<http://www.ipsnews.net/news.asp?idnews=37717>
EGYPT: Labour Unrest Spreads
Adam Morrow and Khaled Moussa al-Omrani

CAIRO, May 14 (IPS) - Workers in Cairo's vital public transport sector
threatened to go on strike earlier this month if the state did not
meet their list of demands. The incident was only the latest in a
spate of strikes and protests in recent months that local commentators
attribute to the steadily rising cost of living.

"These workers' actions are a result of the crushing economic
situation," Magdi Hussein, secretary-general of the Labour Party,
officially frozen by the government since 2000, told IPS. "But with
the current political upheaval in Egypt, workers have begun breaking
down the wall of fear by wielding the weapons of the strike and the
sit-in."

On May 1, some 3,000 employees of the state-run Transportation
Authority, including drivers, ticket collectors and maintenance
workers, threatened a general strike, demanding better pay and
benefits. In a show of force, workers briefly prevented buses from
departing from a major depot in the capital's Nasr City district.

After calling for a sit-in strike until their demands were met,
transport workers were joined on the following day by an estimated
1,000 employees of Cairo's state-run Metro Authority, who produced a
similar list of demands.

Two days of subsequent negotiations resulted in a promise from the
transportation ministry that workers' complaints would be looked into.
The ministry further vowed to issue a decision on the matter later
this month.

"We held the sit-in because we demand our basic rights, which are
stipulated by law," a leader of the Metro workers' labour action told
IPS. "But if we aren't granted our basic rights, we'll call for a
major sit-in strike in earnest."

According to Ali Hashem, editor-in-chief at the government-run Dar
al-Tahrir print house and a specialist on transport issues, the
ministry will most likely meet most, if not all, of the workers'
demands.

"The ministry is committed to improving public transport services," he
told IPS. "But this can't be done without improving the situation of
the workers in the sector."

Egypt has seen an unprecedented number of organised labour actions in
the last six months. Since the beginning of this year, more than 50
strikes and labour protests have been called, with 11 in the last week
of April alone.

Labour actions have been organised in several of Egypt's most
important industries, in both the public and private sectors. In
addition to pubic transport, these have included the textiles,
construction and industrial manufacturing sectors.

The biggest labour action was in December, when some 25,000 workers
participated in a strike at the state-owned Egypt Company for Spinning
and Weaving in the Nile Delta city of Mahalla. After three days of
striking, which reportedly cost the company some 12 million dollars,
workers' demands for promised bonuses were finally met.

Saad al-Husseini, MP from Mahalla and secretary-general of the Muslim
Brotherhood bloc in parliament, described the strike as "the spark
that inspired other oppressed workers in Egypt to press for their
rights."

He went on to cite the main reasons for the success of the Mahalla
action. "Workers held a peaceful strike and didn't threaten any of the
company's assets, they didn't insult the government and they didn't
get sidetracked by other political issues," al-Husseini told IPS.

Notably, the recent labour unrest has been marked by the absence of
official union representation, with most actions being independently
organised by workers themselves. The reason for this, say labour
organisers and commentators, is that the Egyptian Trade Union
Federation (ETUF) -- the only legal union representation available --
has largely failed to protect workers' rights.

They claim that the ETUF lacks genuine independence and ultimately
answers to the ruling National Democratic Party of President Hosni
Mubarak. In many cases, along with better pay and benefits, strike
organisers have also demanded the removal of their official union
representatives.

"Our union has always sided with the state rather than siding with
us," said the organiser of the metro sit-in, who did not wish to be
named.

Hashem agreed, saying that official unions had "completely failed" to
protect workers' interests. "In fact, they have traditionally stood on
the side of the government against the workers," he added.

According to Hussein, the ETUF has always been stocked with government
loyalists who take their directions from the ruling party rather than
from the workers they claim to represent.

"If workers have no bona fide union representation to speak for them,"
he said, "the decision to strike comes easily."

Spokesmen for the government, meanwhile, have suggested that
clandestine communist groups or unlicensed workers' associations have
had a hand in organising the recent wave of strikes. Late last month,
authorities shut down the Cairo-based Centre for Trade Union &
Worker's Services, an independent organisation devoted to labour
rights issues, triggering a storm of condemnation from human and civil
rights groups.

But far from being the result of a political conspiracy, most informed
observers say the current labour unrest lacks any political dimension.
They attribute the phenomenon to the rising cost of living, noting
that inflation has continued to rise steadily ever since a major
currency devaluation in 2003.

"Salaries haven't risen in tandem with inflation," said the Labour
Party's Hussein. "And life has become untenable for most of the
Egyptian people."

In reference to the Mahalla textiles strike in particular, al-Husseini
said, "How could people be expected to work for 25 years with the same
low salaries of about 100 dollars a month?"

Conversations with transport workers in the capital, whose monthly
wages range roughly from 30 dollars to 150 dollars, seem to bear this
out.

"I can barely afford to feed my family," one Metro Authority employee
and participant in the recent sit-in told IPS. "My monthly salary,
which comes to about 80 dollars, doesn't last ten days," added the
father of three.

The labour unrest has been accompanied by numerous allegations of
state intimidation against strike organisers. But there have been
relatively few instances of overt violence by state security services
of the kind seen in past workers strikes or in recent political
demonstrations.

"Security forces can't use violence against strikers like they did in
the 1980s and 1990s," said Hussein. "Because they, better than most,
realise how widespread the resentment is."

He added: "They know that if they resort to violence against workers,
it could trigger a political upheaval on the scale of the 1977 bread
riots."

Some security officers themselves quietly express reservations about
the potential use of force against strikers.

"It's not our job to persecute workers," said one security officer on
condition of anonymity. "We actually sympathise with them in their
struggle for their legal rights." (END/2007)

--
Yoshie

Reply via email to