> >- F O R I M M E D I A T E R E L E A S E - > >TORONTO / MONTREAL Canada 10 November 2009 -- A VIDEO YOU MUST NOT MISS. > >JUST PRODUCED: "Obama-The First Year in Office & The Impact on Canada" > >URL: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FSkKDBNHzyQ > >This is a must-see video by NAUResistance.org in >collaboration with Habeas Corpus Canada who >provided the research, a copy of which follows >for your complete information on this subject. > >Re: Change We Can Believe In? Obama: The First >Year in Office & The Impact on Canada > >"November 25, 2009 12:00 PM > >Obama: A year after the election and impact on Canada > >Change We Can Believe In? Obama: The First Year >in Office & The Impact on Canada. A panel >discussion with former Ambassadors Michael >Wilson & Frank McKenna & Globe & Mail columnist >& Washington correspondent John Ibbitson. > >Royal York, Ballroom" > >http://www.empireclub.org/do/event;jsessionid=47654D5ED4FA2DAC522E957F216B7CE6?event_id=3261 > ><http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FSkKDBNHzyQ> >[] > ><http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FSkKDBNHzyQ>Obama-The >First Year in Office & The Impact on Canada >Obama: A year after the election and impact on Canada >Change We Can Believe In? Obama: The First Year >in Office & The Impact on Canada. A panel >discussion with former Ambassadors Michael >Wilson & Frank McKenna & Globe & Mail columni... >Sent to: nidder1, northerndisclosure, >ohmygawdyourweird, pondman27, quietatheist20, >shootbluehelmets, sockpuppetarmy, steeper33, >stopthewarcrimes, stratslayer, supernewf1, >thiswewilldefend, tiffanybader, tigree33, >tobias8164, toyouwhohaveears, truthiness231, >votestrike, xlpizza, zionismisnazism ><http://www.youtube.com/inbox?action_compose=1&to_users=Nidder1,northerndisclosure,ohmygawdyourweird,pondman27,quietAtheist20,ShootBlueHelmets,SockPuppetArmy,Steeper33,StopTheWarCrimes,Stratslayer,SuperNewf1,THISWEWILLDEFEND,TiffanyBader,tigree33,Tobias8164,ToYouWhoHaveEars,Truthiness231,VoteStrike,xlpizza,Zionismisnazism#>Delete > > > >Notes: that url page features a MERGED CANADA-US >FLAG, and instructions for ordering tickets to >the event. You might like to go, or you might >have contacts who would cover this for NAURESISTANCE.org > >Notes: "A stockbroker and investment banker by >profession, [MICHAEL] WILSON was responsible for >the controversial introduction of GST in 1990 >and also HELPED TO NEGOTIATE THE NORTH-AMERICAN FREE TRADE AGREEMENT." > >* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * > >THE EMPIRE CLUB OF CANADA web site is an online >database of short speeches by notable figures in >Canadian affairs. Here's an interesting view of NAFTA from one of them: > >Here's an interesting one on NAFTA which admits >that NAFTA = ARCHITECTURE OF NEW INTERNATIONAL SYSTEM > >Source: The Hon. Roy MacLaren, Minister for International Trade >"MOVING NAFTA FORWARD" >Chairman: John A. Campion >President, The Empire Club of Canada >http://speeches.empireclub.org/details.asp?r=vs&ID=60937&number=6 >The Empire Club of Canada Addresses (Toronto, >Canada : The Empire Club Foundation, 1995 ) 592-603 [laptop PDF online] > >/ >The original justification for the Canada-U.S. >Free Trade Agreement--and the subsequent >trilateral agreement with Mexico--was really >just that: to push forward in areas where our >degree of economic integration called for a >deeper, more comprehensive regime of rules than the GATT itself could provide. > >In areas such as dispute settlement, investment, >trade in services, and procurement, NAFTA has >already moved well beyond the kind of consensus >that has been achieved in the larger and >slower-moving multilateral context. In other >critical areas--such as trade remedy law--Canada >is working hard to deepen the agreement. Both >Canada and Mexico have also signalled their >desire to move quickly towards NAFTA expansion >in the Western hemisphere. Although it is >critical to get Chilean accession right, there >is no reason why, in time, all countries that >agree to abide by the NAFTA rules should not be >welcome. Nor is there any reason to limit this >expansion to the Western hemisphere. > >The accession clause of the NAFTA does not speak >of "western hemisphere countries," but simply of >"countries or groups of countries." The acid >test of membership should be a commitment to >submit to the disciplines of the Agreement and a >willingness to work together to push the trade and investment agenda forward. > >For other countries in the hemisphere, the >accession route offers entry into a dynamic, >high-quality agreement that is already in >place--no small advantage given the >protectionist forces currently arrayed against >additional trade liberalisation in the United States. > >Not without scars, Canada has run the gauntlet >with U.S. negotiators twice in the last five >years--and we are the United States' largest >trading partner. One can only guess how a Chile >or an Argentina, standing alone, would fare >against an increasingly restive and >protectionist U.S. Congress. Equally important, >NAFTA could serve as a bridge among the >increasingly complex web of free trade >initiatives that have proliferated in the Western hemisphere. > >[Notes: "gauntlet" -- he means "gantlet", a >gauntlet is a metal glove worn by Knights] > >[....] > >As for the three existing NAFTA partners, >broadening the Agreement offers more than access >to growing markets. It offers new partnerships >and new alliances to tackle the hard trade >issues of the future, and provides a more >balanced negotiating framework in which to >achieve these goals. It also offers us a >powerful tool in our dealings with the rest of >the world by demonstrating that those countries >unwilling to move toward greater liberalisation >risk being left behind in the wake of dynamic regionalism. > >[Notes: Charlotte Iserbyt : "regionalism is communism' (News with Views)] > >NAFTA has the potential to set in motion an >external, competitive dynamic to reduce tariff >and non-tariff barriers worldwide--the >potential, that is, to kick-start a new round of >global trade liberalisation. For ultimately it >is to the multilateral trading system in >general--and to the newly created World Trade >Organisation in particular--that we must look >for the long-term future of free trade. > >[...] > >But the process must start now. Canada, the >United States and Mexico have laid the >foundations for a new kind of economic order. > >[...] > >For all of these reasons, we must set our >collective sights on moving the NAFTA >forward--on building a broader and deeper >architecture. Trade agreements should not--and >cannot--stand still. THE EUROPEAN UNION was >created in the 1950s as a modest coal-and-steel >accord between France and Germany. Today it is a >supranational federation of 12 nations, poised to expand yet again. > >[...] > >As we define the ambitious agenda for the World >Trade Organisation, NAFTA could again provide a >crucible for forging a new consensus and for >developing new approaches as we seek to expand >the boundaries of the rules-based trading system. > >But the process must start now. Canada, the >United States and Mexico have laid the >foundations for a new kind of economic order. We >have eschewed the constraints of a customs union >or a common market in favour of a much more open economic area-- > >* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * > >Notes: This goes well with the Kissinger article in 1993: > >On 18 July 1993, writing in the Los Angeles >Times, CFR member and Trilateralist Henry >Kissinger -- a key member of America's >foreign-policy establishment, also acknowledged >during the 1993 NAFTA debate that NAFTA would be >far more significant than just another trade agreement: > >"It [NAFTA] will represent the most creative >step toward a new world order taken by any group >of countries since the end of the Cold War, and >the first step toward an even larger vision of a >free-trade zone for the entire Western >Hemisphere--" "--[NAFTA] is not a conventional >trade agreement, but the architecture of a new international system." > > >Kathleen Moore >HABEAS CORPUS CANADA >The Official Legal Challenge >To North American Union >www.habeascorpuscanada.com > >MY OWN >VIDEOS: ><http://hccvideocatalog.blogspot.com/>http://hccvideocatalog.blogspot.com > >* 1. Whisper (Part I): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nFMzhuRpDew >Supporting >docs: >http://www.scribd.com/doc/17583203/In-the-Eye-of-the-Eagle-The-Secret-Committee-at-Power-Corp-1967 >* 1-A. Newsletter to accompany the Whisper Video: >"Pierre Trudeau: Founding Father of the Parti Québécois >1967: Trudeau's Plan to "fight" separatism: >Create a separatist party, -and- Encourage >separatism so radical that it becomes "shocking" > * http://habeascorpuscanada.webng.com/documents/vol1no1october2008.html > * http://habeascorpuscanada.webng.com/documents/vol1no1october2008.PDF >* 2. 1968 Press Conference of Rene Levesque to >replace Canada: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vV-s0B0TmvY >* 3. While You Were Sleeping: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=khtYGYpJPj8 >* 4. Model Parliament for North >America: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aYsHm_ly0Bs >* 5. http://nauresistance.org/2009/09/ekos-the-annexation-survey/ >* 6. Whisper (Part II) El Terrorismo (Fidel >Castro, Trudeau's best friend, captured on film >just a few months after a Cuban love-in with Prime Minister Trudeau! > * > http://vids.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=vids.individual&VideoID=56217768 > > > > >---------- >Get a great deal on Windows 7 and see how it >works the way you want. ><http://go.microsoft.com/?linkid=9691812>Check out the offers on Windows 7now.
+44 (0)7786 952037 http://bcfm.org.uk/?page_id=3659 http://www.911forum.org.uk/ "Capitalism is institutionalised bribery." _________________ www.abolishwar.org.uk <http://www.elementary.org.uk>www.elementary.org.uk www.public-interest.co.uk www.radio4all.net/index.php/series/Bristol+Broadband+Co-operative <http://utangente.free.fr/2003/media2003.pdf>http://utangente.free.fr/2003/media2003.pdf "The maintenance of secrets acts like a psychic poison which alienates the possessor from the community" Carl Jung <https://217.72.179.7/members/www.bilderberg.org/phpBB2/>https://217.72.179.7/members/www.bilderberg.org/phpBB2/ --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Please consider seriously the reason why these elite institutions are not discussed in the mainstream press despite the immense financial and political power they wield? There are sick and evil occultists running the Western World. They are power mad lunatics like something from a kids cartoon with their fingers on the nuclear button! Armageddon is closer than you thought. Only God can save our souls from their clutches, at least that's my considered opinion - Tony You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PEPIS" group. Please feel free to forward it to anyone who might be interested particularly your political representatives, journalists and spiritual leaders/dudes. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pepis?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
<<attachment: 7e1aa27.jpg>>
