Jim Devine wrote: > > On 3/9/07, Carrol Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > ... Thus for me a proof of the existence of a god > > would have to be grounded in the premise that there was no god. > > that sounds like circular reasoning.
No. It is an argument that there is no reason to consider the existentce of the nonexistence -- of whuch god is merely a special case. The question "Does God exist?" belongs to the same realm of discourse as "Are indy race cars really disguised dinosaurs?" Prove they are not! Carrol
