Libertarians make a case the controllers of economies are the Central Banks which becomes the sole source of making money payments, that they create money and lend AT INTEREST, that the requirements to paying debt with interest creates the need for more money, more debt and even more control of the economy by the Central Bank. The magnifying debt enslaves the economy to the Central Bank's desires.
This line of argument is presented, for example, in Part III of http://zeitgeistmovie.com but the attack on central banks is widespead among libertarians. (I get nervous politically because the rise of Nazism focused on banks and Jewish control thereof.) Has anyone seen a good analysis of such an argument? It is true that the Federal Reserve, after printing money, places it on the market at interest (if it is more than the replacement of worn-out currency). Thanks, Paul Z. ************************************************************************ (Vol.23) THE HIDDEN HISTORY OF 9-11-2001 "a benchmark in 9/11 research" video summary from Snowshoe Films at http://snowshoefilms.com (Vol.24) TRANSITIONS IN LATIN AMERICA AND IN POLAND AND SYRIA ********************* http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/PZarembka
