Is Fidel the only person to have actually organized a revolution, and
not lost a grip on reality in the years of retreat, debilitation, and
finally overthrow of the remnants of the October Revolution?

Maybe.  Probably.

At the Encounter on Problems of Development, forget if it was the 2nd or
3rd one,  there was a great presentation on the actual costs of "tourist
development" to the Cuban economy, actual costs including the
"ecological footprint," aggrandizing more and more resources away from
those required for real, useful, social development.

After the presenter finished her presentation, Fidel was silent, but as
is always the case,  only silent for a moment, and then went on to
discuss possible solutions to the problem-- for which he found only one,
recommending it by explicitly not recommending it-- revolution.  "You
[meaning other the representatives of the various countries and groups
at the conference] can do what we did, although I don't recommend it.
You can make a revolution."  But as he went on speaking, it was clear
that he was really tracing this problem way back, historically, and
analytically, way back to the first chapter  of the first volume of
Capital-- of the conflict between use value and exchange value-- and
that development that was made by and for exchange could never raise the
overall social platform that human society required, even within
variations of  "socialist" "state-managed" systems.

Pretty remarkable comments,  I thought.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Louis Proyect" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2007 11:03 AM
Subject: [PEN-L] Fidel on foreign investment in Cuba


(This, the latest communication from Fidel Castro, is a bit elliptical
but seems directed at academic Marxists who propose that Cuba emulate
China, even though he refers to them somewhat oddly as
"super-revolutionaries". This is the last way I'd describe somebody like
Eric Olin Wright, but I suppose Fidel has his reasons. It is worth
pointing out that Paul Burkett and Marty Hart-Landsberg decided to write
their article on China after attending a conference in Cuba where the
Chinese economic model was being touted as a way forward. I am going to
extrapolate Fidel's remarks within the article first, just to clarify
his intention and follow it with the entire piece.)

Extrapolation:

What is happening with the super-revolutionaries of the so-called far
left? In certain cases, the alleged friendship with Cuba allows them to
attend numerous international meetings and chat with as many people from
abroad or from the country as they want, without any objection from our
imperial neighbor just 90 miles away from the Cuban shores. What is
their advice to the Revolution?  It’s pure poison; the most typical of
the neoliberal formulae. They advise investments which are ruinous, and
the services they provide, such as rent, are practically free. If
foreign investments in housing had not been stopped in time, they would
have constructed tens of thousands without any more resources than the
prior sales of that same housing to foreign residents in Cuba or abroad.
Furthermore, they were joint enterprises governed by a legislation
intended for productive companies. There were no limits for the
authority of the buyers as owners. The country would supply services to
those residents or clients, without the need of being knowledgeable in
science or computers.  Many of the dwellings could be acquired by the
enemy intelligence agencies or their allies. We need some of the joint
enterprises since they control very necessary markets.  But you can
hardly flood the country with money and not sell our sovereignty.

----

REFLECTIONS BY THE COMMANDER IN CHIEF

THE SUPER-REVOLUTIONARIES

      Every day I carefully read the opinions about Cuba in the
traditional press agency releases, including those from the peoples
which were part of the USSR, those from the People’s Republic of China
and others. News reaches me from the Latin America press, from Spain and
the rest of Europe.
      The picture is increasingly uncertain as we face the fear of a
prolonged recession like that of the 1930s. On July 22, 1944, the United
States government received the privileges granted in Bretton Woods to
the most powerful military power, that of minting the dollar as the
international exchange currency. After the war, in 1945, with its
economy intact, that country had at its disposal almost 70 percent of
the world gold reserves. On August 15, 1971, Nixon unilaterally decided
to suspend the gold backing for each dollar minted.  With this he
financed the slaughter in Vietnam in a war that cost more than 20 times
the real value of its remaining gold reserves. Since then, the United
States economy is sustained by natural resources and the savings of the
rest of the world.
      The theory of continuous growth from investment and consumption,
applied by the most developed to the countries where the vast majority
is poor, surrounded by luxuries and the wastefulness of a tiny minority
of wealthy individuals, is not only humiliating but destructive, too.
That pillage, and its disastrous consequences, is the cause of peoples’
growing rebelliousness, even though very few are aware of the history
behind the events.
      The most gifted and cultivated intellects are included on the list
of natural resources and they have their price tags on the world market
of goods and services.
      What is happening with the super-revolutionaries of the so-called
far left?  Some simply lack realism while others enjoy the pleasure of
dreaming sweet dreams. Others still are far from being dreamers and are
experts in the subject; they know what they are saying and why they are
saying it. It is a well conceived trap that should be avoided. They
recognize our breakthroughs as if it were a favor to us. Are they really
short of information? That is not how it is. I can assure you that they
are absolutely well informed. In certain cases, the alleged friendship
with Cuba allows them to attend numerous international meetings and chat
with as many people from abroad or from the country as they want,
without any objection from our imperial neighbor just 90 miles away from
the Cuban shores.
      What is their advice to the Revolution?  It’s pure poison; the
most typical of the neoliberal formulae.
      The blockade does not exist; it would appear to be a Cuban
invention.
      They underestimate the Revolution’s most colossal achievement, its
work in education, the massive cultivation of peoples’ talents. They
sustain that some must live doing simple and rough work. They
underestimate the results and exaggerate the costs of scientific
investments. Even worse: they overlook the value of the healthcare
services that Cuba provides to the world; actually, with modest
resources the Revolution is stripping bare the system imposed by
imperialism which is lacking the human personnel to carry it out. They
advise investments which are ruinous, and the services they provide,
such as rent, are practically free. If foreign investments in housing
had not been stopped in time, they would have constructed tens of
thousands without any more resources than the prior sales of that same
housing to foreign residents in Cuba or abroad. Furthermore, they were
joint enterprises governed by a legislation intended for productive
companies. There were no limits for the authority of the buyers as
owners. The country would supply services to those residents or clients,
without the need of being knowledgeable in science or computers.  Many
of the dwellings could be acquired by the enemy intelligence agencies or
their allies.
      We need some of the joint enterprises since they control very
necessary markets.  But you can hardly flood the country with money and
not sell our sovereignty.
      The super-revolutionaries who prescribe such medication
deliberately ignore other resources which are truly decisive for the
economy, such as the growing production of gas which, when purified,
becomes an invaluable source of electricity without affecting the
environment and brings with it hundreds of millions of dollars each
year. About the Energy Revolution promoted by Cuba, of vital and
decisive importance for the world, not one word is spoken. They go even
further: they see an energy advantage for the island in the production
of sugarcane --a crop that was grown in Cuba with semi-slave labor-- to
counter the high cost of diesel being guzzled by the automobiles of the
United States, Western Europe and other developed countries. The
egotistical instinct is being fostered in human beings while the price
of food is doubling and tripling.
      Nobody has been more critical of our own revolutionary work than I
have, but they shall never see me hoping for favors or apologies from
the worst of the empires.


Fidel Castro Ruz
September 3, 2007.
8:36 p.m.

Reply via email to