SLATE moneybox

The Unwilling Americans
More jobs the native-born won't do.
By Daniel Gross

Posted Thursday, Jan. 18, 2007, at 6:38 AM ET

Last week, I wrote about the phenomenon of jobs Americans aren't
willing to do. If companies can't hire the number of people they want
to hire at the wages they want to pay, the reasoning goes, it must be
because lazy, soft-handed Americans simply aren't willing to roll up
their sleeves and do difficult jobs. Managing hedge funds and starring
in reality TV shows? Absolutely. But, by this logic, not landscaping,
picking fruits and vegetables, meat processing, manufacturing carpets,
soldiering, or working in information technology.

In fact, the perceived shortages have less to do with a declining
American work ethic and more to do with managerial stinginess. In many
industries, employers—and, ultimately, their customers—simply aren't
willing to pay the prices that legal American labor demands in
exchange for performing the work—or for going through the expense and
trouble of obtaining the skills and credentials necessary to ply
certain trades. In today's Wall Street Journal, Evan Perez and Corey
Dade offer support for this contention. Last September, a
chicken-processing plant (one of those industries we're told Americans
reject) in Stillmore, Ga., lost three-quarters of its work force after
an immigration bust. In response, the company, Crider, "suddenly
raised pay at the plant" by more than a dollar per hour and began
offering better benefits: "free transportation from nearby towns and
free rooms in a company-owned dormitory near to the plant."
Miraculously, American workers materialized to accept the jobs.

Last week, we asked readers to send in other examples of jobs
Americans apparently aren't willing to do. (At Slate, we're big
believers in user-generated content, especially in holiday-shortened
weeks.) More than one reader suggested that enforcing immigration laws
is one job Americans are clearly unwilling to do. Another, noting
David Beckham's latest career move, suggested playing soccer in Los
Angeles.

We received anecdotal confirmation of the trends we cited. A Los
Angeles-based hiring manager in the software business reported that he
had plenty of high-paying technical jobs. "Every single candidate is
either an Indian national or a recent Russian immigrant," he said.
"There are no longer any American candidates for these jobs."

Thanks to our readers, we've also discovered some more jobs Americans
apparently don't find attractive. A social worker for an agency in the
San Jose, Calif., area that provides services to children and adults
with mental retardation, autism, and cerebral palsy, reported that the
region's group homes and intermediate-care facilities "are staffed
almost exclusively by Filipinos." The same holds for many "special
education teachers and school aides, nurses working with those with
delays or the elderly, respite workers, day program staff." These
jobs, like many of the other jobs Americans won't do, require a high
degree of skill and dedication—and yet they don't pay particularly
well.

Transportation is another area in which demographics, the desire to
hold down costs, and rising demand are combining to create a
"shortage." Two readers pointed me to a 2005 report released by the
American Trucking Association and economic consulting firm Global
Insight, which concludes that Americans' unwillingness to work as
long-haul truckers could have dire consequences for the U.S. economy.
As the press release notes, in 2005 the United States had a shortage
of 20,000 truck drivers. Given economic growth and the graying of
today's drivers, the industry will need 539,000 new drivers over the
next decade. The study notes that if U.S. companies want to continue
to enjoy cheap, reliable truck-based shipping, the industry will have
to recruit more women and minorities, boost wages so that trucking
pays more than construction, and address quality-of-life issues.

But that sort of thinking—raise wages to attract domestic workers into
your field—is so last century. In today's flat world, employers can
choose from a global labor pool, apparently even for driving big rigs
down I-95. Meet Gagan Global, which trains Indian drivers in India to
drive American trucks in America.

How do you say "10-4, good buddy" in Hindi?
Daniel Gross (www.danielgross.net) writes Slate's "Moneybox" column.
You can e-mail him at [EMAIL PROTECTED]

--
Jim Devine / "Doubt is uncomfortable, but certainty is ridiculous." -- Voltaire.

Reply via email to