Financial terrorists appointed to Britain's new government
by Tony Gosling - www.bilderberg.org
BRISTOL 12th May 2010 - TWO senior
'Bilderbergers' have today been appointed to the
new Conservative coalition cabinet under First
Lord of the Treasury and Prime Minister, former
Eton and Bullingdon Club's David Cameron. They
are Chancellor of the Exchequer George Osborne
and Lord Chancellor/Justice Secretary Kenneth
Clarke. Clarke has been appointed to an
unprecedented 'double portfolio' where he will be
ruling on all senior legal appointments and
precedents, also running his own Ministry of Justice.
Britain's current representative on the secret
Bilderberg steering committee and Euro enthusiast
Kenneth Clarke has been in government before as
Health Secretary, Education Secretary, Home
Secretary and Chancellor of the Exchequer under
Margaret Thatcher between 1988 and 1997.
Nevertheless, internet encyclopedia Wikipedia is
puzzlingly inaccurate, considerably toning down
Kenneth Clarke's connections with the Bilderberg
conferences, describing him as an attendee at
several meetings but not mentioning that he has
attended every meeting in recent history and is
one of a handful of organisers of the annual
conference. Through his place on the Bilderberg
Steering Committee he helps decide, along with
Henry Kissinger, David Rockefeller and a handful
of others, on the location, date and agenda of
the annual conference whose corporate and central
bank attendees control of most of the money in
the Western World. Clarkes job as UK Bilderberg
Steeering committtee rep is to come up each year
with a list of powerful people in the UK and
potential up-and-coming politicians who should be
invited to the secretive conference.
Clarke's love of Bilderberg's power and secrecy
should make him entirely inappropriate for the
sensitive judicial and governmental role he now
has as Lord Chancellor. This role has
traditionally been seen as 'beyond reproach'
because of its immense power to dispense justice,
or injustice. This begs the question that at some
point in the not-too-distant future Clarke's seat
on the clandestine Bilderberg steering committee,
closely associated with Goldman Sachs and global
financial fraud, will be exposed to discredit
both him and David Cameron's government. Lord
Chancellor in the Labour government Charles
Faulkner applauded Clarke's appointment on the
BBC today, calling Clarke an 'independent'
figure, but Faulkner himself was one of the most
controversial Lord Chancellors ever, giving the
legal advice that the invasion of Iraq was
'legal' when many lawyers believe it was one of
the most bloody and serious ever violations of the UN Charter.
Despite his new job as Lord Chancellor and
Secretary of State for Justice it is almost
unthinkable that Clarke will not attend this
year's Bilderberg conference, which Jim Tucker
from American Free Press revealed in April is to
be held in Sitges near Barcelona, Spain between
3-6 June 2010. Bilderbergers rightly consider
themselves to be more powerful than national
governments and Clarke has shown over the last 15
years or so know where hs loyalty lies.
Nervous eyes are on Greece right now and the IMF
riots which have been taking place in Athens.
Americans and Europeans are wondering if they
will be facing the same crushing austerity
measures, livelihood losses, foreign takeovers of
private companies and privatisation of public
services as is happening there. The colonial
aquisitive tactics which Bilderberg and the IMF's
financial elite have used on Third World nations
for years, leading to charges of being the
international Mafia, are now being turned on
European nations. It may come as no suprise that
the Greek Prime Minister, George Papandreou, who
has so starkly failed to assert his country's
sovreignty againt the IMF has been a regular
attender at the secret Bilderberg meetings since 1998.
Those that dismiss the shadowy power of
Bilderberg as a 'private' club rarely cite that
the organisation's chairman for the first two
decases, Prince Bernhard of the Netherlands,
enthusiastically joined up as an officer in
Hitler's SS. Bernhard was also publicly
discredited in 1975 in the 'Lockheed scandal'
where he was found to have taken a bribe of one
million dollars to get the Duch Air Force to
purchase Lockheed Starfighter jets. He was also
shown to have used his place as director of KLM
Royal Dutch Airlines to aid Nazis escaping
justice in the 1940s along the so-called
'ratlines' to South America. A BBC Radio 4
'documentary' about Bilderberg, aired in 2003,
made no mention of these facts. Bilderberg is
also closely linked to the wold wide religious
cult of Freemasonry with Andrew Palmer the
organiser of the last Bilderberg conference to
take place in Britain and Josef Retinger, Polish
MI6 operative and chief assistant to Prince
Bernhard in Bilderberg's early years, being shown to be part of the craft.
The Bilderberg meetings have, since 1954, asked
both press and public alike to 'trust them' to
manage weighty economic matters in private with
no press intrusion, and politely ask national
newspaper editors not to mention the meetings are
taking place for reasons of 'privacy' and
'security'. With the Western financial meltdown
in full flow it is hard to see how broadcast or
newspaper editors and proprietors can take these
assurances seriously if they have any regard
whatever for the intelligence and wellbeing of their viewers and readers.
see also
KLM accused of helping Nazis flee
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/6635677.stm
Our man at Bilderberg: Let's salt the slug in 2010
Publicity is pure poison to the world's global
power elite. So we should all turn up to its next
annual meeting with a few more tubs of the stuff, writes Charlie Skelton
http://www.guardian.co.uk/news/blog/2009/may/19/bilderberg-skelton-greece
Bilderberg 2010 found!
http://www.americanfreepress.net/html/bilderberg_found_217.html
Page last updated at 14:55 GMT, Sunday, 1 March 2009
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/politics_show/7912038.stm
George Osborne interview transcript
On the Politics Show, Sunday 1 March 2009, Jon
Sopel interviewed the Shadow Chancellor, George Osborne MP.
The George Osborne interview
Interview transcript...
JON SOPEL: I'm joined now by the Shadow
Chancellor, George Osborne. Thanks very much for
being with us Mr Osborne. Harriet Harman said
this morning, Sir Fred will not be getting his -
he will not be better off by six hundred and
fifty thousand pounds a year. Do you welcome that?
GEORGE OSBORNE: Well I don't think Fred Goodwin
should be receiving a, actually, close to seven
hundred thousand pound a year pension, for
basically being the Chief Executive who ran RBS
in to the ground, with the help of others, but
nevertheless, left the bank in a position, where
we the taxpayer, are having to spend billions of
pounds baling it out. So I don't think he should
take that pension, I think he should voluntarily
give it up, but frankly, Harriet Harman,
expressing this synthetic anger now in March, is,
is hopeless because they had a chance, the
government, back in October to stop it.
JON SOPEL: We'll come on to that in a moment, but
she said it might be enforceable, this is his
contract, Sir Fred's contract and the deal that
gives him the pension, 'it might be enforceable
in a court of law this contract, but it's not
enforceable in the court of public opinion and
that's where the government steps in.' What do you understand by that?
GEORGE OSBORNE: Well I'm not sure I know what
Harriet Harman is talking about at all. I mean
she is herself a lawyer, and the fact is the
government signed off on Fred Goodwin's pension
deal. They had the chance to stop it, but that
was back in October. Now, of course they should
look at all the legal avenues that exist to try
and make sure that not all of this seven hundred
thousand pounds is paid to Fred Goodwin, but this
is a bit like trying to bolt the stable door,
after the horse has itself bolted. I mean this
is, you know, they had the opportunity, Paul
Myners, the Government Minister, had the
opportunity. He was told of the pension
arrangements, we are told, and they didn't stop
it. So frankly, the government has been totally
incompetent on this issue, and to say now they're
going to do something about the pension, begs the
question, why didn't they do something about Fred
Goodwin's pension, when they had the chance.
JON SOPEL: But if they introduce legislation,
because that's what seems to be the implication,
if they were to introduce legislation to
retrospectively take this pension pot off him, would you support that.
GEORGE OSBORNE: Well I will support any legal
measure to try and get this pension back,
although as I say, they should have done all this
before signing off on the pension- they should
have - you know, we'd be in a much better place
if, back in October, they had stopped this
pension being awarded. I mean they were
responsible, the government are trying to
distract attention from their central role in the
awarding of Fred Goodwin's pension and the
arrangements around the departure of Fred Goodwin
and other Board members in October. Paul Myners,
who is Gordon Brown's friend, who himself sat on
the Nat West Board signed off on the arrangements
for RBS in the autumn. It's no good now, trying
to distract everyone's attention with this
synthetic anger. They had their chance to stop it
and they incompetently failed to do that.
JON SOPEL: Well if you're saying that they were
incompetent, should Lord Myners go?
GEORGE OSBORNE: Well I think Lord Myners is in a
very difficult position. I think he should be
given a chance now to explain exactly who knew
what when. Why his account of events differs from
Fred Goodwin's account. But if he can't give a
satisfactory explanation of why he signed off on
a six hundred and fifty odd thousand pound
pension, for Fred Goodwin, then I can't see how
he can remain a government minister.
JON SOPEL: So, as things stand, his career is
hanging by a thread in your judgment.
GEORGE: I think his career is hanging by a thread
because he needs to give an explanation of why he
apparently signed off on Fred Goodwin's pension
and why his account of events differs so markedly from Fred Goodwin's.
JON SOPEL: You colleague on the Treasury Select
Committee, Michael Fallon, Conservative MP, has
already made that judgment, he said he should go now.
GEORGE OSBORNE: Well I think, as I say, I'm a - I
think it's fair to give Lord Myners a chance to
give us an explanation, we've not really heard
from him except in that letter that he sent to
Fred Goodwin. He could go before the Treasury
Select Committee for example, which I know is
investigating these issues. Give us an
explanation, cos at the moment, his explanation
does not tally with Sir Fred Goodwin's and we are
in this position where it appears as if, Gordon
Brown's City Minister, signed off on Fred
Goodwin's pension, which means that all the
things said by Harriet Harman or Gordon Brown, are frankly synthetic.
JON SOPEL: Should the same apply to Ministers?
Where a Minister fails, I don't know, you could
go back over some of the policies of the last
Tory administration, Rail privatisation. Should
the Minister who was responsible for that, which
was seen as a bit of a failure, have their
pension pot slashed? If this is the kind of road we're going down now.
GEORGE OSBORNE: Well, I think when it comes to
rewards for failure, in politics and Gordon
Brown, that's a phrase Gordon Brown uses, you
know the ultimate sanction is the General
Election. You just get kicked out of office. I
would love there to be an election, sooner than
there's likely to be, so that people can pass
their verdict on whether Gordon Brown should be
rewarded for failure. But I don't think, you know in general … (interjection)
JON SOPEL: Fred Goodwin has been, he's out, he's lost his job …
ALL TOGETHER
GEORGE OSBORNE: … the very specific issue with
Fred Goodwin was it appears as if his pension pot
was maxed out literally in the days before he was
asked to leave RBS. So it was a, you know, the
old Board of RBS with apparently the connivance
of the government, took, did some discretionary
things to give Fred Goodwin a bigger pension pot than he should have had.
JON SOPEL: What about using the law then to say
that actually, if you have been in charge of an
administration, I'm not talking about - maybe
retrospectively changing the law on someone's
pension pot, but making a sort of sense of
corporate responsibility and also that it becomes
a criminal act is the bank or the enterprise that
you work for fails and leads to unemployment like this.
GEORGE OSBORNE: Well I think we should overhaul
the system of financial regulation, by all means.
And I also think, I mean you mentioned criminal
sanctions, I think this country is woefully
inadequate at pursuing the criminal sanctions
that already exist with financial crime and
financial fraud. At the moment we've got the
Financial Services Authority, that is supposed to
take the lead on prosecuting financial fraud, but
in Britain, unlike in America, you never see
someone in handcuffs who's been guilty of a
financial fraud. There are almost no prosecutions
and I would now take away from the Financial
Services Authority, that responsibility for
prosecuting financial fraud. I don't think
they've done it well. I think we need now, a
single strong body, associated with for example
the Serious Fraud Office, that is going to
prosecute financial crime, because it's one thing
to fine someone for a breach of a regulation,
it's another thing to say, we're also going to
use the criminal law and you might go to jail and
that has not happened in recent years in Britain and I think it should.
JON SOPEL: Explain to me this Mr Osborne, why is
it that the only solution to the banks is part
nationalization but the only solution for royal
mail is part privatization, which you support.
GEORGE OSBORNE: Well on the - I mean there are
two separate issues. On the banks, because they
were on the verge of collapse, there had to be an
injection of public money and of course there are
all sorts of conditions I would like attached to
that public money, so that they actually … (interjection)
ALL TOGETHER
JON SOPEL: … on the Post Office …
GEORGE OSBORNE: On the Post Office or on the
Royal Mail, I was about to say, on the Royal
Mail, there, this is an organization that has
been in the public sector, been in effect
nationalised, for you know, for ever, and what is
needed is private investment and what I want the
government to know, what I want Peter Mandelson
to know and Gordon Brown to know is that they
will have the support of the Conservative Party,
if they pursue the proposals, set out in the
Hooper Review, that of course, we will scrutinize
the decisions they take. But the overall
direction is correct and they must not bow to
their rebels and their Union paymasters. Peter
Mandelson is doing the right thing, he should
ignore the voices off in Cabinet. He will have
the Conservative support to do the right thing.
JON SOPEL: Why not then, if partial privatisation
is the right thing, go the whole hog. Would you not privatise Royal Mail?
GEORGE OSBORNE: Well I think, you know, the
Hooper Review, took a good long look at this,
came up with a very sensible proposal, that you get, you leave …
BOTH TOGETHER
GEORGE OSBORNE: Well I think we should go with
the proposals that are on the table. I mean, you
know I, we have commissioned a review, a lot of
work has been done. There is an option there now to lever in private money.
JON SOPEL: You could be a government in waiting,
you might have to take these decisions. Could you
envisage going further than that?
GEORGE OSBORNE: I think, well I think it would be
much better, since I do expect to be in
government… I hope… given that… hoping the
British people will vote for us, that we deal
with this now, deal with the Royal Mail issue
now. The next Conservative government is going to
have an awful lot on its plate and I'd much
rather the Royal Mail issue was dealt with now,
which is why, as I say, if Peter Mandelson gets
on and does the right thing, he will have our
support. I mean I thought it was very striking,
you know Harriet Harman, today was very luke-warm
in her support. She was not, she couldn't be
pressed to say, I actually back these proposals.
So there's a lot of division in the Cabinet, and
- but, it's important to know that the
Conservative Party will do the right thing, we
won't just be the opposition party for the sake
of it, but we will support the part privatisation of Royal Mail.
JON SOPEL: You talked about all that there would
be to do when you came in to government and we've
heard the Head of the Audit Commission this week,
taking about people are living in cloud cuckoo
land if they think that they can avoid massive
spending cuts and big tax increases, where are
your big tax increases going to be.
GEORGE OSBORNE: Well I have been warning for now,
more than a year, that there was a serious
problem with the spending plans and the public
expenditure proposals put forward by the
government and that in the future there would
have to be spending restraint. In recent months,
we've come of Labour's spending plans explicitly.
We have said that they are going to have to be
tighter. So I think the Conservative Party is
engaging with people on this issue and telling
people some hard truths about, about the fact
that we are carrying a massive budget deficit and
that whilst Gordon Brown thinks this is a problem
that can be kicked in to some, you know,
impossible future, we are actually engaging with it now.
JON SOPEL: And one of your very specific
proposals is on Inheritance Tax, raising it to a
million pounds, two million for a couple. Is that
an important priority, will that be, can you
guarantee in the next Manifesto, when you've got
to make these spending cuts and difficult decisions as you talked about.
GEORGE OSBORNE: We stick to the commitments we made on Inheritance Tax.
JON SOPEL: It will be in the Manifesto.
GEORGE OSBORNE: Because it is funded by the way,
by tougher taxation of non-domiciles.
JON SOPEL: Who have left the country.
GEORGE OSBORNE: Well, they haven't all left the
country frankly. You know, there is still plenty
of scope for a proper taxation of non-doms, which
by the way, I think would ultimately be a better
deal for them and to help people who have saved for their retirement.
JON SOPEL: I just want to be clear, will this be in the Manifesto?
GEORGE OSBORNE: What the proposal on inheritance?
Absolutely, of course. But let me make this point
- whether it is helping people who have saved
something during their life and want to leave
something for their children, whether it is
taking basic rate taxpayers out of savings,
whether it is increasing the tax allowance for
pensioners, all of these things, speak to a
single theme, which is moving from a society
based on debt, to a society based on saving.
Moving from a society of irresponsible government
borrowing and irresponsible borrowing practices
more widely, to a society that is that is rooted
in responsibility, that saves for its future,
that lives within its means - that is the big
Conservative argument and that is the big Conservative theme.
JON SOPEL: I just want to ask you a word about
your leader, because it's obviously been a hugely
traumatic week for him. So much of Westminster
politics is characterized by yah-boo politics,
won't it all seem a bit meaningless to come back
to that sort of atmosphere after what you've been through.
GEORGE OSBORNE: Well, you know, obviously
everyone was deeply shocked by Ivan's death and
I've spoken to David Cameron a couple of times
since and you know, he and his family are coping
with it and they've a very strong family. I think
he has been, I know from the conversations I had,
very, very moved both by the very large numbers
of letters and emails and so on he's received
from members of the public, but also actually the
way Parliament and the political parties handled
the issue last Wednesday; so I think you know,
the British political system showed its ability
to express massive sympathy with the Cameron
family and I think also, the fact that there's
been this huge outpouring from the public,
including many people, who themselves have
disabled children, or who have lived with the
bereavement, that comes with the death of a
child. You know, those, all those things have
helped this family in a very, very difficult time
and I think that they will come through it
because they are strong people and you know, of
course, I wish them, as a great friend, very well
but I know the British public wish them well in this extremely difficult time.
JON SOPEL: George Osborne, thank you very much for being with us. Thank you.
END OF INTERVIEW
+44 (0)7786 952037
http://tonygosling.blip.tv/
http://www.thisweek.org.uk/
http://www.911forum.org.uk/
"Capitalism is institutionalised bribery."
_________________
www.abolishwar.org.uk
<http://www.elementary.org.uk>www.elementary.org.uk
www.public-interest.co.uk
www.radio4all.net/index.php/series/Bristol+Broadband+Co-operative
<http://utangente.free.fr/2003/media2003.pdf>http://utangente.free.fr/2003/media2003.pdf
"The maintenance of secrets acts like a psychic
poison which alienates the possessor from the community" Carl Jung
<https://217.72.179.7/members/www.bilderberg.org/phpBB2/>https://217.72.179.7/members/www.bilderberg.org/phpBB2/
--
Please consider seriously the reason why these elite institutions are not discussed in the mainstream press despite the immense financial and political power they wield?
There are sick and evil occultists running the Western World. They are power mad lunatics like something from a kids cartoon with their fingers on the nuclear button! Armageddon is closer than you thought. Only God can save our souls from their clutches, at least that's my considered opinion - Tony
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"PEPIS" group. Please feel free to forward it to anyone who might be interested
particularly your political representatives, journalists and spiritual leaders/dudes.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pepis?hl=en
