Greetings Economists,
On Apr 6, 2007, at 9:59 PM, Leigh Meyers wrote:

Well it's true... not only are they liable, but if the city of New
York or the feds wanted to, they could claim KPFA was violating some
homeland security 'anti-riot act' and call in air support...

Doyle;
Berkeley not New York.

It seems to me a peculiar way of addressing Flashpoints.  Since when do
Insurance companies dictate to the left what is said about going to
events?  Well your point about Homeland Security has some validity.
There are a plethora of laws restricting events and activities because
we are at an undeclared war.  Still what strikes me here is that Sasha
Lilley who used to write into Pen-L occasionally is using Insurance as
a beard.  The Spanish language stations across the country aroused
their community to the many marches.  Go they said support your
community.  Whereas KPFA says no don't say anything, because insurance
tells us not to.

Then what exactly do we do?  Do people genuinely feel the Insurance
companies can shut down the radio stations for this?  Suppose the
Insurance companies told Martin Luther King not to march to the Selma
bridge because surely there would be injuries that they would be liable
for.  Then Martin must stop?
Doyle

Reply via email to