less than you'd think.  For the most part, industrial managers "make" wealth
in the meaning of the word implied by m-c-m'.  The job of financial managers
has more to do with making sure that the "m" element can actually be spent;
a good industrial manager can help you turn labour and capital into surplus,
but you need a financier in there because you can't draw "productive
surplus" out of the ATM.  I don't think liquidity shows up all that much as
being a particularly important thing in Marx; in Keynes it's fundamental.

best
dd

-----Original Message-----
From: PEN-L list [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Charles
Brown
Sent: 26 March 2007 18:25
To: [email protected]
Subject: Financiers' activities and wealth creation


Don't financial managers "make" wealth for the rich for whom they work ?
How do those activities add to the wealth of society ?  Why after that
process is over should we consider that the rich person owns more wealth
than they did before the process started ?

Charles

Reply via email to