see also
Enron review could free Conrad Black
below

Dear all,

As what could be capitalism's terminal crisis enters ever more
dysfunctional phases, with fake recoveries and artificial traumatising
of medium and small businesses by politically motivated private banks
(and public banks where political control has been blocked) it is
frustrating to hear mainstream media repeating the lie that ‘nobody
foresaw this crisis’.

Unfortunately the vast majority of mainstream media economic analysts
are spellbound by entryist middle media managers and vested interests
from the very financial system on which they report. The worst of them
are steeped in vanity, but could their naivety be the outstanding
quality for which they have been employed? This propaganda methodology
is exacerbated because the majority of the national press employ
compliant, young, naïve and docile economics correspondents. The
archetype of which is the BBC’s Robert Peston. His appears usable by
The City as a star-struck conduit for ready spun ‘leaks’. In the days
and weeks following a Peston pronouncement it is followed up by fake
‘analysis’ by anonymous writers in the Economist and broadsheet
economics editors. Their task is to tack Peston’s hogwash down with
suitable authoritative sounding gravitas.

But for the latest economic advice untrammelled by the NATO zone
private military/financial media grid do check out the commercial
French economic analysts at LEAP 2020. They provide for free a basic
summary of their free projections and if you need detailed analysis
then you have to pay.

http://www.leap2020.eu/English_r25.html

Anyhow, there are two interesting new documents on Bilderberg.org from
the first meeting in 1954 for all those Bilderberg aficionados out
there. I have been given a complete PDF of the first ever Bilderberg
attendee list as well as a photograph to complement the famous black &
white photo, with Bernhard in the Chair, taken in the first Bilderberg
meeting. It shows the other side of the room and one can even see a
sceptical looking Hugh Gaitskell in the corner of the room scratching
his chin.

http://bilderberg.org/bildhist.htm#1954
http://bilderberg.org/bildhist.htm

all the best

Tony Gosling
(supporter of analogue TV and radio)
www.thisweek.org.uk


Enron review could free Conrad Black
Dominic Rushe New York
http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/law/article7043931.ece

THE US Supreme Court will begin reviewing the conviction of Enron boss
Jeff Skilling on Monday in a move that could also lead to the release
of Conrad Black, the jailed press baron.

Skilling was sentenced to 24 years in jail in 2006 for his role in the
collapse of the Houston energy company. He was convicted of depriving
shareholders of his “honest services”, a Federal offence that has been
widely used in white-collar criminal prosecutions.

The 1988 law that says public officials and executives can be
convicted of fraud if they deprive those they represent of the right
to “honest services” has already attracted the criticism of Supreme
Court judges. Justice Antonin Scalia called the law “mush” and Justice
Stephen Breyer said the law’s language was so broad it could apply to
a man who falsely compliments his boss.

John Coffee, Adolf A Berle professor of law at Columbia Law School,
said he expects the court will limit the honest-services fraud statute
for not being clear enough and could throw it out. “It is clear that
the statute is in danger of being void for vagueness,” said Coffee.

Related Links
Black fights ‘honest services’ conviction
Prison cell is safest place for Madoff
Black, serving a six-and-a-half-year sentence, was prosecuted using
the honest-services statute. His case, and a third involving the
former Alaska legislator Bruce Weyhrauch, will also be reviewed by the
Supreme Court before this summer. All three could appeal against their
sentences and be released if the statute is thrown out.

Black was convicted of three counts of mail fraud and one count of
obstruction of justice in December 2007. He was acquitted of nine
other counts, including racketeering and misuse of corporate perks.
Even if the statute is thrown out, Black would still be guilty of
obstruction of justice but a court could decide he had served that
part of his sentence.

James Cox, law professor at Duke University, said the honest-services
statute had been a useful tool in bringing white-collar criminals to
court: “But I think this is one of those cases where the court is
going to read the statute fairly narrowly. Depriving a corporation of
your fiduciary obligations, even where there is a self-serving motive,
isn’t going to be enough,” he said.

Stanley Twardy, a former US prosecutor who is now a partner at Day
Pitney, said the statute “has been overused by the government”. He
said there was a good chance that government prosecutors would now
lose their “favourite weapon”.

Rewriting the statute will present many difficulties for US
prosecutors. Former Illinois governor Rod Blagojevich is now awaiting
trial for corruption in Chicago and had been charged with a variety of
breaches of the honest-services statute. This month he was charged for
a second time, a move lawyers suggest was motivated by prosecutors’
fears that the honest-services fraud statute will not hold up.

-- 
Please consider seriously the reason why these elite institutions are not 
discussed in the mainstream press despite the immense financial and political 
power they wield? 
There are sick and evil occultists running the Western World. They are power 
mad lunatics like something from a kids cartoon with their fingers on the 
nuclear button! Armageddon is closer than you thought. Only God can save our 
souls from their clutches, at least that's my considered opinion - Tony

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"PEPIS" group. Please feel free to forward it to anyone who might be interested 
particularly your political representatives, journalists and spiritual 
leaders/dudes.

To post to this group, send email to [email protected]

To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pepis?hl=en

Reply via email to