to implement most
of the key ideas for quelling the Iraqi civil war that are outlined in
a classified Nov. 8 memo to President Bush from National Security
Adviser Stephen Hadley, experts said Wednesday.

Trying to push anti-U.S. Shiite Muslim cleric Muqtada al-Sadr out of
the ruling coalition led by Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki, as the
memo suggests, would be throwing gasoline on a fire, they said. Sadr's
party is the largest in parliament, with 32 seats, and Maliki became
prime minister only with his support. Sadr's Mahdi Army militia
controls large parts of Baghdad and southern Iraq, and many Iraqi
Shiites hail him as their only protection from attacks by rival Sunni
Muslims, which American and Iraqi forces have failed to stop.

"Sadr is aware of the considerable extent to which his forces ...
constitute a significant part of the power in the streets, and there
is no reason why he would simply want to surrender that leverage,"
said Paul Pillar, the former top U.S. intelligence analyst on the
Middle East.

In what appeared to be a warning from Sadr to Maliki, Sadr followers
suspended their participation in the government and parliament to
protest Maliki's plan to meet Bush on Wednesday in Jordan. Within an
hour of the statement, Jordanian officials announced that the meeting
had been postponed.
…
Hadley's central suggestion was to bring Maliki's political reliance
on Sadr "to closure" and pursue Mahdi Army members who "do not eschew
violence."

Trying to force Sadr out of the government - in which his followers
control some of the key ministries - and crack down on his militia
almost certainly would lead to the government's collapse. It also
would ignite a wave of violence by his militia and supporters in
Baghdad and the Shiite-dominated south, much of it probably aimed at
the U.S.-led multinational force. "Sadr is not going to rein in the
Mahdi Army," said Vali Nasr of the Naval Postgraduate School, in
Monterey, Calif., and the author of a new book on modern political
Shiism.

Hadley suggested that Maliki overhaul his Cabinet by replacing key
members of Shiite and Sunni religious parties with "nonsectarian,
capable technocrats." But the Iraqi Constitution requires that new
ministers be approved by two-thirds of parliament, a vote that Sadr
could block. A Cabinet shakeup also would unravel the power-sharing
deal on controlling the ministries that took the religious parties
months to negotiate. "The ministries are run like fiefdoms," Nasr
said. "Most ministers don't even come to Cabinet meetings."

Experts also were skeptical of a Hadley proposal that the US provide
"monetary support" for forming a new coalition of moderate Shiite,
Sunni and ethnic Kurdish parliamentarians to keep Maliki in power if
he's unable to cut loose from Sadr. Several experts wondered what
moderates Hadley was referring to.

Moreover, such an alliance would require Maliki to forge stronger
bonds with Sadr's chief rival, Abdul-Aziz al-Hakim. He's the head of
another Shiite party that belongs to the ruling coalition and whose
militia maintains even closer ties to the Islamic regime of
neighboring Iran than the Mahdi Army does. Finding Sunnis to join such
a grouping would be impossible, because Hakim has been a leading
proponent of purging members of deposed dictator Saddam Hussein's
Baath Party from the bureaucracy and the military, Nasr said.

7) IAEA Chief Urges Ban on Nuclear Tests
Associated Press, November 30, 2006, Filed at 9:25 a.m. ET
http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/world/AP-Japan-IAEA.html
North Korea's testing of a nuclear device last month illustrates the
need for a world ban on such tests, the head of the U.N. nuclear
watchdog agency said Thursday. Mohamed ElBaradei, head of the
International Atomic Energy Agency, also called on established nuclear
weapon states - such as the U.S. - to move toward nuclear disarmament.

ElBaradei, in Tokyo for talks with Japanese officials, said at a
lecture that Pyongyang's test showed the need to put tight controls on
the spread of uranium enrichment and nuclear fuel reprocessing
technology. The agency chief also said a world nonproliferation system
would not endure without serious steps by weapons states toward
disarmament.

8) Army Sees Rise in Soldier Debts
Thomas Watkins, Associated Press, Wednesday, November 29, 2006; 1:48 PM
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/11/29/AR2006112901076.html
Like the other branches of the military, the Army is seeing a marked
increase in the number of troops stripped of their security clearances
because they are so deep in debt, according to military data obtained
by The Associated Press. Soldiers need security clearance when they
work with secret information and sometimes when they are sent
overseas. The Pentagon says financial problems can distract personnel
from their duties or make them vulnerable to bribery and treason.

The number of soldiers who are losing their clearances because of
financial problems has nearly doubled over last year but is still an
extremely small percentage of the Army's ranks. The Associated Press
reported in October that growing numbers of Navy, Marine Corps and Air
Force troops are so deep in debt they are losing their security
clearances. The Army refused to supply data at the time, but later
complied with a Freedom of Information Act request from the AP.

Over the past five years, 400 Army soldiers have been stripped of
their clearances for financial reasons; during that span, the Army
granted 747,000 clearances. After hovering at around 70 revocations
per year since 2002, the number jumped to 149 in the fiscal year that
ended in September.

Iran
9) Iran's President Criticizes Bush in Letter to American People
Michael Slackman, New York Times, November 30, 2006
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/11/30/world/middleeast/30iran.html
Iran's president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, told the American people on
Wednesday that he was certain they detested President Bush's policies
- his support for Israel, war in Iraq and curtailed civil liberties -
and he offered to work with them to reverse those policies.

The call came in the form of a six-page letter in English, published
online and addressed to "noble Americans" that discussed "the many
wars and calamities caused by the U.S. administration." It suggested
that Americans had been fooled into accepting their government's
policies, especially toward Israel.

10) Iran Strengthens Ties With Afghanistan
Fisnik Abrashi, Associated Press, Wednesday, November 29, 2006; 8:40 AM
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/11/29/AR2006112900425.html
From cheap ice cream to 24-hour electricity, Iran is strengthening
economic ties with western Afghanistan that could undermine support
for U.S. and NATO forces.

Western Afghanistan has a newly paved 75-mile stretch of highway
between the Iranian border and its main city, Herat, courtesy of the
Islamic republic. Iran is also considering building a rail line on the
busy route, and has pledged another $560 million to help rebuild
Afghan infrastructure and businesses. "Iran is not going away from
here," a Herat-based Western diplomat said. "The question is whether
we can coexist in this region together and realize that some of our
aims might even be the same when it comes to Afghanistan."

Tehran has built 10 schools and built several clinics in western
Afghanistan, and paid for the equipment to provide electricity 24
hours a day in Herat, unlike in most other parts of the country,
including the capital, Kabul.

Iranian influence here dates back to ancient times and, while
dependent on U.S. military and financial support, the Afghan
government tries not to antagonize Iran, which currently houses about
2 million Afghan refugees.

"Our hope is for Afghanistan to be peaceful and stable because that
would be good for the region," said an Iranian diplomat in Kabul.
"Everyone wants a stable neighbor."

If Iran and the US are at odds, Defense Ministry spokesman Gen. Zahir
Azimi said, "we will stay out of it."

Local political analyst Mohammed Rafiq Shaeir says Iran wants greater
influence in western Afghanistan to promote its own national
interests, both security and economic. "The people of Herat have
doubts about why Iran is putting so much attention into this area, but
they still recognize that it is good for our own national interests
and security in the region to have friendly relations with Iran,"
Shaeir said.

Saeed Laylaz, a prominent political analyst in Tehran, said Iran is
investing in Afghanistan chiefly for its own national interests,
rather than to counter Western influence. "Regardless of presence of
the NATO forces there, Iran has been always suffering from lack of
stability in Afghanistan," Laylaz said in a phone interview. "An
unstable Afghanistan would cause difficulties for Iran."

Iraq
11) Some Sunnis In Iraq Have A Plan For Peace
Clerics want to form a council that would reach out to Shiites.
Alexandra Zavis, Los Angeles Times, November 30, 2006
http://www.latimes.com/news/la-fg-sunnis30nov30,1,4562125.story
With sectarian violence reaching new extremes, some Sunni Muslim
clerics are breaking with the most militant factions in their sect and
reaching out to Shiite clergy in an effort to pull Iraq back from the
abyss. Some members of the Muslim Scholars Assn., which has acted as a
broker between Western officials and members of the country's
Sunni-driven insurgency, worry that their group has done little more
than clasp hands before television cameras with their Shiite
counterparts and issue joint appeals for calm.

"The Muslim Scholars Assn. so far has not participated in any real,
effective negotiations," said Sheik Mahmoud Sumaidaie, a senior member
who preaches at the organization's Baghdad headquarters, the Umm Qura
Mosque. Sumaidaie said more than 70 clerics across Iraq want to form a
new religious council that can unite all Sunni factions and open a
channel of communication with Grand Ayatollah Ali Sistani, the
country's most revered Shiite cleric. Without it, he said, "we will
never be able to stop the bloodshed in Iraq."

Some top Sunni leaders are resisting the idea because they fear being
marginalized, Sumaidaie said, accusing them of running the association
like a dictatorship. But he predicted that the council would be
officially founded within weeks. Iraq's religious leaders represent
some of the last vestiges of authority at a time of growing
disaffection with politicians, who are widely seen as corrupt and
ineffective. If Sunni clerics can unite in a council that is willing
to compromise with Shiites, it could offer some hope of a solution to
the carnage.

There is political and religious backing for the venture among the
beleaguered Sunni minority - which dominated Iraq under Saddam Hussein
- particularly those who live in Shiite-dominated parts of the
country. However, Sunnis are fragmented and some association members
privately dismissed the effort as futile. In defiance of national
leaders, Sunni clerics representing the association in Basra,
Nasiriya, Amarah and Samawah issued religious edicts Wednesday banning
the killing of all Iraqis, supporting reconstruction of a revered
Shiite shrine and disavowing "any terrorist organization targeting the
innocent blood of our people."

12) Sadr Casts A Shadow Over Bush-Maliki Meeting
Sudarsan Raghavan, Washington Post, Thursday, November 30, 2006; A19
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/11/29/AR2006112901624.html
When President Bush meets Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki in
Amman, Jordan, on Thursday, it will be clear that the real power in
Iraq rests with radical cleric and militia leader Moqtada al-Sadr. In
one swift maneuver Wednesday, Sadr cast a shadow over the diplomacy in
Amman and issued a reminder of his growing influence in Iraq when a
bloc of his party's lawmakers and cabinet members suspended their
participation in the government to protest Maliki's decision to meet
with Bush in Jordan.

The move raises concerns about the ability of Maliki and Iraq's
fragile unity government - beset by political paralysis, feuding
rivalries and corruption - to survive. If Sadr decides to prolong his
departure from government, it could lead to deeper crisis in a nation
already divided by sectarian strife. Sadr is bringing pressure to bear
on Maliki to not give in to demands by the US on security matters.
They include the U.S. drive to dismantle Iraq's Shiite militias, of
which Sadr runs the largest and most violent, the Mahdi Army.

Shiite leaders, including Sadr and Maliki, want the US to cede more
operational control of Iraq's security forces. At the same time, Sadr
appears to be sending a clear message to Washington, analysts and
Iraqi politicians say, as tensions are growing between Sadr and U.S.
military forces, which routinely stage raids inside his Baghdad
stronghold of Sadr City. "It was a way to make both Maliki and
Washington understand that he holds a lot of cards," Vali Nasr, an
expert on Shiite politics, said of the walkout from parliament.

Sadr's popularity and confidence are rising. The latest boost came
last week, in the aftermath of a barrage of car bombs, mortars and
missiles that battered the Shiite slum of Sadr City. More than 200
were killed in the attacks, the single deadliest assault against
Iraqis since the U.S.-led invasion in 2003. A day after those attacks,
powerful politicians allied with Sadr vowed to pull out of the
government if Maliki met with Bush. On Wednesday, they kept their
promise. In a statement, the 30 lawmakers and five cabinet ministers
loyal to Sadr launched the boycott.

13) S.Korean Lawmakers Seek Troop Withdrawal
Associated Press, November 30, 2006, Filed at 2:54 a.m. ET
http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/world/AP-SKorea-Iraq.html
South Korea's ruling party said Thursday that it wouldn't back
government plans to extend the country's deployment in Iraq for
another year without an agreement for the eventual withdrawal of all
South Korean forces.

The Uri Party earlier claimed the government agreed to a full
withdrawal by the end of 2007. But Noh Woong-rae, a party spokesman,
said later that the government "hadn't accepted or agreed" to the
proposal. He added, however, that the government would have to follow
the parliament's position since it requires lawmakers' approval for
any troop deployment.

South Korea sent troops to the northern Iraq city of Irbil in 2004 to
support U.S.-led actions there, but has been gradually reducing its
presence. Seoul's current contribution of 2,300 troops makes it
Washington's biggest coalition partner after Britain. The contingent's
mission was to expire at the end of this year, but the Defense
Ministry plans to submit a proposal to parliament to keep them there
until the end of 2007.

The Uri Party has 139 seats in the 297-member National Assembly. The
deployment is unpopular among South Koreans, mainly due to security
concerns. In June 2004, Islamic insurgents beheaded a South Korean
civilian working in Iraq after Seoul rejected demands to withdraw its
troops.

Lebanon
14) Hezbollah Calls for Mass Protests
Associated Press, November 30, 2006, Filed at 8:15 a.m. ET
http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/world/AP-Lebanon-Protests.html
Hezbollah and its allies called for mass protests in Beirut Friday in
an effort to bring down Lebanon's Western-backed government, which the
militant group's leader called incompetent. Hassan Nasrallah said
Prime Minister Fuad Saniora's administration "has failed to fulfill
its promises and achieve anything significant." Peaceful protests
should force it to resign, he said. "I call upon you all for a popular
action to put pressure to achieve this goal," Nasrallah said in a
broadcast on Hezbollah's television station, Al-Manar, stressing that
the demonstrations should be "peaceful and civilized."

Hezbollah and other opposition groups said on their television
stations that the protest would begin on Friday at 3 p.m. in downtown
Beirut, where Saniora's embattled government has its headquarters. The
call came after weeks of political tension between pro-Syrian groups
in the opposition, led by the Shiite Muslim Hezbollah, and anti-Syrian
factions supporting the government, which has wide Western backing.

The prime minister and members of his Cabinet have been bracing for
mass demonstrations for days. The security forces have deployed
troops, barbed wire and armored vehicles outside the main government
office complex, where the prime minister and some ministers have been
sleeping in a guest house.

Opposition groups said in a statement that they "call on all the
Lebanese of all sects and parties ... to gather peacefully and stage
an open-ended sit-in to protest the absence of real political
participation and to demand a national unity government." They called
on supporters to carry only the Lebanese flag and to avoid displaying
party banners or posters.

Ecuador
15) New Leader Vows To Oust U.S. Anti-Drug Squad
Carmen Gentile, Washington Times, Published November 30, 2006
http://www.washtimes.com/world/20061129-103217-3546r.htm
Ecuador's outspoken new leader has promised to end the U.S. military's
counternarcotics operations in the South American country, saying it
targets rebels from neighboring Colombia. Even though his victory will
not be official until later this week , Rafael Correa, the leftist
economist with a doctorate from the University of Illinois, said
shortly after Sunday's election that he would not renew the agreement
with the US. The agreement, which allows the U.S. program to operate
out of an airstrip in the port city of Manta, some 140 miles southwest
of the capital, Quito, expires in 2009.
…
Correa's distaste for the U.S. presence in the region is not
unfounded, said Mark Weisbrot, co-director of the Washington-based
Center for Economic and Policy Research."I'm not sure it's in
Ecuador's interest to continue to have a foreign military presence in
their country," Weisbrot said. "This U.S. war on drugs is a dubious
proposition. ... It's not affecting the street price of drugs here [in
the US] or the quantity available."

IMF/World Bank
16) Kicking the Habit: How the World Bank and the IMF are still
addicted to attaching economic policy conditions to aid
http://www.oxfam.org/en/policy/briefingpapers/bp96_kicking_the_habit_061127
Despite numerous commitments to reform, The World Bank and the
International Monetary Fund (IMF) are still using their aid to make
developing countries implement inappropriate economic policies, with
the tacit approval of rich-country governments. These economic policy
conditions undermine national policy-making, delay aid flows, and
often fail to deliver for poor people. If the world is to make poverty
history, this practice must be stopped. Aid must be conditional on
being spent transparently and on reducing poverty, and nothing more.

Over the last five years there has been a growing international
consensus that economic policy conditionality does not work. 'Policy
conditionality…is both an infringement on sovereignty and ineffective'
noted the Africa Commission in 2005. The European Commission and the
British and Norwegian governments have developed policies to end the
tying of their aid to privatization and liberalization conditions.

Even the World Bank and the IMF, historically the chief proponents of
economic policy conditionality, agreed to use it far more sparingly
and only when two important safeguards were met. Economic policy
conditions had firstly to be 'country-owned', and secondly to be based
on analysis of the impact of the policy on poor people prior to their
application.

However, the evidence to date shows that the World Bank and the IMF
have failed to kick the habit. A recent World Bank report assessing
its own progress on reforming conditionality reveals that one in four
of World Bank policy conditions in 2006 push economic reforms. A 2006
study by the Norwegian government of IMF conditionality revealed that
26 out of 40 poor countries still have privatization and
liberalization conditions attached to their IMF loans. There have been
some improvements in enhancing country ownership of reform with the
advent of nationally-created poverty plans.  But, when the World Bank
surveyed poor-country government staff in 2005, 50 per cent still felt
that 'the Bank introduced elements that were not part of the country
program'. Finally, both institutions are not systematically assessing
the impact of economic policy reforms on the poor.

-
Robert Naiman
Just Foreign Policy
www.justforeignpolicy.org

Just Foreign Policy is a membership organization devoted to reforming
U.S. foreign policy so it reflects the values and interests of the
majority of Americans.

Reply via email to