The main task of Marxist economists today is to come up with a way of
helping the South end the dollar hegemony.  Anyone up to the task? --
Yoshie

"A Soaring Bankroll: China's Foreign Exchange Reserves":
<http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2007/03/05/business/yuan-01.jpg>

<http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/06/business/worldbusiness/06yuan.html>
March 6, 2007
Dollars to Spare in China's Trove
By KEITH BRADSHER

HONG KONG, March 3 — In the insular world of China's central bank they
are known as the Three Xiaos, three women with similar names who
oversee the greatest fortune ever assembled: China's more than $1
trillion in foreign exchange reserves.

The Three Xiaos are exceptions in the male-dominated world of Chinese
policy making. And after the sharp fall in Chinese stock markets shook
financial markets around the world, the three women face enormous
challenges, including a potential showdown over government policies,
with the meeting beginning March 5 of the National People's Congress,
the Communist Party-controlled national legislature.

Public pressure is mounting on the central bank, the People's Bank of
China. In postings on Internet message boards in China and in
conversations among educated urban Chinese, critics suggest that the
central bank should earn higher profits from its vast hoard — for
instance, by taking more risk and investing in stocks — and use some
of it to help a nation where most workers still earn less than a tenth
of the wages of the typical American.

Foreign exchange reserves have soared across much of the developing
world, in countries as diverse as Brazil, Thailand and India, but
particularly in China. The reason lies in powerful currency
intervention, as these countries strive to keep their exports
competitive in Western markets by curbing the appreciation of their
currencies against the dollar.

They have bought vast amounts of dollars from their exporters, giving
back local currency in exchange. And then they have struggled with
what to do with these dollars.

Most central banks have invested their dollars in American securities,
particularly Treasury bonds and notes, but sometimes mortgage-backed
securities as well. In recent years, these giant purchases have helped
hold down interest rates that American home buyers pay for mortgages
and the federal government pays to finance its budget deficits.

If central banks move out of such securities, that could push American
interest rates higher. But moving into stocks, which tend to earn
higher returns over the long term, poses market risks, as central
banks carefully noted recently as the markets fell.

Some of the comments on Chinese Internet boards have been unusually
strident. They have criticized the government for helping American
taxpayers and home owners by investing hundreds of billions of dollars
in Treasury debt and other securities instead of spending the money at
home.

"China has huge amounts of foreign reserves; why doesn't the
government put more of it into education?" one posting this winter
said.

Doubling the investment return on China's foreign currency reserves,
to 8 percent from 4 percent, would generate enough money to triple the
nation's education budget, said Tao Dong, the chief Asia economist at
Credit Suisse. "Enhancing returns on the foreign exchange," he said,
"is natural and expected by the Chinese people."

Yet spending the United States dollars on education and other domestic
programs is not a simple task. The central bank would have to sell
some of those dollars to buy the Chinese currency, the yuan, to be
able to spend it on schools.

But in buying so many yuan, the central bank would nudge up the
currency's exchange value. That would make Chinese exports more
expensive — something the bank has tried to prevent.

On top of that, it has already had to borrow yuan — by issuing bonds —
to buy the dollars from exporters, and the bank would struggle to
repay debts if it then spent its reserves on social programs.

The Chinese government may be poised to respond to the criticism later
this month after it formally sets up a new investment agency, several
people close to the government's planning said.

Having invested for decades in the same Treasury securities that most
governments purchase, China is now preparing to begin investing public
money in stocks, corporate bonds and even commodities like oil and
possibly strategic metals.

"That management has to be extremely professional," said Rajat M. Nag,
managing director general of the Asian Development Bank, alluding to
central bank fund managers of numerous countries. "And I don't think
it can be done by bureaucrats."

Both South Korea, which is preparing to move in the same direction,
and China are trying in part to emulate the highly secretive
Government Investment Corporation in Singapore. But China faces
greater difficulties than Singapore, which has a tradition of highly
professional money management and a civil service that is largely free
of corruption.

By contrast, President Hu Jintao has identified chronic corruption as
the biggest challenge facing China, and government officials tend to
have fairly narrow expertise in managing asset portfolios.

The central bank faces a particular challenge in managing the
country's reserves. People close to the State Administration of
Foreign Exchange, which is controlled by the central bank and manages
the reserves, estimated that it already holds about $100 billion worth
of American mortgage-backed securities. That is a somewhat unusual
investment choice for a country's foreign exchange reserves, but it
was selected in the hope of achieving better yields than on
Treasuries.

None of these mortgage-backed securities are said to be tainted by the
subprime securities that have fallen sharply in value, though some
bankers worry that troubles in the subprime market could spread to
more creditworthy mortgages as well.

The central bank is highly secretive about its holdings. But experts
estimate that it has a further $600 billion or so worth of Treasuries
that it lends actively to generate profit, as well as at least $200
billion in euro-denominated bonds and the rest in bonds denominated in
Japanese yen and other currencies.

State-controlled media in China have reported that a new government
investment corporation could be asked to oversee up to $200 billion
more, which would amount to roughly 10 months' trade surpluses this
year. Lou Jiwei, the man who is currently vice minister of finance,
will most likely head the investment corporation, but no decision has
been reached on the relative influence that the central bank and its
rival, the finance ministry, would exert over the new agency, people
close to the discussions said.

A final decision could be announced as soon as the National People's
Congress meeting, although the result will almost certainly be worked
out behind closed doors before being presented to the congress for
approval.

Representatives from a long list of the largest American, European and
Chinese banks have approached the central bank and the finance
ministry in recent months, hoping to win lucrative contracts to help
manage the investment corporation funds. The central bank already lets
banks manage small chunks of its foreign reserves under contract.

The State Administration of Foreign Exchange has a troubled history.
One director in the 1990s, Zhu Xiaohua, was sentenced to 15 years in
prison on charges of corruption during subsequent postings as a top
bank executive; his wife committed suicide, and he has been released
on bail to seek medical treatment.

Mr. Zhu's successor at the agency, Li Fuxiang, was abruptly
hospitalized in 2000 and then died mysteriously when he fell from a
seventh-floor hospital window.

The foreign exchange administration has become a quieter place since
the Three Xiaos rose to power there, people close to the
administration said.

The leader of the three is Wu Xiaoling, 60, who became the
administrator in 2000 upon the death of Mr. Li. She has since moved up
to become the most senior deputy governor of the central bank, and
remains particularly active on issues involving the country's foreign
exchange reserves.

The current administrator, and also a deputy governor of the central
bank, is Hu Xiaolian, who turns 49 this year and is a rising star in
Chinese financial policy making. The last of the three is Zhang
Xiaohui, director general of monetary policy at the central bank.

The State Administration of Foreign Exchange declined to allow
interviews. By coincidence, the governor of the central bank is a man
who also has Xiao (pronounced SHEEOW) in his name: Zhou Xiaochuan,
whom Ms. Wu is a possible candidate to succeed.

The Three Xiaos have very similar backgrounds. All have spent their
entire careers working their way up through a succession of postings
at the central bank, people who know them said. Ms. Wu and Ms. Hu even
did their graduate work at the central bank's own school, and are said
to have been star students.

Their ascendancy in part reflects the departure of many men from the
central bank over the last decade, to the point that women now
dominate the senior ranks of the institution. Chinese Communist Party
officials have insisted that central bank officials be paid no more
than civil service wages, so that even fairly senior officials earn as
little as $500 a month with minimal benefits.

By contrast, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, the China
Banking Regulatory Commission and the big state-owned banks are all
permitted to pay rates that are competitive with those in the private
sector, with salary and benefits totaling at least $1,000 a month and
sometimes $3,000. This has allowed them to lure managers from the
central bank, as well as Chinese returning from overseas with
doctorates in economics.

Unlike many Chinese government agencies, the central bank no longer
owns hotels, restaurants or other businesses, having been forced by
the government to divest themselves of them in the late 1990s to
prevent conflicts of interest. It is common for officials at other
agencies to hold second jobs at companies controlled by their
agencies, and to have company cars and plush housing as a result.

The State Administration of Foreign Exchange has now been given
permission to pay wages closer to market levels, but the rest of the
central bank complex still struggles to hire China's best and
brightest, said Victor Shih, a Chinese banking specialist at
Northwestern University.

"The pay issue," he said, "is huge."

<http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/03/09/AR2007030900194.html>
China Forming Fund to Invest Reserves

By JOE McDONALD
The Associated Press
Friday, March 9, 2007; 2:24 PM

BEIJING -- China will soon create one of the world's largest
investment funds, with ramifications for global stock, bond and
commodities markets and for how the U.S. finances its trade deficits.

Finance Minister Jin Renqing said on Friday the aim is to make more
profitable use of its $1 trillion in foreign currency reserves that
have piled up as it posted huge trade surpluses year after year. Most
of those funds are now parked in safe, but relatively low-yielding
U.S. Treasury securities and other dollar-denominated assets.

"We can achieve more profit from the investments," Jin said at a news
conference. "We are now preparing the organization of this new
corporation."

Jin said Beijing may follow the lead of Singapore's Temasek Holdings,
which manages nearly $90 billion in government pension funds and other
assets. It owns stakes in Singapore Airlines and Singapore Telecom, as
well as in banks, real estate, shipping, energy and other industries
in India, China, South Korea and elsewhere.

Analysts have speculated for some time that China would create an
investment company, and officials have said repeatedly they want to
make better use of the country's reserves.

Economists have suggested Beijing might allocate as much as $200
billion to $400 billion to the new company, which in a single move
could create one of the world's richest investment funds.

"They want to be more aggressive than what they do with current
reserves," said economist Mingchun Sun at Lehman Brothers in Hong
Kong.

"They could invest in higher-yield products _ stocks, corporate bonds,
maybe even commodities," Sun said. "Basically, the returns would be
higher because the risk is higher."

A shift in China's investment strategy could change its purchases of
Treasuries, affecting a market that Washington relies on to help
finance multibillion-dollar budget deficits, and perhaps eventually
push up U.S. interest rates.

But Lehman Brothers' Sun played down that risk. He said that with its
reserves growing by as much as $20 billion a month, Beijing could
afford to keep buying U.S. government bonds while also channeling
billions into new investments.

Even so, news of the Chinese announcement _ along with an upbeat jobs
report, which reduced expectations the Federal Reserve will need to
cut U.S. interest rates _ came on the same day of a big drop in the
price of the benchmark 10-year Treasury note Friday. That pushed up
its yield to 4.58 percent from 4.51 percent late Thursday.

The Commerce Department also reported on Friday that the U.S. trade
deficit with China soared 12 percent to $21.3 billion, even as the
overall gap between what America sells abroad and what it imports
slimmed slightly in January to $59.1 billion from a December deficit
of $61.5 billion.

Jin gave no details of how the Cabinet-level company might invest the
reserves, nor did he say what portion of the reserves might be
channeled through the company or when it would start to operate.
Spokespeople for Jin's ministry and the central bank and foreign
currency regulator declined to give any other details.

U.S. Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson, in an interview this week on
the U.S. television network ABC, rejected suggestions that changes in
Chinese bond purchases could affect the United States.

Paulson said Beijing's entire holdings represent the equivalent of
less than a single day's trading in Treasuries on global bond markets.

Chinese economists and media reports have suggested China might adopt
more unusual investment approaches, ranging from stockpiling oil and
other raw materials to spending more on social programs in order to
encourage Chinese consumers to spend more and reduce dependence on
exports.

The growth in China's reserves is driven by the rapid growth of its
exports, which brings in dollars, euros and other foreign currency,
and by the billions of investment dollars being poured into the
country.

The surge in money flooding in from abroad forces the central bank to
drain billions of dollars from the economy every month by selling
bonds in order to reduce inflationary pressures.

The precise composition of China's foreign currency reserves is a
secret. But economists believe that as much as 75 percent is believed
to be in U.S. dollar-denominated instruments, mostly Treasuries, with
the rest in euros and a small amount in yen.

Stephen Green, chief economist at Standard Chartered Bank in Shanghai,
calculated that last year the central bank made a $29 billion profit
on its Treasury holdings after paying interest on its own bonds and
other expenses.

But even that represents a return of less than 3 percent on the $1
trillion in holdings.

By contrast, Singapore's Temasek says it has averaged an 18 percent
annual return since it was created in 1974.
--
Yoshie
<http://montages.blogspot.com/>
<http://mrzine.org>
<http://monthlyreview.org/>

Reply via email to