Tom is a good egg.  He was a fat guy when he was just a low-level
apparatchnik for SEIU and Campaign for America's Future.  It has
nothing to do with his advancement in MoveOn.  My impression is
he doesn't do much lobbying.  He's more of an organizer, albeit over
the Internet.
 
These Internet Democrats don't see much to their left to join, and they
want to be activist.  It says less about them than about the political
environment.
 
mbs
 
 
 

        -----Original Message----- 
        From: PEN-L list on behalf of Louis Proyect 
        Sent: Sun 9/9/2007 6:41 PM 
        To: [email protected] 
        Cc: 
        Subject: [PEN-L] Ruminations on the antiwar movement
        
        

        Today’s New York Times Magazine has an article titled “Can Lobbyists
        Stop the War?” that is focused on the efforts of an outfit called
        Americans Against Escalation in Iraq (A.A.E.I.) that was spawned by
        moveon.org. It is led by a 32 year old moveon.org veteran named Tom
        Matzzie, whose most recent strategy “stresses Democratic unity and
        driving a wedge between Republicans and President Bush.” Matzzie feels
        that this approach makes much more sense than demonstrating in the
        streets. The Times explains:
        
             The playbook for opposing a war has changed markedly since the
        street-protest ethos of the anti-Vietnam movement. Tie-dyed shirts and
        flowers have been replaced by oxfords and BlackBerries. Politicians are
        as likely to be lobbied politely as berated. And instead of a
        freewheeling circus managed from college campuses and coffee houses, the
        new antiwar movement is a multimillion-dollar operation run by
        media-savvy professionals.
        
        Matzzie told the paper: “Last time [it] was done in the streets. People
        were concerned about civil society breaking down. You have to play in
        politics, which is something we do very explicitly.”
        
        Matzzie is close to the Democratic Party leadership and meets with
        Pelosi and Reid about once a month. Last year when the Democrats caved
        in and gave Bush money to continue the war, Matzzie took the position
        that to do otherwise would be essentially “a vote for a war without
        end.” Obviously, Matzzie has loftier career goals in mind than lobbying
        politicians. This kind of double-speak would qualify him to be a press
        secretary for Hillary Clinton. Fellow liberals at the grass roots level
        were less than delighted with his position and was accused of “having
        been co-opted by the party leaders with whom he frequently rubs elbows.”
        Mattzie supposedly believes that “political and lifestyle radicalism was
        a gift to supporters of the Vietnam War that his allies will not give
        again.” Apparently he much prefers the life-style of a corporate
        lobbyist and has the girth to show for it.
        
        full:
        
http://louisproyect.wordpress.com/2007/09/09/ruminations-on-the-antiwar-movement/
        
        --
        This message has been scanned for viruses and
        dangerous content by eResources, and is
        believed to be clean.
        
        

Reply via email to