Royal fingerprints all over 'Damson Berry' Hamza
and Finsbury Park 7/7 terror gang
So Abu Hamza was definitely working for MI5, under the codename 'Damson Berry'.
http://www.911forum.org.uk/board/viewtopic.php?p=176786#176786
- Tony Gosling - Bristol - 20th January 2018
And the Queen wanted him out of the country. Why?
Had her MI5 chums urged her to get Hamza and
Aswat out of the UK legal jurisdiction?
So none of her subjects could bring private
prosecutions against MI5 for running a terror
cell in Finsbury Park Mosque in the early 2000s
that ended up killing 56 people on 7/7?
We know the FP Imam begged the Met pre 7/7 to
help him get rid of them from the mosque which
Abu Hamza and his assistand Haroon Rashid Aswat
were using as part of the Al Muhajiroun jihadi group.
We also know that Haroon Aswat was named by
Scotalnd Yard in 2005 as the probable
'mastermind' of the 7/7 London Bombings having
been in touch with all four alleged bombers in the couple of days before 7/7.
He's now also languishing in a US jail, also out
of reach of any justice should any UK police
prosecuters or victims' families wish to prosecute either of the men.
Does rather look like the Queen was right to be
nervous about Frank Gardener saying on the Today
programme "I can tell you that the Queen was
pretty upset that there was no way to arrest him.
She couldn't understand – surely there had been
some law that he had broken?" Because what we're
witnessing here is the Head of State, who likes
to appear to the public and press as 'non
political', using her considerable influence over
government and the judiciary, to help terrorist
suspects escape justice in the 7/7 London
Bombings. Those terror suspects include both
Haroon Aswat, Abu Hamza and MI5 handlers and
officers who were managing the Finsbury Park cell.
Technically the Queen could, and I believe
should, be prosecuted under section 15 of the
Terrorism Act 2000 for her political influence to
prevent Hamza, and presumably Aswat too, being held to account.
A second count too of Perverting the Course of
Justice. The Al Muhajiroun pair could and should
possibly be assisted to turn 'Queen's evidence'
to testify against MI5 officers in the 7/7 London
Bombings and subsequent cover-up.
Just more proof, if it were needed, that, in key
issues, we are living in a lawless nation. As
with ex-Senator Stuart Syvret's exposure of the
Jersey child sexual abuse, all roads lead to
Buckingham Palace, Sandringham and Balmoral.
Abu Hamza says he was tipped off about 9/11 FOUR DAYS before attacks
https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/904874/Abu-Hamza-tipped-off-9-11-FOUR-DAYS-attacks-new-york-finsbury-park-hate-preacher
HATE preacher Abu Hamza says he was tipped off
about 9/11 four days before the horrendous terror attack on New York City.
By
<https://www.express.co.uk/search?s=Chloe%20Kerr&b=1>CHLOE
KERR PUBLISHED: 12:04, Mon, Jan 15, 2018
The hook-handed former imam claims he received a
phonemail from terrorists in Afghanistan who told
him “something big will happen very soon”.
The revelation comes from court documents as the
59-year-old is launching an appeal claiming
conditions in the Supermax prison in Colorado,
where he is being held, breach his human rights.
Hamza also claims British spies were hacking his
phone at the time raising questions as to whether
the UK was withholding information from America.
The court documents, seen by The Sunday Times,
also reveal Hamza was an agent for MI5 and
Special Branch, going by the code name Damson Berry.
Almost 3,000 people died after al-Qaeda
terrorists flew hijacked planes into the World
Trade Centre twin towers in New York and the Pentagon in September 2001.
The allegations come after a black and white
photo of the hate preacher taken within the prison emerged recently.
The snap shows him without his hooks, looking
scrawny with white hair and beard.
The convicted hate preacher has been in solitary
confinement for two years and is appealing to be moved to a British prison.
He claims his conditions at the Supermax prison
breach his human rights under Article 3 of the
European Convention, which prevents from “inhuman and degrading treatment”.
After his conviction of 11 charges, he was put
into solitary confinement and only allowed out of
his cell for one hour each day.
Even when he gets fresh air he is kept in a cage away from other inmates.
Before he was extradited to the US in 2012, he
was locked up in Belmarsh prison in south east London.
There he received frequent medical visits as he
is a double amputee, blind in one eye and suffers
from diabetes, psoriasis and a condition that means he sweats excessively.
However, he does not get the same treatment in Colorado.
The document claims: “The stumps in both arms are
subject to regular outbreaks of infections, which
have been increasing in severity.”
ADX Florence in Colorado holds 410 male inmates
deemed too dangerous to be in one of the country’s high security jails.
In 2004, Hamza was arrested by British police
after the US requested he be extradited to face
charges. He was later charged by British
authorities with sixteen offences for inciting violence and racial hatred
<https://www.express.co.uk/pictures/pics/12063/Abu-Hamza-al-Masri-hook-hand-cleric-terrorism-Finsbury-Park-mosque-pictures/232165>[Innocent]
Boston Marathon bomber Dzhokhar Tsarnaev is also held in the Supermax.
In May 2014, Hamza was convicted of all 11
charges on terrorism offences at Manhattan’s
Federal Court and sentenced to life imprisonment
without any possibility of parole in January
2015. He wants to serve the remainder of his sentence in England.
One of his lawyers said: “We strongly believe
that the conditions of his confinement violate
the expectations of the European Convention on
Human Rights and the promises that were made by
the US government to the [British and European]
courts as part of the extradition process.
“He would go back to Belmarsh in a second if he could.”
Should BBC have let Queen off the hook over Hamza?
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/should-bbc-have-let-queen-off-the-hook-over-hamza-8174955.html
Corporation 'sorry' after revealing monarch
'lobbied Government to expel extremist'
*
<http://www.independent.co.uk/author/terri-judd>Terri
Judd,
<http://www.independent.co.uk/author/ian-burrell>Ian
Burrell Tuesday 25 September 2012 18:34 BST
The BBC was criticised last night for making an
abject apology to the Queen after one of its
senior journalists claimed that the monarch
politically intervened in the case of the radical Islamist cleric Abu Hamza.
The BBC security correspondent Frank Gardner said
on breakfast radio that the Queen had lobbied a
Home Secretary about what she saw as the unduly
lenient treatment of Abu Hamza, questioning why
he had not already been arrested.
Within four hours, the BBC – nine days into the
stewardship of its new director-general George
Entwistle – apologised to Buckingham Palace,
saying that Gardner, one of the most respected
journalists of his generation, had betrayed the
Queen's confidence. The corporation "deeply
regretted" his "wholly inappropriate" revelation, it said.
Republicans and some journalists criticised the
BBC apology, insisting it was right that the
public learnt of such interventions.
Gardner's disclosure is troublesome for
Buckingham Palace because the Queen traditionally
does not intervene in public policy. As a
constitutional monarch, the 86-year-old is
supposed to maintain political neutrality. She
holds a private weekly audience with the prime
minister of the day – she is on her 12th – and so
the public rarely ever learns her opinion on any matter of consequence.
Kevin Marsh, a former editor of Today and former
editor of the BBC College of Journalism who now
runs the media teaching company OffspinMedia,
said: "I can understand the new Director-General
would want to close this down quickly but I
thought the apology was a little excessive."
He added: "I was surprised when I heard Frank
Gardner make the comment because he is terribly meticulous."
The revelation and subsequent apology elicited an
angry response from Republic, the pressure group
that lobbies for the abolition of the monarchy,
which accused the BBC of a pro-royalist public relations exercise.
"The decision to disclose this one conversation
while keeping all else secret smacks of a
deliberate PR stunt to put the Queen on the right
side of public opinion," Republic claimed.
Its chief executive Graham Smith accused the
Queen of "meddling in the political process",
adding: "We're told the Queen is above politics
and never gets involved, yet she has apparently
admitted that she has interfered in a controversial issue."
Gardner, who was not available for comment
following the BBC apology yesterday, is
understood not to have felt especially
constrained by royal protocol given his
specialism in security rather than Palace
matters, and to have initially thought his disclosure of marginal significance.
Details of the Queen's comments emerged as it was
revealed that the radical cleric, 54, and four
other terror suspects could be sent to the US
within days after the European Court of Human
Rights threw out their request for an appeal to the Grand Chamber.
Discussing the issue on Radio 4's Today programme
yesterday morning, Gardner said: "I can tell you
that the Queen was pretty upset that there was no
way to arrest him. She couldn't understand –
surely there had been some law that he had broken?
"In the end, sure enough, there was. He was
eventually convicted and sentenced for seven
years for soliciting murder and racial hatred."
His surprised colleague, the presenter James
Naughtie, replied that this revelation was "a
corker". Gardner said: "She told me she spoke to
the Home Secretary at the time and said, 'Surely
this man must have broken some laws. Why is he
still at large? He was conducting these radical
activities and he called Britain a toilet. He was
incredibly anti-British and yet he was sucking up
money from this country for a long time.'"
Buckingham Palace declined to comment on private conversations.
Gardner did not specify which Home Secretary the
Queen had lobbied, although David Blunkett, who
held the post from 2001 to 2004, at the peak of
Abu Hamza's infamy and before he was arrested,
soon after denied it was him: "I can
categorically state that the Queen never raised
the issue of Abu Hamza with me. Not surprisingly
because my views and attitude in relation to this
individual were very well known."
Royal views: Upset and angry
Several years before fox hunting with dogs was
banned in 2005, it is reported the Queen lobbied Tony Blair at Balmoral.
Her biographer Sally Bedell Smith wrote: "She
patiently explained to him over dinner that
hunting was an activity not only for the upper
class but regular people as well."
Her Majesty was also enraged by the credit
crunch, having lost a substantial portion of her
personal fortune as the "awful" economic crisis
began. At a briefing by LSE academics, she said: "Why did nobody notice it?"
Prince Charles, whose letters to ministers will
soon be revealed following a High Court ruling,
is far more dogged in pursuing influence over
senior government figures. He has already
summoned Chancellor George Osborne and the
Education Secretary Michael Gove for secret meetings.
During the Blair years, he allegedly enraged the
Prime Minister with his disgust for genetically
modified food and his boycott of a state banquet
for China's President Jiang Zemin. In 1984, he
described a planned addition to the National
Gallery as a "monstrous carbuncle".
From South America, where payment must be made
with subtlety, the Bormann organization has made
a substantial contribution. It has drawn many of
the brightest Jewish businessmen into a
participatory role in the development of many of
its corporations, and many of these Jews share
their prosperity most generously with Israel. If
their proposals are sound, they are even provided
with a specially dispensed venture capital fund.
I spoke with one Jewish businessmen in Hartford,
Connecticut. He had arrived there quite unknown
several years before our conversation, but with
Bormann money as his leverage. Today he is more
than a millionaire, a quiet leader in the
community with a certain share of his profits
earmarked as always for his venture capital
benefactors. This has taken place in many other
instances across America and demonstrates how
Bormann’s people operate in the contemporary
commercial world, in contrast to the fanciful
nonsense with which Nazis are described in so much “literature.”
So much emphasis is placed on select Jewish
participation in Bormann companies that when
Adolf Eichmann was seized and taken to Tel Aviv
to stand trial, it produced a shock wave in the
Jewish and German communities of Buenos Aires.
Jewish leaders informed the Israeli authorities
in no uncertain terms that this must never happen
again because a repetition would permanently
rupture relations with the Germans of Latin
America, as well as with the Bormann
organization, and cut off the flow of Jewish
money to Israel. It never happened again, and the
pursuit of Bormann quieted down at the request of
these Jewish leaders. He is residing in an
Argentinian safe haven, protected by the most
efficient German infrastructure in history as
well as by all those whose prosperity depends on his well-being.
<http://l.facebook.com/l.php?u=http%3A%2F%2Fspitfirelist.com%2Fbooks%2Fmartin-bormann-nazi-in-exile%2F&h=eAQErj17O>http<http://l.facebook.com/l.php?u=http%3A%2F%2Fspitfirelist.com%2Fbooks%2Fmartin-bormann-nazi-in-exile%2F&h=eAQErj17O>://spitfirelist.com/books/martin-bormann-nazi-in-exile/
--
--
Please consider seriously the reason why these elite institutions are not discussed in the mainstream press despite the immense financial and political power they wield?
There are sick and evil occultists running the Western World. They are power mad lunatics like something from a kids cartoon with their fingers on the nuclear button! Armageddon is closer than you thought. Only God can save our souls from their clutches, at least that's my considered opinion - Tony
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"PEPIS" group. Please feel free to forward it to anyone who might be interested
particularly your political representatives, journalists and spiritual leaders/dudes.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pepis?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PEPIS" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
