Is Baer correct that the military suspects the IRGG or are a few high ranking officers just mouthing the old WMD trope?
On Tue, Aug 21, 2007 at 10:17:15AM -0700, Jim Devine wrote: > [via t r u t h o u t] > Prelude to an Attack on Iran > By Robert Baer > Time Magazine > As with Saddam and his imagined WMD, the Administration's case > against the IRGC is circumstantial. The U.S. military suspects but > cannot prove that the IRGC is the main supplier of sophisticated > improvised explosive devices to insurgents killing our forces in Iraq > and Afghanistan. -- Michael Perelman Economics Department California State University Chico, CA 95929 Tel. 530-898-5321 E-Mail michael at ecst.csuchico.edu michaelperelman.wordpress.com
