Here are a few of the many responses to the Counterpunch articles. Please read and judge for yourself.
"There is more in Cockburn's essay on the 9/11 evidence: he has a brief fling at the people who doubt that a Boeing 757 could have hit the Pentagon" Is this supposed to be taken seriously? There were numerous eyewitnesses that day who saw the plane flying into the Pentagon. It is one thing to get contradictory accounts about the grassy knoll, but how do you get people to make up false stories about a 757 flying into the Pentagon? If this were a teleplay, it would have gotten nixed by the producers of X-Files.
