More on this year's Bilderberg where Clarke was UK steering group rep.
Kissinger & Bilderberg global neo-Nazi protection racket
Tony Gosling rounds up after Bilderberg 2012,
interviewed by Rick Wiles from Trunews.com (40mins)
http://www.radio4all.net/index.php/program/60581
http://www.911forum.org.uk/board/viewtopic.php?p=161241#161241
Bilderberg 2012 - Secret Rulers of the West (30mins)
http://www.radio4all.net/index.php/program/60584
Climbdown over secret courts? Nonsense. Now it's
even worse: How Ken Clarke's masterclass in spin
hid REAL story about new justice laws
By David Rose – Daily Mail - 3 June 2012
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2153754/Climbdown-secret-courts-Nonsense-Now-worse-How-Ken-Clarkes-masterclass-spin-hid-REAL-story-new-justice-laws.html
Justice Secretary Ken Clarke briefed reporters
that his plans to allow courts to sit in secret had 'gone too far'
It looked like a Government U-turn last Monday
when Justice Secretary Ken Clarke briefed
reporters that his plans to allow courts to sit
in secret had ‘gone too far’ and promised, as one
front-page headline put it, they would be ‘rowed back’.
That was the spin. But the following morning,
when Mr Clarke’s Ministry published the text of
his Justice and Security Bill, the truth became clear.
In reality, the Government had made just one
important concession: dropping its original
intention that the new secret hearings would extend to inquests.
But, in every other respect, the Bill is
draconian and will, if passed, introduce levels
of secrecy quite without precedent.
Despite Mr Clarke’s soothing reassurances, this
is the truth about the supposed ‘climbdown’:
- Ministers will be able to demand secret
hearings in any civil court case where they claim
airing evidence openly might ‘damage the interests of national security’.
- Theoretically, judges could reject such
demands. But the Bill makes clear that in
practice their role will be that of rubber stamps.
- In some types of case, Ministers will be able
to shut down an action altogether if it has
anything to do with an intelligence service, or
if the Government claims it might damage ‘international relations’.
Senior Tory backbencher David Davis, a fierce
opponent of the plans, said yesterday: ‘The way
this was managed is typical of the Blair years.
They chose a week when Parliament wasn’t sitting
and successfully pre-spun the Bill with the media before it was even published.
‘Only when it was issued did it become apparent
that it is still a corrosive attack on centuries
of legal tradition and the rules of natural
justice, with their basic principle that people
must have the right to know what is alleged against them.’
So restrictive are the Bill’s proposals that one
young woman whose family was ‘rendered’ to Libya
has sent a letter – printed on this page – to Mr Clarke.
In it, she describes her horror when, aged 12,
MI6 played a direct role in spiriting away her
family in the night on a secret flight from China to detention in Libya.
Now she wants to know why the British Government
is still trying to suppress the truth in court.
The main argument Mr Clarke used to justify the
Bill also needs close scrutiny.
The turning point, he claimed in a newspaper
article, came in 2010, with the payment of
millions of pounds in damages to 12 men – all UK
residents or citizens – who had been prisoners at
Guantanamo Bay and were suing the Government for
Britain’s alleged collusion in their torture and ill-treatment.
‘There is understandable public outrage when the
Government is forced to spend significant sums
settling cases which it believes it can win,’ he wrote.
If only he had been able to order a secret
hearing, he suggested, the courts could have
heard the full case against the men, and the damages would not have been paid.
But could the Government really have won the
Guantanamo damages action, under any circumstances?
All of the men had already been cleared for
release by US tribunals at Guantanamo, which
heard every scrap of evidence against them –
including the confessions of others obtained by torture.
Where on earth was Mr Clarke going to find a
fresh ‘smoking gun’? Take Bisher al-Rawi. I spoke
to him last week, more than five years after he
first told his story in The Mail on Sunday on his release from Guantanamo.
Mr al-Rawi spent months in 2002 working closely
with handlers from MI5 in an eventually
successful effort to find the radical preacher
Abu Qatada, who was then on the run – only to
find himself betrayed by the very agency he had helped.
As only emerged much later, they sent a message
to the Americans recommending he be abducted when
he went on a business trip to the Gambia.
Detained and interrogated there on the grounds he
was planning to set up a terrorist training camp
in an African country he had not visited, he then
spent five years in Guantanamo. And the critical
evidence against him? His ‘association’ with Abu
Qatada, whom he had only contacted at the behest of MI5.
Now married with two children, Mr al-Rawi has
spent the period since his release rebuilding his
life. ‘I try not to remember the pain of it. Some
of it has gone, but not all,’ he said.
But one thing he is happy to remember vividly is
the ‘mediation’ meeting which led to the damages
settlement between the 12 former prisoners, their
lawyers, and those representing the Government.
A girl who was abducted with her family and sent
by MI6 on an ‘extraordinary rendition’ torture
flight to Colonel Gaddafi’s Libya has made a
personal plea to Justice Secretary Ken Clarke,
urging him not to protect those responsible via
the new Justice and Security Bill.
As The Mail on Sunday revealed last year,
Khadeeja al-Saadi was just 12 when she was
abducted in Hong Kong in 2004 with her mother,
three siblings and her father Sami, a leading opponent of the Gaddafi regime.
All were detained, and her father suffered
years of torture and was sentenced to death
before finally being freed when the regime was
toppled last year. The family, who had lived in
London for many years, are now suing the British Government.
Documents found in Libya confirm that their
rendition was only possible because MI6 lured
them to Hong Kong on the pretext of an interview at the British Embassy.
Instead, they were seized by CIA agents at the
airport and handed over to the brutal Libyan security service.
The Bill, published last week, would give the
Government sweeping powers to ensure that any
evidence about the role of the intelligence and
security services is heard in secret.
In an attempt to change Mr Clarke’s mind,
Khadeeja has written this letter, which his office confirmed he has received.
He said: ‘The Government team never gave any hint
that they wished they could have been presenting
some kind of secret defence. You could see they
had no confidence they could win if it went to
trial. Had they really thought they could, things
would not have progressed as they did.’
His lawyers, led by solicitor Gareth Peirce, make
a further point. When the Government – just a few
months into the action – began to try to settle
it, they had already disclosed about 1,000
documents. Of these, not one cast any doubt on
the former prisoners’ case; in fact, each disclosure only strengthened it.
Mr al-Rawi said he didn’t mind that the full
details of his case, and thus the identities of
those to blame for his plight, had not come into
the open: in some ways, not having to revisit his
suffering had made life easier.
However, when documents were published by this
newspaper showing that in 2004 MI6 also connived
with Colonel Gaddafi’s intelligence service to
‘render’ his political opponents for torture in
Libya, and the opponents in turn decided to sue
the Government, he became excited.
‘I thought: here at last is just one story which
will be fully told. Let’s find out what the heck
was really happening: who was responsible, who was making the decisions.’
Instead, if the Bill becomes law, the cases
brought by the Libyan victims of rendition will
either be held in secret, or stop dead in their tracks.
Yesterday former Director of Public Prosecutions
Lord Macdonald said: ‘The improvements do not go nearly far enough.
‘The Bill means that for the security services,
no matter how strong the evidence of wrongdoing,
it will be suppressed. That is bad for them, and bad for the rule of law.’
How distant David Cameron’s promises on taking
office two years ago now seem. Allegations that
UK services had been involved in torture had
‘overshadowed’ their reputation, he said then,
and it was time ‘to clear up this matter once and for all’.
Foreign Secretary William Hague added that
Britain’s involvement in torture meant the
country was not as effective as it should be ‘in
dealing with a world marred by tyranny, oppression and injustice’.
Then, their solution was a public inquiry. That
was cancelled months ago, when the MI6 Libya
rendition documents were discovered.
Now, with Mr Clarke’s Bill, the last available
means of letting in the daylight is about to be shut down.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2153754/Climbdown-secret-courts-Nonsense-Now-worse-How-Ken-Clarkes-masterclass-spin-hid-REAL-story-new-justice-laws.html?ito=feeds-newsxml
--
+44 (0)7786 952037
http://groups.google.com/group/uk-911-truth
http://www.youtube.com/user/PublicEnquiry
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Diggers350/
http://www.reinvestigate911.org/
http://www.thisweek.org.uk/
http://www.911forum.org.uk/
"Capitalism is institutionalised bribery."
_________________
www.abolishwar.org.uk
www.globalresearch.ca
www.public-interest.co.uk
www.radio4all.net/index.php/series/Bristol+Broadband+Co-operative
www.facebook.com/media/set/?set=a.1407615751783.2051663.1274106225&l=90330c0ba5&type=1
<http://utangente.free.fr/2003/media2003.pdf>http://utangente.free.fr/2003/media2003.pdf
"The maintenance of secrets acts like a psychic
poison which alienates the possessor from the community" Carl Jung
<https://217.72.179.7/members/www.bilderberg.org/phpBB2/>https://217.72.179.7/members/www.bilderberg.org/phpBB2/
Fear not therefore: for there is nothing covered
that shall not be revealed; and nothing hid that
shall not be made known. What I tell you in
darkness, that speak ye in the light and what ye
hear in the ear, that preach ye upon the housetops. Matthew 10:26-27
Die Pride and Envie; Flesh, take the poor's advice.
Covetousnesse be gon: Come, Truth and Love arise.
Patience take the Crown; throw Anger out of dores:
Cast out Hypocrisie and Lust, which follows whores:
Then England sit in rest; Thy sorrows will have end;
Thy Sons will live in peace, and each will be a friend.
http://tinyurl.com/6ct7zh6
--
Please consider seriously the reason why these elite institutions are not discussed in the mainstream press despite the immense financial and political power they wield?
There are sick and evil occultists running the Western World. They are power mad lunatics like something from a kids cartoon with their fingers on the nuclear button! Armageddon is closer than you thought. Only God can save our souls from their clutches, at least that's my considered opinion - Tony
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"PEPIS" group. Please feel free to forward it to anyone who might be interested
particularly your political representatives, journalists and spiritual leaders/dudes.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pepis?hl=en
