8 minutes in to this Urquhart says that Prince Bernhard was in on the planning of Market Garden

Conversations with History: Brian Urquhart
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dfuJ4W-wqI4

Then the first Bilderberg meeting took place 10 years later in the Oosterbeek hotel the former SS Prince owned The exact same location of the 1st Airborne HQ during the doomed battle for Arnhem There are also serious questions over why XXX corps sherman tanks halted at 19:00 on the night of 20th Setember with potentially a clear run to Arnhem less than 30 minutes away. A pistol was pulled by the americans who were aware that just up the road the 1st airborne were only just hanging on and desperately needed the tank firepower


Ths features in the film A Bridge Too Far dramatised in this clip
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qaij7QYa6k0



So we had an ex Nazi SS IG Farben intelligence officer in the British War Office planning department, courtesy King George VI (having been refused intelligence job at Admiralty because they didn't trust him) right in the middle of Market Garden planning.

He must have laughed his head of when he was on his own.

No wonder he chose the Bilderberg Hotel (which was right in the middle of 1st Airborne drop zone for his first Bilderberg meeting 10 years after Market Garden and the year Germany got its sovereignty back. There were several Germans present at the ist Bilderberg meeting.





 Dutch TV documentary about Bernhard
<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tvWdOqP7srY>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tvWdOqP7srY


Prince Bernhard zur Lippe Biesterfeld was a nazi corporate spy, who ingratiated himself into to the Dutch royal family.

During the 1920s and 1930s, he was a member of the NSDAP, the Jugensturm, the Reiter SS (that's right, the SS), and became a corporate spy for IG-Farben, the chemical giant which was to become the industrial backbone of the nazi war machine.

It was in this capacity that he was stationed in Holland in 1934. Three years later, he married Holland's future queen.

During the war, he became head of the Dutch Princes Irene Brigade, which followed the allied armies on it's march through Europe.

The prince's most infamous contributions may be the betrayal of some 50 brave but doomed SOE agents who were directly dropped into the waiting hands of the Gestapo and Dutch collaborators, during what the Germans called the Englandspiel and the British called Operation Northpole.

His most murderous contribution would have been the betrayal of Arnhem. During operation Market Garden, US and British forces were to advance quickly along a road through the southern and eastern Netherlands, capturing all bridges along the way, with the biggest price being the bridge at Arnhem. Arnhem bridge was to be taken by several paratroop brigades who were to be parachuted near the target and take the bridge. They had very little heavy weaponry, and until the armored ground force had caught up with them, extremely vulnerable to a counter-attack, let alone counter attack by armored units.

Miraculously, the Germans decided to place 2 armored SS units in Arnhem, 'for recouperation'.

As a result, Operation Market Garden became a failure. Over 2,000 British and Polish troops were killed, many more captured and the rest beat a hair raising retreat across the river. The failure of Market Garden created the breathing space Hitler needed to launch his counter-offensive, which resulted in the Battle of the Bulge.

'The Betrayal Of Arnhem' has usually been attributed to a Dutch double or triple agent named Christiaan 'King Kong' Lindemans. Lindemans however was in close contact with Prins Bernhard, and who better to pass high level intelligence on to him than Prins Bernhard zur Lippe Biesterfeld, nazi and SS-er.

After the war, the prince remained active, co-founded the Bilderberg Group, named after the same hotel De Bilderberg in Oosterbeek. He also co-founded the World Wildlife Fund, underlining his love for nature and especially for shooting it.

Bernhard's 'old friend in Argentina' (favorite rabbit hole for nazi war criminals), Jorge Zorreguieta, agriculture minister in the cabinet of Argentina's dictator Videla, supplied Holland's future prinses Maxima. In the process making the Dutch royal family look more like a nazi rat line of German nazis, Spanish fascists and South American dictators.

31 years ago an autobiography appeared by the Dutch communist Wim Klinkenberg, and recent opened archives have proven him right. In fact a war time message has become public, that shows that even during WWII, the cabinet was aware of the Prince's nazi and SS past.

If you're not sick already, you should be.




I have the entire extract from Robert Kershaw's book now - he was the first to take a proper look at post war German accounts and translate them into English - here it is - and it's pretty damning. It Never Snows in September: The German View of Market-Garden and the Battle of Arnhem September 1944:: Amazon.co.uk: Robert Kershaw: Books
Apologies for scanning errors.
http://www.arrse.co.uk/military-history-militaria/93721-17th-september-1944-operation-market-garden-6.html#post4109423

You do have to read right through to the end though to see that the Kampfgruppen that some previous posters have been saying would have stopped the advance of XXX Corps from Driel at 19:00 on 20th Sep simply were not there. By midnight the story was beginning to change as equipment and men were ferried over but the tanks had easily enough time to make it to Arnhem. Shermans do 25mph without much trouble.
It bothers me that Lord Carrington was commanding that lead tank troop.
And got a medal, it seems, for not pulling out the stops to rescue our boys.
Instead of wanting to wait for his own assigned infantry
The 82nd would have gone with him if he was that scared.

If he'd had the courage to go off on his own he would have won the war virtually!

For me this also turns the spotlight of the question onto Horrocks, Adair and Browning.


It Never Snows in September
The German View of MARKET-GARDEN and the battle of Arnhem, September 1944
By Robert Kershaw
Pub: Ian Allan (1994)
By 2200 on 20 September in Oosterhout, immediately north west of the Waal assault boat-crossing site, SS-Captain Schwappacher's remaining 21st Battery and his regimental headquarters were desperately holding a 'hedgehog' outpost against the rising tide of Allied reinforcements. Still holding positions in all-round defence, the battery continued to harass Nijmegen and the dyke road south of Oosterhout with fire. Five houses on the eastern side of the village were set ablaze to compensate for a lack of illumination shells and to prevent surprise attacks. 'At about midnight,' Schwappacher reports, 'a radio message was sent to General von Tettau, that the positions in Oosterhout would be held to the last living man.' After a short fire fight conducted on its southern perimeter, Allied tanks broke into Lent and eliminated the last resistance by remnants of the 1st Company l0SS Engineer Battalion, and the flotsam of reservists and others from the now dispersed Kampfgruppe Henke. Harmel, the commander of the Frundsberg, left Lent dismayed. Despite all his efforts, both bridges were still standing. Allied tanks were now mixed in amongst the fleeing German survivors of the Nijmegen garrison. All appeared lost. Closely monitoring the advance, and seeking solutions to the unsolvable, Harmel noticed that the Allies were 'moving more cautiously, hindered by their own smoke; delays were slowing the advance'.10 He drove on to Bemmel, where the command post of the Kampfgruppe Reinhold - co-ordinating the defence of Nijmegen - was now located, There may yet be a chance to salvage something from this catastrophe. To Schwappacher's relief in Oosterhout, 'the enemy remained quiet all night'. After the war, Harmel was to be more explicit: 'The English drank too much tea. . !', in contrast to the feverish activity that was to characterise German attempts to formulate counter measures that night. Both sides were exhausted. Nevertheless, as Harmel later remarked: The four panzers who crossed the bridge made a mistake when they stayed in Lent. If they had carried on their advance, it would have been allover for US.' Ironically it was nearly allover for another beleaguered garrison defending another bridge 17 kilometres to the north. The Second Battalion the Parachute Regiment, defending the Arnhem bridge, was in its death throes.


pp. 269-275 - CHAPTER XIX - The Missed Opportunity
Why did they not drive on to Elst instead of staying in Lent? At this instant there were no German armoured forces available to block Elst. Heinz Harmel, Commander, 10SS Panzer Division

Plugging the gap. Betuwe, 'the Island' . . .
Karl-Heinz Kracht, the young tank gunner moving with Knaust's armoured column, used a golden opportunity to take photographs as his Mark III panzer, grinding through its gears, began its ascent to the high point of the Arnhem road bridge. His lens began to take objective stock of all around him. Silhouetted against the sky ahead was the majestic span of the bridge's superstructure. To the left and right, burnt-out vehicles had been bulldozed or towed to the side of the road, the debris of Graebner's failed attack. As they passed the rudimentary barrier erected by Frost's men, they observed curious SS soldiers sifting through the tangled wreckage. On the main span the wind, whistling through the girders, brought some of the stench of burning from the battle now raging in the west towards Oosterbeek. Kracht took a shot of the ruined church by the market place, whose towers were now burnt out. With the 50mm tank barrel pointing down the road toward Elden he took another picture of the southern ramp of the bridge. This showed the built-up area where Graebner had formed up and rushed to the high point of the bridge before coming under fire from the north bank. There was no wreckage here. This had 'been a blind spot. Coming towards Kracht's vehicle was a simple horse-drawn cart, carrying refugees back toward the wasted city centre. The focus of German activity appeared now to be moving south towards Nijmegen. Many of these villagers wanted to be spared the horrors that had already engulfed the citizens of Arnhem. In the far distance, separated from the tanks, were marching columns of infantry. Kracht later wrote: 'We were well aware of the significance of the bridge because we had been informed of the pincer movement planned by the British and American forces, and of the attack to the north of the Ruhr area. We crossed the bridge towards Nijmegen on the day when it was evacuated, or a day later. I can't remember exactly.' SS-Colonel Heinz Harmel, the commander of the Frundsberg does remember, and with some alacrity. Knaust's Kampfgruppe, 'reinforced with 8 "Panther" and assault guns, crossed the Arnhem bridge shortly after midday [21 September]; he was ordered by the 1 ass to quickly occupy Elst.' Harmel had spent an anxious night. Knaust's arrival offered a degree of relief to a problem that had appeared for the moment insoluble. Harmel wondered, even after the war, why the tanks that had rushed the Nijmegen bridge with such elan had not continued further. The Allies had certainly missed an opportunity. They might possibly have pushed a battle group into Arnhem itself. 'Why did they not drive on to Elst instead of staying in Lent?' he asked; 'at this instant there were no German armoured forces available to block Elst.'3 It was a lost chance: 'It gave us time to get Knaust down there. It was ironic really, at the same time we lost the Nijmegen bridge, we were just about over the Arnhem bridge. The Allied infantry were too late supporting their tanks.'4 The capitulation of the bridges, so hard fought and costly, was to prove a hollow victory for both sides. Frost's obstinate resistance was instrumental in forcing IISS Corps to depend upon the Pannerden ferry to get its reinforcements to the Waal. In the event the l0SS were unable to reinforce sufficiently quickly to reverse the outcome at Nijmegen. Likewise, the Allies were unable to capitalise on their seizure of the Waal bridges. Crucial in tipping the scales for both engagements was the ferrying operation conducted by the Frundsberg at Pannerden. SS¬ Captain Brandt, the l0SS Engineer Battalion Commander, achieved much in difficult circumstances. Badly battered in Normandy, his force was weak in both manpower and equipment. After sending his only motorised ad hoc company to Nijmegen under SS-2/Lieutenant Baumgaertel to assist in its defence, he was left with a hastily reorganised company under SS-Lieutenant Munski to assist around Pannerden. Brandt recalls that 'much work had to be done at the ferry sites as we only had map references indicating the location of existing sites'.5 Throughout the operation he remembers they were harassed by Allied 'Jabo' attacks and artillery fire. Utilising rafts and commandeered motor boats the ferrying operation painstakingly transported units that had by¬passed Arnhem across the lower Rhine and canal. By the evening of 18 September Baumgaertel's engineers and the Kampfgruppe Reinhold had crossed. During the night the depleted l0SS Panzer Regiment was ferried over, so that by 19 September four assault guns had reached Nijmegen, and a further 16 Mark IV panzers and SPs were available for operations on the north bank of the Waal. The process continued during daylight hours when the Kampfgruppe 'Hartung' – a Wehrmacht reservist battalion - and one and a half battalions from the SS-Panzer-grenadier Regiment 22, also got across. Included among these were both forward command posts of the l0SS and IISS Corps. Progress was slow, marred by inadequate transport and repeated air attacks. Units after assembly were faced with a 15-kilometre march to Nijmegen, much of it across exposed dyke roads. Consequently, few were available for effective operations until late on 20 September. When the Nijmegen bridge was captured, the one and a half battalions of Panzer-grenadier Regiment 22 and the tanks were either in the process of re-forming after the river crossing, or still laboriously on the move in well¬dispersed formations to avoid attracting air attacks. The only forces on the 'Island', or Betuwe, able to oppose a breakthrough were the survivors of Graebner's Reconnaissance Battalion 9. This decimated group was deployed with one weak company on picket duty on the southern bank of the lower Rhine, opposite Arnhem's western suburbs and the bridge, and the remnants of another in Elst. As the first Sherman tanks, scattering escapees from the Nijmegen garrison, surged into Lent, the road ahead was open. All that stood in the way of XXX Corps and Arnhem during much of the night of 20-21 September were a few security pickets.

Improvisation. . .
Arriving at Reinhold's command post in Bemmel during the evening of 20 September, Harmel frantically tried to retrieve the situation. Those parts of Panzer-grenadier Regiment 22 and the tanks that had already crossed the ferry were ordered to counter¬attack immediately from the east. But these elements of the reconstituted Karnpfgruppe Reinhold lacked heavy weapons. Only one light battery of field howitzers had been brought across the ferry so far, and they were positioned east of Flieren. The counter¬attack, therefore, lacked punch. By darkness a rudimentary line had been established one kilometre north of Lent, and this gradually thickened into linked outposts as more units, including the Kampfgruppe 'Hartung', became available to Reinhold. By first light German blocking positions occupied the crossroads one kilometre south-west of Ressen, south of the village itself and south of Bemmel down to the Waal river. Bittrich, the IISS Corps Commander, instructed Harmel to counter-attack at first light on 21 September to forestall and spoil the anticipated Allied thrust on Elst, and thence to Arnhem. 'All the forces available from Pannerden,' ordered the General, 'are to be collected and attack the eastern flank of the enemy vanguards, overwhelm them, and throw the enemy back over the Waal river.'7 SS-Captain Schwappacher's 21 Artillery Battery, his regimental headquarters, and other collected units, were still holding on to the 'hedgehog' position around Oosterhout. Apart from imposing a degree of caution upon any projected Allied thrust to Arnhem, they provided an anchor to the right of the thin screen raised by the Kampfgruppe Reinhold to cover the approach to Arnhem. Early on 21 September, Knaust arrived for a preliminary reconnaissance and was briefed on the Oosterhout situation by Schwappacher. New battery positions were established south of Elst. Many of Schwappacher's personnel, gun crews and radio operators, currently manning trenches as infantry, were needed there. At 1200 the SS Artillery and Training Regiment V finally thinned out as more of Knaust's Kampfgruppe arrived. Flight was still in the minds of the soldiers. Schwappacher mentions three Wehrmacht batteries originally located north-east of Oosterhout which, 'despite appeals from me to hold their positions during the critical situation the day before, had already withdrawn their positions further back to the north-west'. The atmosphere of unease and alarm prevailing since the bridges' loss remained. Harmel's punch against the eastern flank of the breakthrough was eventually assembled and mounted. Thinly spread over a four kilometre front, a force of about three battalions, divided into three to four Kampfgruppen, supported by 16 Mark IV tanks, advanced westwards. Artillery resources were sparse: a light battery east of Flieren, and two more from the l0SS Artillery Regiment firing from the east bank of the Pannerden canal. These were desperate measures. SS Panzer-grenadier Regiment 21's one and a half battalions could not be included, because they were delayed by the ferry crossing, and had only got as far as Haalderen, one and a half kilometres west of Bemmel. It was all that could be scraped together in the time allowed by General Bittrich. Even ferrying operations were interrupted to assist in the attack, SS-Captain Brandt at Pannerden recalls: Ja - and then there was a breakthrough somewhere, and we were taken out. Even during actual loading operations I had to take part in the defence of a wooded area with my headquarters company, and any other soldiers that could be found around, supported also by six tanks.'8 These scant resources were flung against an ever-growing enemy lodgement. This, with the impact of Allied artillery, conspired to water down the decisive blow that Bittrich sought. His appreciation was, as ever, correct, but his means simply did not match the task. All that was achieved was a westward adjustment of the line, which did have the effect of imposing a cautionary check on any thoughts of an Allied dash to Arnhem. It is quite possible that the Allies might have been able to feed a battle group into Arnhem, before the road was finally blocked again. During the first night of 20-21 September there were only security pickets reinforced by one or two outposts in position. This situation continued until Knaust finally arrived in force during the afternoon of the 21st. For five hours between 1900 and midnight on the 20th the road was clear. Nothing of substance could close it effectively until Knaust began to drive south after midday on the 21st. It was truly a missed opportunity. Frost's forces were overwhelmed just as the window of opportunity closed again. By 1600 Knaust's Kampfgruppe had reached Elst. He proceeded to block the road effectively with the armoured forces at his disposal. Liaison was established with the advancing flanking movement from the east. By the evening of 21 September the German line ran from the southern edge of Elst, held by the Kampfgruppe Knaust, via Aam north of Ressen, fortified by Hartung's reservists. It continued over the western edge of Bemmel, defended by the few tanks of the l0SS Panzer Regiment, then south to the Waal, manned by Panzer-grenadier 22. A firm line was at last at last emerging, able to block or, in the worst case, threaten any further Allied advance northwards to Arnhem. It was an amazing achievement. Harmel summed up the driving factor: 'It was astounding to see what could be achieved by improvisation.'9 Allied superiority on the 'Island' meant very little in these low¬-lying polder marshes, criss-crossed with water-filled ditches and waterways. Cover was also sparse. There were only a few orchards and the villages. Harmel was able to exploit his few tanks covering the exposed and slightly raised dyke roads that traversed this terrain. 'This had an impact,' he remembers; 'the terrain between Nijmegen and Arnhem was the worst possible for tanks - for both sides.' 'Improvisation' for the German soldier meant march and counter-march in an atmosphere of emergency and alarm. Soldiers in the line appeared aware only of the basic situation: there were British paratroopers in Arnhem, and Americans coming up through Nijmegen trying to link up with them. Enemy airborne soldiers in the rear always unsettled the veterans. Their recollections of this period are confused and uncertain; a few village names can be remembered, but little else other than the frantic nature of the activity characterising these operations. A breakthrough somewhere else always meant yet another town or village to be by-passed in order to reach their objective, often by night and with little or no warning. Scant knowledge of the overall situation generated unease. Kampfgruppe Reinhold's reconstituted units achieved little more than an advance in column, until they were ordered to consolidate and dig in on the line they had reached. Few units, apart from the tanks and grenadiers providing the vanguards, even made contact with the enemy. Allied artillery tended to dictate the speed and extent of progress. It Never Snows in September: The German View of Market-Garden and the Battle of Arnhem September 1944:: Amazon.co.uk: Robert Kershaw: Books
--
+44 (0)7786 952037
http://groups.google.com/group/uk-911-truth
http://www.youtube.com/user/PublicEnquiry
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Diggers350/
http://www.reinvestigate911.org/
http://www.thisweek.org.uk/
http://www.911forum.org.uk/
"Capitalism is institutionalised bribery."
_________________
www.abolishwar.org.uk
<http://www.elementary.org.uk>www.elementary.org.uk
www.public-interest.co.uk
www.radio4all.net/index.php/series/Bristol+Broadband+Co-operative
www.facebook.com/media/set/?set=a.1407615751783.2051663.1274106225&l=90330c0ba5&type=1
<http://utangente.free.fr/2003/media2003.pdf>http://utangente.free.fr/2003/media2003.pdf "The maintenance of secrets acts like a psychic poison which alienates the possessor from the community" Carl Jung
<https://217.72.179.7/members/www.bilderberg.org/phpBB2/>https://217.72.179.7/members/www.bilderberg.org/phpBB2/

Fear not therefore: for there is nothing covered that shall not be revealed; and nothing hid that shall not be made known. What I tell you in darkness, that speak ye in the light and what ye hear in the ear, that preach ye upon the housetops. Matthew 10:26-27

Die Pride and Envie; Flesh, take the poor's advice.
Covetousnesse be gon: Come, Truth and Love arise.
Patience take the Crown; throw Anger out of dores:
Cast out Hypocrisie and Lust, which follows whores:
Then England sit in rest; Thy sorrows will have end;
Thy Sons will live in peace, and each will be a friend.
http://tinyurl.com/6ct7zh6
--
Please consider seriously the reason why these elite institutions are not discussed in the mainstream press despite the immense financial and political power they wield? There are sick and evil occultists running the Western World. They are power mad lunatics like something from a kids cartoon with their fingers on the nuclear button! Armageddon is closer than you thought. Only God can save our souls from their clutches, at least that's my considered opinion - Tony

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"PEPIS" group. Please feel free to forward it to anyone who might be interested 
particularly your political representatives, journalists and spiritual leaders/dudes.

To post to this group, send email to [email protected]

To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pepis?hl=en

Reply via email to