FWIW, my little sketch and Fred's are not really in conflict. The
Mattick tradition is talking about long-term trends in the organic
composition of capital, depressing the rate of profit. My story was
about a short period during which the OCC could be treated as
constant.

how does fiscal policy affect the profit rate (r) directly?  Folks
like Tom Weisskopf break the mathematics of that rate into three
variables: (1) the share of profits in total income corrected for
cyclical fluctuations; (2)  the rate of capacity utilization; and (3)
the inverse of some measure of the OCC, calculated so that (1) times
(2) times (3) equals r.

Fiscal policy's direct effect is on the rate of utilization. an
increased gov't defiicit raises it.

The share of profit in income isn't directly effected by fiscal
policy, since it (like the rate of  surplus-value to which it is
analogous) is determined by the state of the class struggle. However,
the government could use its budget to fight against labor.

also, in the longer run, it's possible that labor productivity could
be boosted by fiscal policy by holding aggregate demand high for
several years (Verdoorn's "Law"). Some people think this happened
during the 1960s.  If the rate of growth of wages doesn't rise in step
or faster, this raises the profit share. The 1960s was the high point
of the US welfare state (to the extent that we had one). This may have
empowered labor in a way that  prevented this Verdoorn effect from
helping the profit rate.

However, high military spending could hurt labor productivity growth,
because it's so wasteful.

On the other hand, Tony Cliff's buddy (whose name escapes me and I'm
3000 miles from my library) had a theory of the "permanent war
economy" in which the government could take over a lot of the costs of
constant capital, counteracting any trend of the OCC and maybe even
boosting the profit rate.

This list  is not complete, but it's a start.
--
Jim Devine /  "Segui il tuo corso, e lascia dir le genti." (Go your
own way and let people talk.) -- Karl, paraphrasing Dante.

Reply via email to