Hans Ehrbar wrote: > Jim, you are right to shift the emphasis from "planning versus > markets" to "production for use-value." Instead of saying > > > production which does the right thing with the environment cannot be > > subordinated to markets but must essentially be a planned production > > I should have said > > > production which does the right thing with the environment is > > production for use-value and therefore in contradiction with > > capitalist relations.
right. But for the long-term preservation of the environment, some sort of long-term planning is needed. So the difference between production for use-value and planned production is unimportant. -- Jim Devine / "Segui il tuo corso, e lascia dir le genti." (Go your own way and let people talk.) -- Karl, paraphrasing Dante.
