Here's an excerpt from the Paul Manning book:
Martin Bormann, Nazi in Exile which includes a
glimpse of the Dark side of the Wallenberg family
both during and after the war
http://spitfirelist.com/books/martin-bormann-nazi-in-exile/
http://www.911forum.org.uk/board/viewtopic.php?p=162176#162176
#
Martin Bormann also knew that the vast funds sent
outside the Third Reich under his new Nazi state
policy were rapidly concealed in safe havens. In
Sweden, the technique was to use Swedish cloaks
or German-controlled local nationals to increase
the recapitalization of Swedish firms. This
produced a further stock buy-in by German
interests. A big penetration was made into
commercial and mercantile enterprises, where
nearly two hundred Swedish firms were now
operating on capital wholly or in part supplied by Germans or German firms.
In 1944 there was intense pressure on Sweden by
American and British government representatives
to halt the export of iron ore, special steels,
and machine tools to Germany. The Allies also
wanted to deny the Germans Swedish ball bearings,
a prime element in all machinery of war used by
the Wehrmacht and Luftwaffe. They also wanted
German military traffic through Sweden to Norway
stopped. An interesting sidelight to this
struggle between the Allies and Germany for
influence on Sweden is the peculiar role played
by Marcus and Jacob Wallenburg, members of
Sweden’s most important banking family. Marcus
headed a government commission which negotiated
trade and political agreements with Britain and
the United States throughout the war. At the same
time, his brother Jacob was chief trade and
economic negotiator for the Swedish government
with Nazi Germany. Thus were both sides covered
for Swedish business, including the family’s own
very substantial economic interests. Following
World War II, this family empire was to achieve
its most spectacular prosperity, as German
investments under the Martin Bormann program
matured in their Swedish safe-havens. In this way
impressive wealth accrued to the Wallenburgs as
well as to other Swedish and German investment
groups controlling large holdings in the many
Swedish companies under German dominance in 1944.
For a time, however, in 1944 under the pressure
of threatening to place Sweden on an Allied
blacklist, coupled with promises of compensating
Allied orders, Sweden agreed to Allied demands in
December 1944, the very week Martin Bormann was
reviewing German investments in Sweden. He
shrugged at the news clattering over the teletype
from Berlin. The agreement pleased the Allies but
failed to dent the Bormann-sponsored hidden
investment program in Sweden. The war would be
over anyway in a matter of months, and business
would pick up again. The binding ties of
marriage, finance, and investment between Sweden
and Germany were stronger than ever, and with
peace would come a lessening of Allied probing
into German financial and business manipulations,
particularly when so many Swedes had a personal
stake in the growth and prosperity of every firm
owned or controlled by German interests. The
Allies were advancing everywhere on the
battlefronts and in their diplomatic arm-twisting
of neutral nations. Yet the outlook of
Reichsleiter Bormann differed little from the
pragmatic cynicism of Hermann Röchling, the Saar
steel magnate, who, when told in December 1944
that the Saarland would be overrun in days by
American forces, replied almost indifferently:
“We have lost the Saar once before and won it
back. Old as I am, I shall see it return to our
possession again.” And so it did.
The movement of German assets into Switzerland
had also gone well, Bormann noted from his
reports. Flight capital investments had been
accomplished principally through the
establishment of subsidiaries of powerful German
firms. Over half the total German capital in
Switzerland was used in setting up holding
companies representing I.G. Farben, Merck,
Siemens, Osram, Henkel, and others. A holding
company may not trade in any form. It may only
hold stock in other companies, but through this
device the existing German firms, and the 750 new
corporations established under the Bormann
program, gave themselves absolute control over a
postwar economic network of viable, prosperous
companies that stretched from the Ruhr to the
“neutrals” of Europe and to the countries of
South America; a control that continues today and
is easily maintained through the bearer bonds or
shares issued by these corporations to cloak real
ownership. Bearer shares require no registration
of identity, for such shares are exactly what
they mean; the bearer of the majority shares
controls the company without needing a vestige of
proof as to how he acquired them. Thus the
Germans who participated as a silent force in
Bormann’s postwar commercial campaign-which is
sometimes referred to by aging Nazis as
“Operation Eagle’s Flight” or “Aktion
Adlerflug”—insured their command over the
industrial and financial institutions that were
to move the new Federal Republic of Germany back
into the forefront of world economic leadership................
A national of each country was the nominal head
of each corporate structure and the board was a
mix of German administrators and bank officials,
while the staffing at senior and middle
management levels was comprised of German
scientists and technicians. In the background
were the shadowy owners of the corporation, those
Germans who possessed the bearer bonds as proof
of stock ownership. The establishment of such
companies, usually launched in industries
requiring high technical skills, was welcomed in
Spain and Argentina, to give two examples,
because those governments appreciated that German
companies would generate jobs and implement a
more favorable balance of trade. Country by
country, a breakdown by U.S. Treasury
investigators of these new 750 German firms was
as follows: Portugal, 58; Spain, 112; Sweden,
233; Switzerland, 214; Turkey, 35; Argentina, 98.
If you've been funded by the Martin Bormann Nazi
financial network what's the best thing to do?
Public Relations advisers say: Big-up your brother!
If neocon team member Aaronovitch paints Sweden
as stainless blah blah, I’m sure you will mention
how they have helped the CIA break the Geneva
Convention (I don’t use the word ‘rendition’).
But another point you can make is that he can’t
be serious, given that, as all Swedes know,
Sweden is owned by one family, the Wallenbergs.
If you weren’t previously aware of that fact, and
are sceptical, I suggest checking it with Swedes of your acquaintance.
Do any of us really believe that another power,
with its embassy not in Knightsbridge but in
Mayfair, on Grosvenor Square, isn’t involved in
this obscene centralised effort in the British media?
Party differences, and supposed political
differences between newspapers, seem to have disappeared.
.......
If the Wallenbergs are offered as a “they own the
government” theory, then additionally a cynical
opponent like Aaronovitch will claim your real
theory is “Jewish wealth”, regardless of its
veracity. That becomes a further trap to get out of.
Anyway, I found this article on the topic; their
WWII history is very interesting, as are the comments.
http://www.craigmurray.org.uk/archives/2012/08/murray-vs-aaronovitch-o
n-assange/
Raoul Wallenberg – Sweden's Not-So-Favourite Son
http://www.thelocal.se/38292/20120102/
Published: 2 Jan 12 15:23 CET | Double click on a word to get a translation
The Swedish government has announced that it will
designate 2012 as the official "Raoul Wallenberg
Year" and the honour is more than deserved.
'Give Wallenberg an annual day': minister (4 Aug 12)
The Raoul Wallenberg Calendar: Q&A with Brian Palmer (4 Aug 12)
'One individual can save the lives of thousands' (4 Aug 12)
Planned events will highlight the remarkable
courage the Swedish businessman showed when in
July 1944, at age thirty-one, he accepted a
diplomatic appointment to go to Budapest, Hungary
to confront the ruthless Nazi death machinery.
By the time of Wallenberg's arrival it had
swallowed up five-hundred thousand Jews of the
Hungarian countryside and the less than
two-hundred thousand left in the capital were about to meet the same fate.
Driven by the young Swede's relentless energy, a
wide network of diplomatic colleagues and other
helpers managed to save thousands of Budapest's Jews.
Already by the end of the war Wallenberg's
reputation had achieved legendary status.
However, in January 1945 the rescuer himself
became a victim when he disappeared as a prisoner in Stalin's GULAG.
Largely abandoned to his fate by his home
country, the disgraceful lack of efforts on his
behalf prompted a public apology to Wallenberg's
family by then Swedish Prime Minister Göran Persson in 2001.
Sweden's relationship with what should be its
favourite son has always been a complicated one.
For his countrymen, he has often proved to be a
problematic hero; someone who is admired, but not universally loved.
While Wallenberg's reputation has steadily grown
abroad - he is an honorary citizen of the U.S.,
Canada and Israel - Sweden did not dedicate an
official memorial in his honour until 1997. Not
surprisingly, the 2012 commemoration is again
geared largely towards a foreign audience.
"The official Raoul Wallenberg year serves
primarily to use him to advertise Sweden abroad
as a morally outstanding country," says art
historian Tanja Schult who has studied Wallenberg as a cultural symbol.
"But it obscures the fact that the very qualities
Wallenberg represents - independent, conscience
driven action - stood in contrast to official
Sweden's treatment of the European Jews, at least
until 1942/43, and have been a major source of conflict with his own country."
A special exhibit highlighting Wallenberg's
accomplishments in Budapest was previewed for
only one day in Sweden, on December 20, before
leaving on an international tour.
Wallenberg's message as someone who confronted
hate, anti-Semitism and genocide should also hold
special meaning for his home country where a
recent survey found that 26 per cent of young
adults between the ages of 18-29 would not mind living in a dictatorship.
By focusing the centennial almost exclusively on
Wallenberg as a symbol of tolerance many
researchers also worry that Sweden is once again
sidestepping the complex and controversial
questions that remain in connection with Wallenberg's fate.
This begs the question: Why can Sweden not do
both? Honour his remarkable legacy and at the
same time seize this golden opportunity to
finally determine the full truth about his
disappearance after being arrested by Soviet forces on January 17th, 1945?
Sweden's complex attitude toward Raoul Wallenberg
is very much rooted in the country's conformist culture.
Right from the beginning, his life did not fit
into the clear social parameters Swedes prefer.
He was born a Wallenberg but was raised outside
the influential banking family. He was an
architect by training but worked as a businessman.
He was not a real diplomat, nor a real spy and
for many years after he went missing he was
considered neither truly dead nor confirmed to be alive.
Most importantly, like any visionary, he was not
afraid to test boundaries and to break the rules while working in Budapest.
Still, the question remains why Swedish officials
showed so little sympathy for Raoul Wallenberg after he disappeared.
The political sensitivities and uncertainties
that characterized Wallenberg's mission (the U.S.
government had originated and financed a large
part of the project) as well as the chaotic
conditions of the immediate post-war period alone
cannot account for Sweden's extreme passivity.
One reason was clearly that as an official
Swedish representative in Hungary Wallenberg had
been wildly successful, yet in many ways this
success carried the flair of an individualistic
achievement. It did not altogether constitute a triumph of Swedish diplomacy.
In fact, many in the Swedish Foreign Office felt
that both Wallenberg's methods and behaviour were
highly "un-diplomatic", in the true sense of the
word, and that through his unbridled enthusiasm
he had created a crisis for himself and for them
that they resented having to solve.
Swedish officials like to point to Wallenberg as
an example of a diplomat who showed both unusual
compassion and the courage to act, but they are
less ready to acknowledge that Wallenberg's
success highlights a fundamental contradiction.
While his official diplomatic status undoubtedly
enabled Wallenberg to be effective, his
correspondence also shows how much he chafed at
the many bureaucratic strictures imposed on him.
Where the Swedish government was cautious not to
push German and Hungarian Nazi authorities too
hard, Wallenberg was constantly trying to find
ways to maximize rescue efforts.
From the very beginning Wallenberg made it clear
he did not simply want to protect only those
individuals with close business or family ties to
Sweden, but he also intended to use the system he
and his colleagues were putting in place to save as many people as possible.
"In my opinion, the help project should continue
on the highest scale," Wallenberg wrote in late July 1944.
To accomplish this, in August 1944 he sharply
urged the Swedish Foreign Office "to sacrifice
the sacred institution of the provisional
passport and to grant [us] the full right to hand them out."
His request was not met, forcing him to rely on
an alternate document, the by now famous "Schutzpass" (Protective Passport).
That his mission did not enjoy unanimous support
at home found expression in the prescient warning
issued by his friend and business partner Kalman
Lauer, writing from Stockholm:
"Gratitude for your work you can probably not
expect .... So be very careful before you throw yourself into any adventures."
Lauer realized that by confronting the enemy
outside - Nazism -, Wallenberg would sooner or
later also have to face obstacles within his own country.
In other words, what made him a hero in the
world's eyes, showed up the serious weaknesses at
home, something that many Swedish officials did not exactly welcome.
Former Under Secretary of State, Leif Leifland,
who headed the Wallenberg investigation in the
1970's and early 1980's, suggests that one reason
why Wallenberg has not been embraced in Sweden is
that quite a few members of the diplomatic establishment resented his success.
"Frankly," Leifland says, "Raoul Wallenberg was not very popular."
One reason was the deeply ingrained German
sympathies of the wartime Foreign Office. Another
reason was that Wallenberg overshadowed the
reputation of all other Swedish diplomats after the war.
"Everywhere they went, no matter what they did,
the talk was always about Wallenberg - not about
the clever and important things they did," Leifland says.
"For many, this was hard to swallow."
Sweden's former Ambassador to Hungary, Jan
Lundvik, put it even more bluntly in an interview
with the Wall Street Journal in 2009.
"They did not want him back," Lundvik told the paper.
It is therefore good to see that the Swedish
government will finally show Wallenberg its long-overdue appreciation.
But why omit an important part of Raoul
Wallenberg's personal story, as a victim of
totalitarianism during the Cold War, and why not
demand that justice is finally done, as a matter of principle?
Especially now, when new information has emerged
that suggests the case can indeed be solved and
that has finally proved wrong the long held
official Russian claim that Wallenberg died on
July 17, 1947 of a heart attack in a Moscow prison.
The currently available evidence leaves open the
possibility that he lived after July 1947 for
weeks, months or even years in Soviet captivity.
Why does Swedish Foreign Minister Carl Bildt, the
official chairman of the Raoul Wallenberg
Centennial, not firmly insist on full information
from Russia's leaders who lied to an official
Working Group as late as 2001 instead of meekly
asking them yet once again for "an open archival policy"?
If anything, Sweden's limited approach serves as
a reminder that while Swedish officials may like
to invoke Wallenberg's spirit, they are still a long way from matching it.
Susanne Berger
Susanne Berger is a US-based German historian
heavily involved in research into the life of
Raoul Wallenberg, the Swedish diplomat who helped
prevent the arrests of thousands of Hungarian
Jews during the Second World War.
COMMENTS
16:22 January 2, 2012 by rufus.t.firefly
It's pretty clear that Raoul Wallenberg is
cynically used "to advertise Sweden as a morally
outstanding country." The lack of any serious
effort find out what really happened or to be
more truthful about the Swedish government's
behavior, both then and now, is telling.
He can't really even serve as a symbol of
courageous moral action in a political culture
where, even today, actions like his are not particularly admired.
I'd like to know more about who did what, to the
extent it is possible, and see real public discourse. I'm dreaming.
Report abuse »
#2
20:30 January 2, 2012 by guliver
Raul Wallenberg is one of the angels who risked
and gave their lives to save the Jews during the Holocaust,
I think that we the Jewish people in Israel and
abroad have not done enough to discover what
happened to him ,he should have been brought to
his last way as an Hero,every one here has
studied about him and his courageous acts during
the 2ww specialy in saving the life of the Jews in Budapest,
May God bless his name for ever!
Israel
Report abuse »
#3
04:38 January 3, 2012 by Rökdal
Valdemar and Nina Langlet never was given enough
credits for their work in Budapest either. http://www.vortaro.hu/langlet.htm
Report abuse »
#4
08:45 January 3, 2012 by Kevin Harris
The greatest tragedy about the mysterious and
horrible death of Wallenberg is that so many
people spend so much time speculating about it,
they become distracted from his glorious life. He
was the greatest Swede ever, a "moral giant", he
well deserves his celebratory year. But he well
deserves to be celebrated every other year too.
Successive Swedish governments have found
Wallenberg to be a bit of an embarrassment,
particularly the Social Democrats, who struggle
with his aristocracy, and their political
sympathy for his murderers. Well done the
Moderates for making a start at putting that right.
Report abuse »
#5
10:49 January 3, 2012 by Lavaux
This is without reservation the best article I've
ever read on the Local. Keep up the good work!
A few comments. First, Sweden's foreign policy
for the past 100 years has been to ensure that
Sweden profits from conflict by supplying all
combatants with Swedish commodities and
manufactured goods while officially denouncing
their belligerence and calling for peace. This
foreign policy engenders obvious contradictions
with Sweden's self-appointed role as humanity's
conscience, which is why the Foreign Ministry
despised Wallenberg, who had the unforgivable
temerity to demand that they actually help him
save lives. For the Swedish approach to work, the
ideological must never confront the real, yet
here was Wallenberg demanding that it must,
thereby undermining the Swedish brand as humanity's moral role model.
Second, an individual Swede must never stand
against or contradict his team, particularly when
they are wrong and he is right. The fiction of
Sweden's moral superiority relies on the
cooperation of every individual member of the
Foreign Ministry in suppressing every instance of
the inhumanity and corruption rotting at its
core, and any diplomat who steps out of line must
be crushed. Wallenberg stepped out of line, so he
was crushed. Better he rot in a Soviet gulag than
tell a gaggle of journalists how he fought
against the Foreign Ministry to save Jews.
Third, although Sweden played both sides of the
Cold War from its inception just as it did during
WWII, its elites' true sympathies lay with the
communists. Knowing this, the Soviets exploited
the Swedish Foreign Ministry as useful idiots
willing to trumpet Soviet propaganda against NATO
and the United States, slathered in the varnish
of Sweden's fictional moral superiority. One can
only wonder what boons the Swedish Foreign
Ministry was able to extract from the Soviets in
return for their cooperation beyond the
imprisonment and murder of Wallenberg. I'd love
to know, but I doubt they'll ever come to light.
Report abuse »
#6
13:14 January 3, 2012 by motti
@Lavaux,
Excellent synopsis and I agree with what you have
stated except one tiny piece. Sweden would never
supply Israel with arms to defend itself.
I am not sure what tiny Israel could have done
about this wonderful man. Certainly, neither the
mighty Soviet Union, nor the diplomatic pygmies
in the Swedish Government ever responded positively towards Israel's requests.
At least Sweden produced this decent and
honourable man. This is more than can be said
about many other countries. Just look at
Switzerland, only recently have it's citizens who
helped Jews been "rebilitated" as decent Swiss.
Only trouble is, just one Swiss has survived to
be told that he has been "forgiven." for helping
Jews during the genocide of European Jewry.
Wallenberg should be taught as a part of modern
Sweish history in it's schools. And yes, well done to the Local.
Report abuse »
#7
16:27 January 3, 2012 by itsspideyman
As an American (with a Swedish fiance) I have
known of the story of Raoul Wallenberg and his
humanitarian fight. He is a hero here in the
States and we accept him as one of our own.
I can understand the difficulites of confronting
an embarrasing past. Here in the States we have
our own. I very much admire the people of Sweden,
I have been taken in as family, and I feel I
understand the heart of the Swedish people. If I
can give any advise, I would look to Raoul
Wallenberg as an example. Be brave in your heart,
have courage to explore the past, no matter what
it brings. The past has no power, other than
guide your thoughts of the future. Find out the
last days of Raoul Wallenberg , his capture and
his ultimate fate. When you do this, perhaps the
spirit of Wallenberg will no longer wander
between adopted countries, but can finally come Home.
Report abuse »
#8
19:00 January 3, 2012 by guliver
Roekdal
Thank you very much, I read with big interest about Valdemar and Nina,
Wallenberg is famous but there were many many
simple people with good heart in all over Europe
who risk their lives to save the Jews,I really do
not know all of them and for me they are all to be admire like Wallnberg,
In Yad Vashem the Holocaust museum in Jerusalem
there are all the names of these heroes,generally
was planted a tree for the memory of that persons
and under the tree there is a stone with their details,
Till today there are surviviours who remember
these people and the state of Israel bring them
and their families to a special cerimony in which
they or their children get a medal and an honorable certificate,
May God bless all of them.
Report abuse »
#9
03:38 January 4, 2012 by Gadgetguy
The answer to Sweden's ambivalence to Wallenberg
is far simpler, ANTI-SEMETISM STUPID! Saving Jews
has never been popular; it was not and still
today is not even though Jews by far are the most
important racial group since the beginning of mankind.
Report abuse »
#10
13:51 January 4, 2012 by Streja
I find the article and comments a bit odd. Why do
the posters here assume that kids in school don't
learn about Raoul? What about the great movie
with Stellan Skarsgård? It's not like Swedes
don't know who he was and are not proud of him.
Swedes perhaps don't brag about him like many other nationalities would.
Surely Sweden's history after the war is full of
good stories about helping others? Does that not
mean that we lernt something from the war and what happened?
Swedes are not all state officials either.
Report abuse »
#11
10:30 January 5, 2012 by rufus.t.firefly
First, although there are not many comments about
this article, those that appear here reflect
serious thought, a refreshing change from the usual stuff.
Second: @Streja: I appreciate your comments, and
will look for the movie you mention. But it is
fair and accurate to point out the ambivalence of
Official Sweden in addressing Raoul Wallenberg's
fate and to continue demanding a serious effort
to get to the truth. The unanswered questions
will remain a black mark on Sweden.
Report abuse »
#12
13:56 January 5, 2012 by KungsholmenGuy
I for one wonder about Lavaux's (post number 5) first long comment paragraph.
Clearly Sweden benefited immensely from its iron
ore trade, and other commerce, with Germany
during WWII. Are there no wartime government
cabinet documents that can be accessed now that
would prove that the highest levels of Swedish
government were instrumental in attempting to
frustrate Wallenberg's attempts to save Jews?
(which would obviously have angered their number
1 commerical trading partner). Sadly human nature
is such that financial issues often trump other factors.
If the disapproval of Wallenberg reached the
Swedish foreign ministry from the highest levels
of the Swedish government, then the diplomatic
corps would be merely guilty of treating
Wallenberg the way they were told to. Not
admirable for anyone to have been unhelpful to
Wallenberg, but it would be good to know what
authority was calling the shots (unless it was
the sociological factors mentionned in Lavaux's 2nd and 3rd paragraphs).
Could the slow response to recognize Wallenberg
be directly or indirectly attributable to the
desire to downplay his heroism by one or more
influential (but embarassed) political families in Sweden?
Report abuse »
#13
18:13 January 5, 2012 by cogito
@Lavaux, right all the way through (#5)
What boons did the foreign ministry extract?
We'll never know most of it.
It is well known in diplomatic circles, however,
that one renowned Swedish ambassador to the USSR
returned home with a quantity of rare silver Russian antiques.
Although this was in principle illegal, somehow
he was permitted, unofficially, to take the
precious objects out of the country.
In exchange for...?
Report abuse »
#14
18:33 January 5, 2012 by Observant
The main reason why the b@stard Swedish
Government at the time and NOW are not worried
over Raoul Wallenberg is solely because the
Swedes were NOT neutral in the Second World War
they were on the side of Germany.
So any investigations into Wallenbergs
whereabouts would be against the attitude of the
German people and German state. Seeing that
Wallenberg helped so many hundreds of Jews escape the German NAZI war machine.
Any Swedish involvement into Wallenbergs
disappearance would be insulting to Sweden's
dearest NAZI and SS regime of whom the Swedes
hold very dearly to this very day!!! For what reason only God knows!
Report abuse »
#15
19:52 January 5, 2012 by philster61
Any Swedish involvement into Wallenbergs
disappearance would be insulting to Sweden's
dearest NAZI and SS regime of whom the Swedes
hold very dearly to this very day!!! For what reason only God knows!"
Guess its genetic...... Swedes after all are descended from the Krauts.....
Report abuse »
#16
05:10 January 6, 2012 by jimfromcanada
Congratulations to the Swedish Junior hockey team for winning the Gold medal!
Report abuse »
#17
08:06 January 8, 2012 by RobinHood
Before and at the beginnng of the war, many
Swedes were sympathetic to the Nazis. Living
opposite the seemingly next great super power
triggered a political process called
Finlandisation, where a small weak country bends
over backwards to please its huge aggressive
neighbour - or else. That is how Sweden avoided
the fate of Denmark and Norway. But by the end of
the war, it was clear Sweden had backed the wrong
horse, and shifted its sympathy towards the
allies, and somewhat cynically rediscovered its
neutrality. Wallenberg was dispatched to
Budapest, in the last stages of the war. By then
the allies had realised the mechanics of the
Final Solution, and Budapest was next on the list
for "cleansing". Wallenberg's mission was
triggered at US request, they were looking for a
German speaking neutral diplomat to disrupt
Eichman's plans in Budapest. Wallenberg fitted the bill.
--
+44 (0)7786 952037
http://groups.google.com/group/uk-911-truth
http://www.youtube.com/user/PublicEnquiry
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Diggers350/
http://www.reinvestigate911.org/
http://www.thisweek.org.uk/
http://www.911forum.org.uk/
"Capitalism is institutionalised bribery."
_________________
www.abolishwar.org.uk
www.globalresearch.ca
www.public-interest.co.uk
www.radio4all.net/index.php/series/Bristol+Broadband+Co-operative
www.facebook.com/media/set/?set=a.1407615751783.2051663.1274106225&l=90330c0ba5&type=1
<http://utangente.free.fr/2003/media2003.pdf>http://utangente.free.fr/2003/media2003.pdf
"The maintenance of secrets acts like a psychic
poison which alienates the possessor from the community" Carl Jung
<https://217.72.179.7/members/www.bilderberg.org/phpBB2/>https://217.72.179.7/members/www.bilderberg.org/phpBB2/
Fear not therefore: for there is nothing covered
that shall not be revealed; and nothing hid that
shall not be made known. What I tell you in
darkness, that speak ye in the light and what ye
hear in the ear, that preach ye upon the housetops. Matthew 10:26-27
Die Pride and Envie; Flesh, take the poor's advice.
Covetousnesse be gon: Come, Truth and Love arise.
Patience take the Crown; throw Anger out of dores:
Cast out Hypocrisie and Lust, which follows whores:
Then England sit in rest; Thy sorrows will have end;
Thy Sons will live in peace, and each will be a friend.
http://tinyurl.com/6ct7zh6
--
Please consider seriously the reason why these elite institutions are not discussed in the mainstream press despite the immense financial and political power they wield?
There are sick and evil occultists running the Western World. They are power mad lunatics like something from a kids cartoon with their fingers on the nuclear button! Armageddon is closer than you thought. Only God can save our souls from their clutches, at least that's my considered opinion - Tony
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"PEPIS" group. Please feel free to forward it to anyone who might be interested
particularly your political representatives, journalists and spiritual leaders/dudes.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pepis?hl=en
