In 1947 Council on Foreign Relations members George Kennan, Walter Lippmann, Paul Nitze, Dean Achenson, and Walter Krock took part in a psycho-political operation forcing the Marshall Plan on the American public. The PSYOP included an "anonymous" letter credited to Kennan which appeared in the Council on Foreign Relations magazine FOREIGN AFFAIRS. The letter opened the door for the CFR controlled Truman administration to take a hard line against the threat of Soviet expansion.
The Council on Foreign Relations controls public opinion by controlling both sides of an argument. The winning argument costs the American taxpayer billions of dollars. The billions are funneled into CFR controlled medicine, munitions, food, and media industries at home and abroad. The billions are used to create and deliver massive psycho- political operations that manipulate people's reality worlds so they perceive their own best interests are being served, while in fact, some other plan and policy are carried out. The billions are used to keep the American's and people in other nations throughout the world in a state of controlled insanity and eternal war. CFR members are placed on each side of the debate. The outcome is decided in advance. The side meant to lose withholds key information that would cause public opinion to go against Council plans. In the Marshall Plan PSYOP Kennan was for the plan and Lippmann against it. Kennan's side won. Years latter in his memoirs Kennan would say that upon reflection Lippmann was right. ( http://www.bilderberg.org/roundtable/NitzesNotSees.html ) TheAssoCIAted Press story that follows has been modified to identify the Council on Foreign Relations members involved. Council on Foreign Relations members Martin Feldstein and William Donaldson take one side of the debate and Council on Foreign Relations members Laura Tyson and Paul Volcker the other. Who do you the think will win the argument and be better off after the decision is made? The 4000 elite Council on Foreign Relations members who control the wealth or the 300 million Americans who produce the wealth? Why did AP Journalist Susan Walsh miss the Council on Foreign Relations connection? Is that honest journalism or propaganda? (http://content.usatoday.com/communities/theoval/post/2010/10/obamas- economic-board-members-challenge-him-on-taxes/1) Obama's Council on Foreign Relations economic board members challenge him on taxes By Susan Walsh, AP Oct. 4, 2010 The conversation was supposed to be about education and community colleges, but two Republicans on President Obama's economic recovery advisory boardchallenged him this afternoon on his tax policies. Council on Foreign Relations member Martin Feldstein and Council on Foreign Relations member William Donaldson, who date to the Reagan and second Bush administrations, respectively, urged Obama not to raise taxes on the wealthiest 2% of Americans, as the president has proposed. No surprise? Well, Council on Foreign Relations member Donaldson endorsed Obama in 2008, and Council on Foreign Relations member Feldstein supported his economic stimulus plan in 2009. So they're not conservative die-hards. Council on Foreign Relations member Feldstein, who chaired the Council of Economic Advisers under Ronald Reagan, told Obama that extending all of President Bush's tax cuts would instill "confidence" among the nation's movers and shakers. Council on Foreign Relations member Donaldson, who chaired the Securities and Exchange Commission under George W. Bush, said a two- year extension of all tax cuts would relieve uncertainty and deliver a "spark" to the still-struggling economy. Obama didn't shy away from the unexpected debate with his own advisory board. He said a temporary extension of the tax cuts on income above $250,000 could easily become permanent. "You do that now, you're going to do that forever," he said. The president also said the $700 billion cost could be better spent on other taxpayers who would spend it faster. The wealthy -- including those sitting around the table with him -- don't need a tax cut and won't spend it, he said. Then Obama called in his reinforcements -- first Council on Foreign Relations member Laura Tyson, who was CEA chairman under Council on Foreign Relations member Bill Clinton, and finally Council on Foreign Relations member Paul Volcker, the former Federal Reserve Board chairman who heads up the advisory board. They both defended the president's position. Having put down the insurrection, Obama pronounced himself in favor of corporate tax relief, so long as it doesn't add to the deficit. "That is something that we would be very interested in," he said. "This was a fun conversation," Obama said as the meeting broke up. "It went a little off-script. I liked it." -- Please consider seriously the reason why these elite institutions are not discussed in the mainstream press despite the immense financial and political power they wield? There are sick and evil occultists running the Western World. They are power mad lunatics like something from a kids cartoon with their fingers on the nuclear button! Armageddon is closer than you thought. Only God can save our souls from their clutches, at least that's my considered opinion - Tony You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PEPIS" group. Please feel free to forward it to anyone who might be interested particularly your political representatives, journalists and spiritual leaders/dudes. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pepis?hl=en
